post fluid nigga i scored 137 sd 15 most of you should score 90-110 max dont look up tibbies video she is retarded too.
>https://sifter.org/iqtest/iqtest.cgi
>>16786128>post fluid>dont look up tibbies video But who do you think I'm fluidmaxxing for?
I scored 132 raw sd 15 133 sd 16
Answers: 1:m/m 2:15/15 3:8/8 4:6/6 5:5/5 6:4/4 7:1/1 8:2/2 9:b/b 10:b/d 11:c/c 12:a/a 13:c/c 14:d/d 15:c/c 16:c/c 17:b/b 18:c/d 19:d/d 20:d/d 21:c/c 22:c/c 23:d/d 24:b/b 25:a/a 26:ad/ad 27:bc/bc 28:ad/ad 29:ae/bd 30:d/d 31:c/c 32:d/b 33:c/cYour scored 29 correct (out of a possible 33).This implies an IQ of approximately 162 on the European/Cattell scale (stdev 24),or about 141 on the Stanford-Binet/USA scale (stdev 16).
>>16786471you cheated
>>16786860Before someone says I cheated, since I just noticed someone accused another anon of such, I literally did this on my phone 15 minutes before a class starts.I also am old and obstinant with technology so I still don't use AI and don't plan too for a very long time.
>>16786128>150 on the European cattle scaleSolid.
>>16786864You cheated
>>16786948Rude.
>>16787015Truth doesn’t care about your feelings
I mean I scored 131 WAIS equiv on my officer's CFAT before COVID fucked up the recruitment cycle, 138 WAIS on my high school IB applications at 16 (transferred in grade 11), and 98.5%ile on some tests my medical school was internally norming.Seems pretty close. I'm a smart guy but not a genius, I suppose that's why I'm an emergency medicine doc
>>16787069Liar
>>16786129is this a timed test? Gonna go smoke a bowl (of weed) and see how I scoreGot 99 and 127 on previous tests from different sources
>>16787032I didn't cheat anon.Though not like I'd care about validation from a bunch of anonymous folk. My vanity is happy all the same.
>>16787132ok liar if you didnt cheat whats your degree in and did you get a 1600 on the sat?
>>167872101110 and my degree is in chemistry.
>>16787232lmfao, if you were 130+ fluid youd ace the SAT with a 1600 after 5 practice tests min
>>16787210I'm not american so never took SAT's and I'm a physicist.
>>16787415What discoveries have you made?
>>16786128>IQMade up nonsense.
>>16786128Got the same score. Seems a little easy
>>16786128>claims 137 iq>writes constant run-on sentencesI doubt it.
Bow down, you shits.
Question 18 is the only one I'll concede I got wrong. The others are too ambiguous to reasonably say that my answer has less justification than the "correct" one.
There were a few I straight up guessed on. This one's a lot harder than most online quizzes.
>>16786128>137This is a respectable midwit IQ, but note that it's using a stdev of 16 for some reason. SB5 uses a stdev of 15. That and the fact it's not a proctored test under pressure but a pretty popular Internet test to which many people have been exposed without realizing it -- you'll probably need to knock off at least 10 points.
>>16786128>doing free online IQ testsTake 2 standard deviations away from the score.>unironcially sharing the resultsTake another standard deviation away.Congratulations on your 92 Anon
>>16788950>>16788944you guys are retarded this is an official fluid test by mensa that was shared
>>16787934openpsychometrics is shit the only good test on that site is the big 5 you cheated too
>>16789028You're the retard. It's an online meme test that Mensa made "for fun." Mensa has never accepted it as a valid or official IQ test of any kind.
Some of these were fairly ambiguous, meaning I had to guess.Like the 1, 0, -1, 0, X pattern. It could be that the pattern is (-1, -1, +1, +1) or it could be that the pattern is (-1, -1, +1) etc.I went with the first one, but either one makes sense to me.
>>16788950>137 - (3*16)>92lolmao
>>16789067Your gotcha doesn't work because he probably just took OP at his word that "post fluid nigga i scored 137 sd 15.">sd 15>sd 15
>>16789105it's pretty dumb to take the person you're calling stupid at his word
