I realize this is schizobabble on my part, but:What if massive fundamental particles are naked singularities? The electroweak symmetry breaking was the gravitational collapse, entangled pairs could possibly share information along closed timelike curves (long-shot), and I feel like it would provide some intuition for baryo/leptogenesis and even the spin-statistics theorem. It would explain the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and General Relativity when it comes to mass.
>>16780528They would evaporate instantly to hawking radiation
>>16780535Doesn't Hawking radiation require an event horizon?
>>16780528>naked singularitiesfake>electroweak symmetry breakingfake>gravitational collapse?>closed timelike curvesfake>baryo/leptogenesisfake>Higgsfake and gay
>>16780528Have you considered the ramifications for the quasi entangled superfluid viscosity calculations? Once you solve that problem and get the hadronic ion generator fully collapsed at a quantum level, I think your theory is good to go for an experimental run on the deoxygenated and devalved cloud computing virtual chambers.
>>16780535To add on to his schizo model, what if they do decay, but then fall in again due to gravity? Wave-particle duality comes from diffusing into decay products (the wave) and collapsing into a single definite point (the particle). Why yes, I do like speculating over complete nonsense and making it ever more convoluted.
>>16780528Not really a new idea, Wheeler popularized the idea of fundamental particles being black hole-like ("geons") in the 50s to explain quantization, and physicists have toyed with it from time to time since. It has some neat properties, but like most attempts at quantum gravity it's impractical/impossible to verify.
>>16780535Hawking radiation doesn't apply to naked singularities.
>>16780528 Reply with Divinebabble then if You're worried about schizobabble
>>16781258>>16780528Better yet Lingua andor Translogic
>>16780528<3What if they are high Fractal physics?So going By Your Logic Coherence...
>>16780528I'm an anon from the future who plans on publishing a fully cited, referenced, and peer-reviewed theory of wave optics and temporal mechanics that's slated to render the Standard Model obsolete. You won't be hearing much about this theory until after the first full moon of the coming Treta Yuga, but here's what I can share as of September 2025;>What if massive fundamental particles are naked singularities?Max Planck, Louis De Broglie, Karl Schwarzchild, and Stephen Hawking's discoveries strongly suggest this.>entangled pairs could possibly share information along closed timelike curvesWilliam Hamilton, James Maxwell, Hendrik Lorentz, Kurt Godel, and John Conway's discoveries strongly suggest this.>They would evaporate instantly to hawking radiationThey would not, because of a functional analogue to the same physical phenomenon that prevents galaxies from spontaneously dissolving into loose stars, planets from spontaneously dissolving into dust, and atoms from spontaneously dissolving into energy.Peace out, and read Pythagoras, Euclid, Archimedes, al-Khwarizmi, and the Vedas if you want to know more.
holy shit you fucking moron breathe some air
>>16782191>I'm an anon from the futurewhich one? predict some shit
