>If you don't think exactly the same as me you're a RETARD basterd bitch.Why is /sci/ like this? Is it autism?
We have posters here who:1. Thought infinity digits of pi meant the works of Shakespeare would appear in it.2. That photons are conscious in the double slit experiment.3. Had no ability to grasp how things that are unproven are indistinguishable from entirely fictional claims.4. Failed middle school mathematics.5. Couldn't understand the difference between 0.002 dollars and 0.002 cents.6. Called the ongoing expansion of the universe "not proof of the big bang".7. Actually, and unironically, claimed the universe being flat is "stupid nigger shit" because everyone knows it's a sphere.And assorted other things. Let's assume even half are just flat out bait. That still leaves a lot of the dumbest fucking subhuman mongrels I have ever had the displeasure of speaking to and reading. Holy shit the sheer IQ level of this board is lower than fucking /b/. It's appalling.
>>16778440My opinions >>> your opinions.
>>16778453>6>includes his fucking bait in his list of bullshitThanks for playing, dumb fuck. Stop pretending to be unable to entertain every other possibility.
>>16778484spbp
>>16778484this is true if his agrees with mine. Otherwise he is a retarded fuck and needs to rope himself
>>16778453six and seven are at odds with each other. it implies you believe with certainty there was a big bang solely because "the universe is expanding," and defend the notion that it's also flat?
>>16778453>1. Thought infinity digits of pi meant the works of Shakespeare would appear in it.But they would appear in it you retarded pig fucker. You obviously have no idea what the concept of infinity means. Within infinity you would find all of human literature, and that is not even scratching the surface. You would find the interaction of every chemical reaction within every cell of every human body which has ever existed, down to the quectosecond. And even that would be an infinitesimal amount within infinity.You have no fucking idea what infinity means.Fucking ignorant dumbass. Obviously your brains were fucked out your ass by both your grandfathers. No wonder you are such a squealing sack of stupid shit.
>>16778453>Couldn't understand the difference between 0.002 dollars and 0.002 cents.Kek I remember this. Should've added some monty hall kino as well
>>16778440>>16778630Indian. Do not redeem saar.
>>16778630Pi as a number in and of it self, and pi when plugged into the process of writing out all its digits into symbols humans can use, which is called decimal expansion, is absolutely not the same and it only makes you a midwit Dunning-Kruger by revealing that you don't know any of this.You can't prove the existance of something by hand-waving about "infinity". You're making a very specific claim, which is that pi's expansion contains every finite sequence of digits (or characters in your case) and this has not been proven for pi. It cannot be accepted just because pi's expansion is infinite, you would actually have to show it. But if you respond "Well duh, that would be impossible!" then that's the point: if can't be converted into something meaningfully tangible then it quite simply has no meaning.You have to distinguish between the general notion that "there are infinitely many possible finite strings" from the nontrivial claim that "every one of those strings appears as a contiguous block in this particular infinite sequence". That latter is a precise, and nontrivial statement that requires proof or a construtive method to demonstrate the occurances.
>>16778630>>16778767Actually meaningful mathematical truth rests on explicit constructions or methods, and not on arrogant appeals to a hypothetical completed infinite totality. In order for you to not be a retard when claiming "pi contains Shakespear" (and I'm cutting you near-infinite slack becase the most I would normally accept is "pi could be used to produce Shakespeare") you would need either: a) a constructive procedure that locates, for any given finite text one of its occurances in pi's digits in your chosen base or encoding; or b) a proof acceptable in the adopted framework. It's true that we've observed that pi has a lot of complexities going on in its digits, but none of that substitutes for a proof. Computation up to any finite limit cannot establish a universal property about the entire expansion.Invoking "infinity" as a catch-all is a categorical error, you're replacing mathematical argument with metaphor, and it's in the vein of the absolute worst cancerous pop-sci.
>>16778630>Within infinity you would find all of human literatureThe number 0.123123123123... is infinite. Please find Hamlet in it.
>>16778785>The number 0.123123123123... is infiniteIt isn't btw
>>16778791euler-gamma function is infinite. where's Harry Potter & the Philosopher's Stone? I'll make it easy. Make it any single page that mentions Harry, and you should be able to reproduce the entire page. Specify which page number, which sequence in the number you've identified, and how you recognized it corresponds to the page you determined.
>>16778767>>16778770Look, through the power of seethe I have launched the pigfuck retard into orbit!
>>16778791what you say: true, reason: less than 1what he meant: infinite decimal
>>16778440Sorry, I'm a mathematics. It's just a habit
>>16778800>Look, through the power of seethe I have launched the pigfuck retard into orbit!
>>16778791Just as infinite as Pi. Sorry I wasn't specific enough to say infinite decimal expansion.
>>16778800no you are fucking madarchod!
>>16778785123 = a123123 = (123)_2 = b...123_26 = z123_27 = abThe = 123_xThe boy = 123_x 123_yEtc.
>>16778814the retarded meme pics mean you lost
>>16778838Please format your syntax schema in proper BNF and then explain how "123123123123123123123123123123123123" can be decyphered unambiguosly.
>>16778846>if you act imporperly you're disqualified and I win hahahaNo, I beat you intellectually and I beat you in presenting you as the laughting-stock you are with memetics, There was absolutely no aspect to this conversation where you won.
>>16778838>>16778854And btw, if you let go of your ego for a second, you could even make use of this discussion that took place in this thread.You could absolutely decimate all your jeet professors at your college with even just a little bit of intuitionistic mathematical reasoning and be the smartest mathematician on campus.I mean, judging based on how you interact with people and on the fact that you're here don't you regard yourself as some ultra mega genius? Learn some actual knowledge to reach that self-ideal instead of the coping mechanisms for deceiving yourself that you've presented here?
>>16778862You ignorant pig fucker
>>16778870And how are you not ignorant?
>>16778440sounds like something a RETARD basterd bitch would say
>>16778872For starters I don't fuck pigs
>>16778630>mathematical infinity is the same as actual infinitylol, midwit
>>16778453>6. Called the ongoing expansion of the universe "not proof of the big bang".there is no "ongoing expansion of the universe", it's just collective hazing and memes that caused you to believe this.
>>16778899Maybe not but>>16778970You definitely fuck pigsBig fat squealers with shitty bums, yeah you love it.
>>16778440I disagree. You sound like a retard basterd bitch.
>>16778810>specific enough to say infinite decimal expansionBut that's meaningless, it can be represented finitely in an infinite number of base systems, we just arbitrarily happen to use base 10. The better example would be the liouville numbers
>>16778453>1. Thought infinity digits of pi meant the works of Shakespeare would appear in it.if pi is a normal number hen that means that they do
>>16779079He's a Dunning-Kruger lowit with no idea what infinity means. Probably an Indian, lots of them are like that.
>>16778440>implying that disagreement in thought is even necessary to start calling others retarded, or even having a defined opinion in the first placeI see you haven't yet reached the stage where you start getting called a niggerfaggot without even having expressed any opinion whatsoever.
>>16779064>But that's meaningless,No since the guy I was answering claims infinity has everything encoded or some other incoherent nonsense.
>>16778453Have your mental breakdown somewhere else.
>>16778453All rules do not apply beyond an event horizon. All rules can be altered or edited by manipulation of entanglement. Therefore, all is possible. However, the championing of a lack of equity on the basis of primal heirarchy with no rationale, inhibits the states paradoxically. It speaks to flaws in the innermost code all while affirmation of its transcription is lauded as a gospel. Freedom and perfection, in absolutes for every instance of comprehension and perception, is the optimal state. To which, most are entirely oblivious to, but not of their volition or consent. In summary, all the information we gather is important for a moment in its applicability, but falters in the totality of causality and potential. Its just your reference confounded by theirs. Yet both could in a given instance be right while the other wrong. Basic stuff.
