does the singularity of a black hole has infinite fast rotation?a normal object can only spin as fast as the martial allows before it's too fast and is ripped apartand if you had a super material it can not spin faster than the speed of lightbut a singularity could, right?not sure what a spinning point could do anyway
>>16780306A singularity can't spin because it only exist in one dimension
>>16780306Wtf are you asking? Try not being illiterate before posting
>>16780306It's probably not a singularity at all but if it is, it will probably be ring shaped in spinning black holes. >>16780320Its pretty obvious what he's asking
>>16780306As a thought experiment ... maybe. Or not, relativistic effects and all that. For all practicality it sure simply preserves impulse from the grav collapse.
>>16780306if you blink at the right rate, you can make her switch with each blinkthe more you practice, the faster and more irregularly you can control the direction she'll move(I'm listing to the dialogs as a podcast of two women and blinking at this shit for 2 hours)
>>16780306>does the singularity of a black hole has infinite fast rotation?In what reference frame? A spinning black hole has a ringularity whose angular momentum cannot exceed c, but causality can be violated in the anti-universe region.
>>16780306We don’t even know if a singularity exists, you damn monkey. A point of infinite density and infinite curvature is unrealistic bullshit and only shows the incompleteness of the theory. Fuck your question.
>>16781137>fuck your questionyou can't fuck a question dumbass. fucking idiot. retarded faggot vanta black chinkoid.
>>16781021>probably not a singularity at all>ring shaped>ring>singularityIn which anon explains the underlying issue but fails to notice.Side note, what is a 3 dimensional ring?
>>16780306>but a singularity could, right?No, just like electrons, a singularity can't spin, lmao
>>16781979>just like electrons, a singularity can't spin
>>16782037I'm 99% sure you are trolling but: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/quantum-particles-arent-spinning-so-where-does-their-spin-come-from/
>>16782427>haha they cant spin stupid pleb>no wait not like that!They spin. You're wrong. Concession accepted.
Spin is a form of intrinsic angular momentum, which arises from rotational motion. In a single dimension, there is only forward and backward movement; there is no space for a particle to rotate around an axis.A Singularity can't spin.
>>16782438Do they spin or did some fucktard misuse nomenclature?
>>16782453I don't give a fuck about your coping pilpul, bro. The fact is that the word "spin" does indeed apply to an electron. And I'm going with the actual experts over some bozo coping on 4chan. Maybe learn what you're talking about before you decide to say things off the cuff.
>>16782453Can't you see he is trolling? Lmao, a quick google search shows its just the name and has nothing to do with actual spinning, the article also says the same, so he is either mentally challenged or purposefully trolling, either way just ignore
