>What causes this low level of intelligence
A low level of intelligence causes a low level of intelligence

File: 1729352495086763.gif (1.7 MB, 220x319)

1.7 MB GIF

>>16783779
Misleading edit.
>hey baby I'm 6'0'' can I sit down with you
>fuck off midget
the average height of a woman is 5'4''
but I'm 5'6'' though
*contemplates suicide*
>and you're wearing elevator shoes
>...
>and you're wearing a toupee that doesn't match you hair
>-ack

>>16783779
i don't think they don't understand what averages are people just say that cause they get offended

>>16783779
>be perfectly average
>have certain height
>chud tells you that your height is different from what it is because (((government))) stats say so
>BTFO him with facts and logic

“But I did eat breakfast this morning”

>>16783818
Why would someone badly edit themselves into a cat video?

Ain’t no way around it.

>>16783779
They understand it, they just can't suppress the impulse from a narcissistic injury they received. They are unique, special and extremely important and if you switch your attention from their individuality to a group and averages, you undermine their importance.
>The average height of a woman is 5'4"
>But we need to talk about ME. I'm not like the rest.

Its not low IQ. Its pointing out the important fact thar averages dont describe the real world. The typical person is not average, people that actually hit the average standards are rare, almost everyone deviated from it.
To understand the world using numbers, you simply need many numbers. Like multiple excel tables.
This doesnt mean the average is a lie, its simply not enough. When people mention it, they lie by omission, when you point out deviations from it you complement the information.

>>16788074
>They are unique, special
Everybody is unique and special

>>16788077
>The typical person is not average, people that actually hit the average standards are rare, almost everyone deviated from it.
The typical person does fall within or not too far off from the median though, and for things like height, the average and median are pretty close.

>>16788079
on average

>>16788077
On a macro level, regression towards the mean applies

>>16785932
Same reason people go on stage and do stand up. Maybe it's funny.

But I’ve met tall Asians

>>16788074
If you think you don't do that then you're lying to yourself

>>16783779
Why can’t people into cartoons, OP?
Why can't?

>>16783779
Its a nazi psychose.
>not all foids are sloots
>do you want to gas them in auschwitz for the flappiness of their roast beef?

>>16783779
Dumb people ignore averages and use themselves
Really smart people ignore averages and use medium instead

>>16783779
people like to point out that they're not just average and are different from most people in some way

File: 7c415c.jpg (45 KB, 500x500)

45 KB JPG

>>16788353
>regression towards the mean
This is a dumb meme. What does regression even mean in the context of personal statistics?
If some person is tall, that person is tall. Theres no regression. If tall people reproduce, the offspring is usually tall as well. Theres no meaning to the word regression in this context.

>>16783779
Not looking up the word "average" in the dictionary, poor education leading to poor reading comprehension, maybe also lack of patience and desire to stop and think about what you just read in the dictionary.
People should be more worried about their brain's health rather than IQ points, which are akin to CPU processing speed, but a powerful CPU isn't worth much if it has physical issues.

Lol, lmao even

"Average" is a racist dogwhistle, much like "per capita"

>>16783779
The average amount of limbs a person has is 1.98

>>16794938
But I used all four of my limbs to eat breakfast this morning

>>16795008
Arm limbs is what I should have clarified
Nah actually we all have 2 limbs now, sorry anons it is gonna be painful

Lefties can’t into odds. It’s really fucking weird.

>>16792574
>What does regression even mean in the context of personal statistics?
>If some person is tall, that person is tall. Theres no regression.
It means if you take a sample and there's an extremely tall person in the group, the next sample will not have a person as extraordinarily tall.

>>16795245
>, the next sample will not have a person as extraordinarily tall.
Of course not
Theres whole countries where the people are tall. Both average and typical persons would be tall, and their offspring. Typically north europeans, croats and nilotes. Their offspring inherits this, theres no regression to some imagined mean.

But I've met dumb Jews

But I’ve met… idk

Bad education ,genetics, and plebbit

It depends on the context of the conversation. When you hear someone talk about averages you know they are trying to demonize some group, this means they are saying everyone in the group is average. They dont say it but they intend for it to be understood as such, so when you point out deviations, they go like HAHAHA I ONLY SAID AVERAGE

>>16797528
>When you hear someone talk about averages you know they are trying to demonize some group, this means they are saying everyone in the group is average.
Let's talk about this. I disagree. You can say that niggers are more likely to be violent than wiggers without implying that your best friend who happens to be black is more likely to be violent than a random stranger who happens to be white.

>>16797552
>. You can say that niggers are more likely to be violent than wiggers without implying that your best friend who happens to be black is more likely to be violent
I disagree, theres an implicit attempt at blaming entire groups. Otherwise you would talk about specific black people or refer to them by other names such as "gangsters"

>>16797620
>>16797552
And you may disagree on the intentions, but recognize that it will be taken as such by many. Low IQ or paranoia, such talk will be taken as a n attack. Context matters, if its two friends talking theres no attack, just sharing of information. Among strangers it will be seen as an attempt to deploy propaganda. It doesnt matter if most people dont fall for it, some will do and thats how propaganda spreads.

>>16797528
>this means they are saying everyone in the group is average. They dont say it but they intend for it to be understood as such
No, mouth-breathing retard. They're probably not trying to imply anything about "everyone in the group" at all, because if they are talking about averages, they are reasoning on a statistical level, where your thought-terminating NAWALT cliche doesn't matter and doesn't even apply. Your accusation is a category error.

Either way, sane public policy isn't built around your hypothetical good niggers and good jews (who are TOTALLY not like the average). It's built around understanding and influencing patterns on a whole society scale, which involve dynamics between entire groups of people, which you can only practically model in terms of averages and other characteristics of cumulative distributions.

>>16797620
>you
You're literally doing the thing you're pretending to disagree with lol

>>16797632
>And you may disagree on the intentions, but recognize that it will be taken as such by many. Low IQ or paranoia, such talk will be taken as a n attack. Context matters, if its two friends talking theres no attack, just sharing of information. Among strangers it will be seen as an attempt to deploy propaganda. It doesnt matter if most people dont fall for it, some will do and thats how propaganda spreads.
Yes. That's why segregating people of color and segregating colored people are the same evil.

>>16797620
>it's yet another talmudic argument about how if you reason about social issues on the appropriate level of abstraction, you're committing anuddah shoah against all the NAXALTs
Only (((they)))'re allowed to think about the big picture with their Critical Race Theory dogshit, White Guilt etc. You stick to sorting out Tyrones from Jamals one by one. :^)

>>16797650
NTA but I think it's fair to say that every single American Jew who advocated for critical race theory on the basis that Jews are a special nonwhite carveout of whiteness should be deported to Israel and left to die there. All of them. Like if Bill Ackman ever wrote a single thing related to that, he should be deported. However, the majority of Jews, who didn't preach anti-white hate, are totally cool and probably a plus to America.

>>16797672
>the majority of Jews are totally cool and a plus to America
Daily reminder that this opinion is inexorably tied to this one >>16797528. Whenever you see a post like >>16797672 remember it's >>16797528 type "people" posting it.

>>16797678
And vice versa, naturally.

>>16797678
>>16797681
I'm both >>16797672 and >>16797552
It's completely fair to notice that Jews are ridiculously overrepresented in every social power circle, to advocate that the anti-white Jews be violently deported to Israel, and to understand that it would impact fewer than 1% of American Jews.

>>16797689
It's also completely fair to notice that kikes, collectively, are universal nation-wreckers. Therefore it's fair to exclude them from society. It really doesn't matter if only 5% of them are "directly" responsible. The most blatant culprits didn't come out of a vacuum. Try mentioning the ethnic background of that 5% and see how long it takes for your "good" jews to come together and crucify you.

>>16797703
They aren't "my good jews" but
>moth to a flame
sure, I'd agree to burn all of the anti-white ones. I'll never agree to burn the ones who aren't. You need to watch Fox and the Hound again, as an adult.

>>16797711
Ok, I can see now that you simply aren't human. All your likes have it coming. There are no "good" civnats.

>>16797719
>you simply aren't human
Sounds like something an anti-white Jew would say.

>>16797637
>. They're probably not trying to imply anything
Yes they are. I'm not a mouth breather, its just how things are. The statement taken at face value is true, but its implied as propaganda against an entire group. Theres no other reason for spontaneously talking against the behavior of average blacks.
>>16797650
>f you reason about social issues on the appropriate level of abstraction, you're committing anuddah shoah against all the NAXALTs
Yes, because its the intention.

>>16797723
You're either a kike or a golem trying to muddy with waters with your mindless "yes, but still NAXALT" chanting. Either way, you're culpable.

I proved the sinister undertones of such comments because i was talking about blacks and then the attacks came out against jews and pilpul this israel that. You are revealing what was on your mind the entire time.

>>16797727
>its implied as propaganda against an entire group
Why did you backpedal? Doesn't matter. I accept your concession.

Reminder:
They're probably not trying to imply anything about "everyone in the group" at all, because if they are talking about averages, they are reasoning on a statistical level, where your thought-terminating NAWALT cliche doesn't matter and doesn't even apply. Your accusation is a category error.

Either way, sane public policy isn't built around your hypothetical good niggers and good jews (who are TOTALLY not like the average). It's built around understanding and influencing patterns on a whole society scale, which involve dynamics between entire groups of people, which you can only practically model in terms of averages and other characteristics of cumulative distributions.

>because its the intention
And there is nothing wrong with this intention, but I accept your second concession as well.

>>16797729
>NAXALT
So like I said, keep deporting every Jew who IS like that. Why does that scare you so much? Are you an anti-white Jew?

>>16797737
>You are revealing what was on your mind the entire time.
What's on my mind is that it's morally, rationally and practically necessary to put you and your entire family in a Windmill of Friendship summer camp regardless of whether or not you perfectly match the characteristics of the average kike. The way you keep psychotically lying about my position while simultaneously claiming you have "revealed" something about me, which I stated directly, and which contradicts your initial claim, only goes to justify my position.

>>16797738
>Why did you backpedal?
When did i backpedal? I have been saying the same thing this entire thread.
Comments about averages are meant to be understood as "everyone in the group is average" and by everyone, i mean blacks, jews, women or whatever group is being scorned.

>>16797689
>It's completely fair to notice that Jews are ridiculously overrepresented in every social power circle, to advocate that the anti-white Jews be violently deported to Israel, and to understand that it would impact fewer than 1% of American Jews.
It's also completely fair to notice that kikes, collectively, are universal nation-wreckers. Therefore it's fair to exclude them from society. It really doesn't matter if only 5% of them are "directly" responsible. The most blatant culprits didn't come out of a vacuum. Try mentioning the ethnic background of that 5% and see how long it takes for your "good" jews to come together and crucify you.

>>16797741
>dumb kike reposts his incoherent propaganda again

>>16797744
>What's on my mind is that it's morally, rationally and practically necessary to put you and your entire family in a
I know, and everyone knows. Thats whay the thread is about. You communicate these ideas by signaling since you dont have free speech. However the signaling can only be used so many times until it gets recognized as a message you are not allowed to say

>>16797745
>When did i backpedal?
The part where you downgraded your Talmudic screeching from the definite claim that reasoning about averages accuses every member of a group of being average, to some vague judeo-linguistic fart about it being "propaganda against an entire group".

>>16797745
NTA but the thread is pretty much about >>16797528
That post is your brain on globalism. "I identify with a billion strangers"

>>16797746
>dumb kike reposts his incoherent propaganda again
Indeed fucking lol, you dumb fucking cryptokike

>>16797749
>everyone knows
Everyone knows because that's what everyone is thinking. And everyone knows that everyone knows that everyone is thinking it. That especially includes the kikes whining day and night about the rise of a new Hitler. You know everyone's had enough and no one is ashamed to say it.

>>16797751
Thats not backpedaling. It two different ideas conveyed in two different posts. These ideas do not mutually contradict each other, so one isnt a refutation of the other.

>>16797689
>It's completely fair to notice that Jews are ridiculously overrepresented in every social power circle, to advocate that the anti-white Jews be violently deported to Israel, and to understand that it would impact fewer than 1% of American Jews.
It's also completely fair to notice that kikes, collectively, are universal nation-wreckers. Therefore it's fair to exclude them from society. It really doesn't matter if only 5% of them are "directly" responsible. The most blatant culprits didn't come out of a vacuum. Try mentioning the ethnic background of that 5% and see how long it takes for your "good" jews to come together and crucify you.

>>16797757
>n-n-no y-you're a c-cryptokike if you call (((them))) out
>NAXALT!!! NAXALT!!! That's what the real whites believe
You know it's coming and nothing's gonna help you.

>>16797755
>"I identify with a billion strangers"
Yes, because its meant as such. A group gets reduced to average, and everyone in the group gets lumped together as being average.

>>16797745
>When did i backpedal?
The part where you downgraded your Talmudic screeching from the definite claim that reasoning about averages accuses every member of a group of being average, to some vague judeo-linguistic fart about it being "propaganda against an entire group".

>>16797759
>Thats not backpedaling.
It sure is.

REMINDER:

They're probably not trying to imply anything about "everyone in the group" at all, because if they are talking about averages, they are reasoning on a statistical level, where your thought-terminating NAXALT cliche doesn't matter and doesn't even apply. Your accusation is a category error.

Either way, sane public policy isn't built around your hypothetical good niggers and good jews (who are TOTALLY not like the average). It's built around understanding and influencing patterns on a whole society scale, which involve dynamics between entire groups of people, which you can only practically model in terms of averages and other characteristics of cumulative distributions.

>>16797758
>and no one is ashamed to say it.
well you are because you have to hide it beyond talk of averages and other signaling phrases

>>16797762
>n-n-no y-you're a c-cryptokike if you call (((them))) out
>NAXALT!!! NAXALT!!! That's what the real whites believe
>You know it's coming and nothing's gonna help you.
Cryptokike crashes out lmao. Better get your IDF PTSD drugs before we cut you off, baby killer.

>>16797765
>They're probably not trying to imply anything about "everyone in the group" at all, because if they are talking about averages,
Yes they are. Its intended as such for those who understand clearly, and its also for the comment to be misunderstood by others. Actually communicating some trivia information was never the reason.
i.e no one says 13/50 because of their love for statistics and sharing information

>>16797766
You sound like you're having a psychotic episode. How is using statistical reasoning to explicitly argue for the correct policy regarding you and your family, trying to hide this moral, rational and necessary policy directly argued for?

>>16797763
Only an idiot would self identify into a dysfunctional group when there are any number of more functional groups to identify with.

>>16797769
>How is using statistical reasoning to explicitly argue for the correct policy re
Its not arguing for that. Its arguing for gigacaust 9000

>>16797768
>Yes they are.
if they are talking about averages, they are reasoning on a statistical level, where your thought-terminating NAXALT cliche doesn't matter and doesn't even apply. Your accusation is a category error.

Either way, sane public policy isn't built around your hypothetical good niggers and good jews (who are TOTALLY not like the average). It's built around understanding and influencing patterns on a whole society scale, which involve dynamics between entire groups of people, which you can only practically model in terms of averages and other characteristics of cumulative distributions.

>inb4 yet another talmudic argument about how if you reason about social issues on the appropriate level of abstraction, you're committing anuddah shoah against all the NAXALTs
Only (((they)))'re allowed to think about the big picture with their Critical Race Theory dogshit, White Guilt etc. You stick to sorting out Tyrones from Jamals one by one. :^)

>>16797772
>Only an idiot would self identify into a dysfunctional group
Black people cant identify as black?
Women cant identify as women?

>>16797773
It's clear that the stress of watching people go 1488 is driving you to the point of a psychotic breakdown. Get well soon. Friendship Windmill Summer Camp retains only the strong and healthy jews.

>>16797781
>Black people cant identify as black?
Not functionally, unless they're fucking idiots.
>Women cant identify as women?
Women have a biological function. Do you know what that is?

>>16797783
I dont care. I am entertained and i never enjoyed being in the world.

>>16794914
Adding and dividing is White Supremacy

>>16797784
kys

>>16798538
Why? Blacks are a dysfunctional group with no intrinsic value to humanity. Women are a functional group with an intrinsic value to humanity. You somehow disagree?

The irony of pretending to care about the nuances of average vs individual and then jumps straight to DA JEWS

>>16798582
When did this happen? What post or posts are you talking about? If you reply as an Indian would reply, to a collectivized group shit in a street full of interchangeable street shitters, no normal, white American will give you the time of day, other than to make fun of you for being a retarded street shitter.

>>16798601
Now you pretend to be retarded

>>16798607
Who the fuck are you even talking, Pajayay

>>16798608
Pajeejee

>>16798582
>The irony of pretending to care about the nuances of average vs individual and then jumps straight to DA JEWS
It's only "ironic" to you because you're 80 IQ and committing the fallacy in the pic.

>>16789997
You're proving his point
Go watch the @whatever podcast and you'll see this for yourself. They interview hundreds of women so it's a huge dataset.
Men do it occasionally but otherwise show restraint. Women do it reflexively and don't even understand they did it.

>>16783779
Is this about short women wanting 6' men? You'll never convince a woman to change her tastes, so why bother arguing? Do you really think you'll logic a woman into dating you? Just move on.

File: pheno.jpg (396 KB, 798x1200)

396 KB JPG

>>16800906
>Is this about short women wanting 6' men?
Maybe it's about how even a woman with two extra inches of forehead wouldn't be smart enough for the average /sci/ user, statistically speaking.

But I’ve…

>>16783779
you don't understand implicits.
Someone is saying to a woman the averages, why would he say so randomly like an autistic retard?
The most sensible answer is that it's an attack of some kind, some kind of message to the girl in front. Therefore, she makes a move to see what his thing is about and to prehemptively defuse whatever is happening to the best of her abilities.

If you find the social game stupid, that's ok, but you're finding it stupid from the loser's side

>>16783779
>What causes this low level of intelligence
Variation in human intelligence is a result of both genetics and environment, with studies showing that genetic factors account for approximately 50% of the variance in intelligence, a proportion that increases with age.

>>16785932
That gif has been around forever. Lurkmoar, dumbass zoomers.

File: 1749009775949719.jpg (120 KB, 770x600)

120 KB JPG

>>16783779
>study shows 9% increase of butthole cancer if you yeet a buck sneedy more than once a fortnight
>Oh nooo, I can never yeet another sneedy for the rest of my life or I will get butt cancer!!!

>>16795011
>Arm limbs is what I should have clarified
>Nah actually we all have 2 limbs now, sorry anons it is gonna be painful

You always have made mistakes like this.

Rick and Morty evil Dr. Manhattan
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NeVYzpzrmyk

But I’ve met good and decent black folk…

>>16783779
You can’t. Some people DO acknowledge odds they just don’t want to accept it.

Um