why dont women select for intelligence?
>>16785354Because intelligence leads to nihilism and anti-natalism, statistically speaking.
>>16785354this study is flawed. a intelligent person can persuade
>>16785360>a intelligent
>>16785354they do. they select for street smarts, humor, silver tongues, good at business. they dont select for dudes who sit inside all day and read books.
>>16785363>street smarts, humor, silver tongues, good at business.aka not real intelligence
>>16785354>based on speed dating examplesnone of which ended in procreation therefore the study is useless
>>16785354They do. Intelligence is good. They don't select for autists with crippling social issues and weak bodies, even if they have high "intelligence" (IQ), however.
>>16785354Some do and some don't. The net effect is however that lower IQ people have more kids, but this is not purely due to mate selection. There are other enviromental selection effects at play.
>>16785354They do. Look at military officers wives for an example. It's almost exclusively a Jewish thing to have high IQ and be ugly. Usually athletics and aesthetics and IQ correlate among other less inbred races like whites. That's why the concept of the nerd was only invented when Jews took over the legacy media.
>>16785354They do, just indirectly, they select for material factors that intelligence can provide, or simply gaslighting her underpants off
>>16785366Those actually correlate with raw intelligence unlike book reading in a quiet place.
>itt: "they select for betabuxx"
>>16785537This theory does make some degree of sense, like the ethnic affinity of most "white" school shooters
they do
>>16785363if the metric is ability to deceive or convince other humans, that's not actually intelligence you fucking retard>b-but theoretically a superintelligence could use its superior intelligence to manipulate a human!shut the fuck up
because throughout human history the people who has the most children were the strongest and so women who capitulated to strong chad rapists had the most children and their sexual preferences were passed on. not that complicated
>>16785354Hard to select for something that is not readily recognizable.And there are hordes of fakers just trying to fit the "seems smart" fashion.The truth is most people want a partner with a similar IQ to themself. They are selecting for smart enough but not too smart.
Counterpoint, are women selecting for actual retardation?
>women>selectinghuman females didn't have rights until a hundred years ago lmao. millions of years of evolution tell them that they're supposed to cuddle up towards the aggressive invader angry raper man so he doesn't kill them. cancel modern humanity lmao
>>16785704>human females didn't have rights until a hundred years ago lmaoBefore agriculture women probably had more freedom, and it's not like women haven't been cheating behind their husband's backs since forever
>>16785354you need intelligence yourself to recognise and appreciate intelligence.most people aren't that smart.
>>16785358>intelligence [...] leads to anti-natalismThat's antinatalist propaganda bs. So-called Jews are statistically the most intelligent ethnic group and they normally have large families. You're probably deluded by the Kissinger Report.
