>>16789051
>post book regarding IQ
>has spelling error in post

>>16789051
Because they're antisemites and can't handle what it says about the superiority of Jewish intelligence.

>>16789051
He just fabricated the "iq data" for all the countries he hates. This is exactly the kind of braindead, fraudulent slop that rightwing racists will gladly slurp up.

>>16789051
It has to do with niggers and IQ which is a forbidden topic.

IQ is meaningless.

>>16789062
Jewish intelligence is genetic, but for everyone else it's purely socioeconomic factors.

>>16789051
It says nepal's iq is 42.
Now its true nepalese are not bright but 42??????

>>16789062
Jews dont have superior intelligence they sell their soul to be intelligent its fucking stupid

>>16789236
Seems so. strange

https://www.academia.edu/110355345/The_Dynamics_of_Intelligence_Quotient_IQ_and_Nepals_Status

>>16789239
Excuse me, but it seems you can't handle the based and redpilled TRVKES in the book.

>>16789248
That's a shitty paper, full of orthographic, grammar and (I think also) factual errors, I suspect it's written by an AI and the author is just filling paperwork while enjoying a trip to Kathmandu.

There is, beyond reasonable doubt, some systematic error.
The test was wrongly translated, shit like that.
None of that is asked, researched or investigated.

It's just (barely) college-level-drivel about socio-economic factors, bla, bla, bla, i.e. there is no consideration it even is a (measurement) *anomaly*, there is nothing interesting in that paper whatsoever, it's just filler.

>>16789326
well ok then

>page 123 of Richard Lynn & David Becker (2019). The Intelligence of Nations. Ulster Institute for Social Research, London GB ISBN 9780993000157.

The authors wrote:

The unweighted national IQ of Nepal is 42.79, which is very
implausible, but the standard deviation across the different studies
is only 4.10. The score also remained stable after weightings at
42.99. Data to calculate a SAS-IQ were not available, thus we can
neither obtain confirmation nor rejection of the psychometric IQ.
Even if all used samples are from rural areas we would expect
anational IQ for Nepal not so far below the national IQ of
its neighbourhood country India (76.24).

The entry for Nepal is reasonably detailed.

File: file.png (320 KB, 975x1240)

320 KB PNG

>>16789350
Picrel is the paper you actually linked (scroll down, nigger), you quoted a reference of that paper, I'm not going to look at ALL the references if I was expecting to find the answer IN THE PAPER YOU LINKED.

Nigger.

>>16789371
i posted a citation arguing against the paper i initially offered my negro. if you slowed down a moment you would have realized i was agreeing with you.

>>16789375
My bad, you are right (but it can also reasonably seen as a knee-jerk defense if you were the author, when only considering the parts that you wrote... without wanting to imply anything).

Thanks for the related reference, then.
(brb)

>>16789350
>>16789382
https://www.ulsterinstitute.org/ebook/THE%20INTELLIGENCE%20OF%20NATIONS%20-%20Richard%20Lynn,%20David%20Becker.pdf
(Nepal is on page 116 here)
Thank you, Nepal, for being the stand-in.
Your scores mean nothing.

In fact... they are probably random! :P (Are they not?)
That's the rural mothers, no?
That would make sense.
That's seemingly all they tested for.

>>16789051
rds on display baka

>>16789052
What do you expect, he's "reading" the audio version.

>>16789052
OP didn't make any claims of being located at any particular point on the bell curve.

>>16789236
Didn't they just kill a bunch of people due to losing access to Facebook?

>>16789052
fpbp

>>16789175
Indian detected

>>16789051
>it's controversial, therefore true
Why is 4chan like this?

On the nepal thing I'm prety sure the gurkha assessment exam must include some sort of test that could generate something like IQ?
even if it's weighted towards their elite.

>>16789062
>>16789251
>>16789638
lmao, this shuts down all Bell Chud threads really fast.

>>16789389
>That's the rural mothers, no?
>That would make sense.
>That's seemingly all they tested for.
thats where the 42 figure seems to come from yeah.

>>16789051
>Lefties doesn't like it
>Therefor, it _must_ be true
The same "logic" that the lefties use to rule out things like hereditarty of intelligence, neoclassical economy etc.
It cannot be the truth if the political opponant profit from it.

That’s why we can't obtain any real recognizations in these areas. People simply don't care about the truth.

File: iqeffects.jpg (73 KB, 602x873)

73 KB JPG

>>16789872
it is true though. IQ correlates to numerous outcomes related to behavior, crime, average earnings and so on. this much isn't really debatable and the only reason some try to debate it is because they think noticing differences between people groups is evil.

>>16789920
lib/leftards are hard egalitarians believing that everyone must be equal, and if people aren't equal then surely only discrimination can be the answer people must be exactly the same.

Several books have been written to satirise this outcomes based approach since It's easier to hack tall people off at the knees.

>>16789932
>lib/leftards are hard egalitarians believing that everyone must be equal
It's funny how retards like you have been taught this strawman by your programmers/handlers.

It only upsets liberals. They truly think biological variance stops once it reaches the brain. I’m serious.

They refuse to separate the test from the reality it tries to measure. They refuse to acknowledge that it only assesses the most standard and straight forward, and thus most easily assessable, form of intelligence—one based on reaction times and memory.

You can have a high capacity, or high IQ, and still lack basic sense, like those brilliant Chinese mathematicians who still have shrines dedicated to Mao in their bathrooms. Intelligent people are often stuck in ruts (stuck in their own heads) these days. The dumb are more cocksure and are thus more productive at times. It is annoying. There was a time when the intelligent were also productive.

>>16789980
You claim you are "serious" but notice how you will fail to name a single liberal who believes there is no variance in brains.

>>16789982
If you don’t believe in IQ - or that some races are more cognitively capable in areas than others - then you don’t believe in biological variance in the brain. It’s also incredibly racist to tear away uniqueness from groups by claiming they aren’t different.

>>16789980
>They refuse to acknowledge that it only assesses the most standard and straight forward, and thus most easily assessable, form of intelligence—one based on reaction times and memory.
This. Slow ass ponderous thinkers who like to digest and obsess over things a lot more slowly won’t be factored/favored.

>>16789980
>They refuse to acknowledge that it only assesses the most standard and straight forward, and thus most easily assessable, form of intelligence—one based on reaction times and memory.
kek, sounds like another chuddie spent years being an 'iq realist' and doing hyperinflated iq tests online and then, finally taking a legitimate test, got his big burly 105iq result back

>>16789988
>If you don’t believe in IQ - or that some races are more cognitively capable in areas than others - then you don’t believe in biological variance
Wow, so if someone has problems with some particular claimed tests of intelligence, that means they think there's no variance in brains. This is the kind of "serious" thinking you do, huh?

>>16789988
How does a low nog racial average help you with the fact that there are still nogs two or three standard deviations from their average who are smarter than you?

>inb4 suddenly coping with statistical illiteracy

>>16789950
No mate, it's merely pushing the idea to the point of governmental insanity. personally I'm an anarchist but you do you.
If you want to describe what you actually think you mean and why you think this way then that'd perhaps be a productive place to start.instead of seething over iq tests.

>>16789994
You're talking from experience I see

>>16790001
you want to have your cake and eat it too.
you need the tests to be legitimate (which they are) so you can live vicariously through the white men who actually push the white average higher (as opposed to dysgenic rednecks who drag it down), but you also need some cope about why your result was so paltry. seen it all before.

>>16789999
That doesn’t bother me. It’s a matter of rates, not race. Some races have stronger presences of intelligence. That’s all. If you want a case for intelligent blacks good at math just look up the Igbo. It’s just not the norm.

>>16789996
See, you can’t separate the test from the reality.

>>16790000
>personally I'm an anarchist
Ok clown

>>16790012
What are you even trying to say?

>>16790013
Waiting for you to type a valid response setting out your personal shaping philosophies instead of calling everyone a race supremacist

>>16789991
>Slow ass ponderous thinkers
Procspeedlet cope.

These threads always remind me of Jonathan Haidt's talk about how the right of the politicalk spectrun understands the left better than the left understands the right

>>16790010
Okay, so why should I prefer muh White ethnostate over a high-IQ state? IOW, why should I prefer a state containing not only smart Whites but also a bunch of slack-jawed hicks, meth addicts, magapedes, Qniggers, etc., instead of a state that replaces all the low-quality Whites with some high-IQ gooks/joooooz/nogs?

>>16789999
How does that facile point help you cope with any of this?

>>16790042
How does the White IQ average help you cope with the fact that your own IQ is lower than it?

>>16790069
You think I'm white?

>>16790069
thats completely irrelevant to the point

>>16790110
wrong

>>16790142
No, othere anon is rightt, it's irrelevant, you're deflecting to race baiting because you don't have an argument

I find it odd how people who rage against IQ always accuse the people who believe in IQ of being full of themselves. “You just think you’re sooo smart huh”.

I find it odd how people who worship IQ are always semi-iilliterate subhuman dumbfucks

>>16790168
They don’t worship it. They see the logic behind it. They’re wondering why you worship the hatred of it, though.

File: 1647273328712.jpg (108 KB, 828x937)

108 KB JPG

>>16790168
b a s e d

>>16790168
>people who worship IQ
Name one.
High IQ mode: provide evidence of the accusation.

>>16790148
he's just salty because it hurts his feefees to admit that blacks average a full standard deviation lower than white people, and that this has consequences. Thats why its gotten down to attempted personal insults lol

>>16790182
Dear newfag,

You can find the IQ worshippers in the numerous iq threads they make on /sci/, including this one.

Regards,
Anon

>>16790168
noticing is hardly worshiping.

>>16790190
Noticing what?

>>16790189
see>>16790190

>>16790189
>You can find the IQ worshippers in the numerous iq threads
Ok, show me one.

>>16790197
See >>16790192
>>16790200
See this guy >>16790190

>I believe in IQ and that some races are smarter on average than other races
>yeah well you’re dumber than some black people I bet you retarded white boy
>yeah probably haha
>THIS ISNT GOING HOW I IMAGINED IT
Every fucking time
No, just because people believe in IQ doesn’t mean they think they’re smarter or superior to you

>>16790202
Stop the deflection and explain what you mean by "worshipping IQ"

>>16790207
What deflection? I answered the question you asked you moron.

>>16790202
What about this guy? Why is it bad to notice things?

>>16790211
Cult members often think they notice things, like signs of their god and so on, unaware that such things are just delusions and hallucinations. Hope that helps.

>>16790212
It's bad to notice things because cult members think they notice things? Is it also bad to drink koolaid because cult members drink "koolaid"?

>>16790212
*tips*

>>16790213
No, I noticed that you're a semi-illiterate dumbfuck, and that was not a bad thing, but it is bad to have hallucinations and delusions. Hope that helps.

>>16790216
>it is bad to have hallucinations and delusions
Which hallucinations and delusions did you find in the post you showed me? List them. Be specific.

>>16790206
>I believe in IQ
Tell me more, what is this "believing in IQ" like?

>>16790218
The delusion of believing in IQ because they hallucinated "noticed things". Just like many cultists who say they believe in their god because they noticed signs.

>>16790219
>Tell me more, what is this "believing in IQ" like?
It's a dumb turn of phrase, isn't it? Like "I believe in science", "I believe in equality" etc.

>>16790224
>The delusion of believing in IQ
See >>16790225. But also you seem to be delusional yourself, because the post you showed me says nothing about "believing in IQ".

>they hallucinated
What did they hallucinate? Name specific things and provide quotes.

>>16790224
noticed what sort of things? crime records?

>>16790225
It's more like a Freudian slip which reveals how "iq believers" "think" and come to have their conclusions.
>>16790227
I thought you were just semi-illiterate but it turns out that you are fully illiterate. I don't know how to have online conversations with illiterate people.

>>16790232
>It's more like a Freudian slip
No, it's exactly like the things I listed, and I agree with you this is now how rational people talk. Also notice how asking you to list the "hallucinations" and "delusions" in the post you linked to (>>16790190) causes you to lose your mind with impotent rage. Come to think of it, simply asking you to show me "IQ worshippers" did that all on its own. You don't like being confronted with your actual, literal delusions?

>>16790236
The IQ worshipping cultist is projecting its feelings on me, how unsightly :^)

>>16790208
Which post, I'm sorry if I missed it, I'd like to be sure what you mean.

One of the things that noticers tend to notice, is that "science-minded" people who score below 90 on an IQ test go stark-raving mad when they see an IQ thread. Maybe this is one of those things smart and good and decent people are not allowed to notice?

>>16790239
What is involved in the act of IQ worship? I want to learn how to spot an IQ worshipper.

Can anyone here explain per capita theory?

>>16790245
He literally just told you. The original sin of IQ worshippers is noticing things. Do you ever notice how people in cults notice things? That's you. You're in a cult, ok???

>>16790245
Don't worry, you are already an experienced iq worshipper, dear subhuman dumbfuck.

Dear filthy subhuman dumb ugly racist evil dumbfucks, I accept all of your concessions. You are insane and you're in a cult. I hope you get stabbed by the neck by the socieconomically disadvantaged. For noticing them.

>>16790248
I'm sorry I don't understand, what exactly do they notice?

>>16790250
If you are dumb are you more likely to be poor or does being poor make you dumb?

Calling out the iq worshipping cult really makes them seethe lmao

>>16790256
It's personal to the individual iq believer. Only they can know what they notice that makes them believe in iq.

I made the IQ worshippers so fucking mad. Dumb filthy pieces of shit. We're gonna kill you all soon and get rid of your cult. Remember Charlie Kirk. This will be all of you soon. We'll see how well you guys notice things when the thing to notice is a sniper hiding behind every corner.

>>16790260
>seethe
It's more a mix of pity and confusion.

>>16790266
Get killed, you IQ worshipping psycho. Your cult's days are numbered.

>>16790264
So is there any general trend in what they ted to notice that makes them a noticer?

>>16790272
The general trend is that they are all deluded

>>16790219
It means they believe not all people, and races, are equivalently cognitively the same, or cognitively capable.

Do all races run equally fast?

>>16790265
>>16790270
Lol, looks like I really broke this hardcore iq worshipper's brain.

>>16790265
>>16790270
This is not me, by the way. This is an IQ worshipper. He obviously worships IQ like everyone else ITT.

>>16790276
>It means they believe not all people, and races, are equivalently cognitively the same, or cognitively capable.
I see, so that's what IQ belief is really about, isn't it? Do you have any more confessions to make?

Did any of you ever read Murray's other books, like "left behind" about social deprivation in white neighbourhoods?

>>16790281
Again. You can take issue with the test, but you cannot take issue with the reality that we’re not all the same.

>>16790282
>"left behind"
*coming apart
minor mental blip

>>16790282
I heard he's writing a new book about how severe social deprivation during the Holocaust is responsible for the Jews having an average IQ on par with India. Are you looking forward to it as much as I do?

>>16790289
Really? Do you think it will receive such a controversial public reception?

>>16790283
What reality? That iq believers are dumbfucks? I don't disagree

>>16790293
I think he will be welcomed in polite company again. He's a reformed man who now understands the environment is key. For example, one of his central contentions is that Jewish white collar criminality is caused by centuries of antisemitism.

>>16790212
man, look how this fag has run away with the thread. lol

>>16790299
Stop noticing my sexuality. Noticing is for schizophrenics and cult members.

>>16790299
Are you embarrassed that your cult beliefs are being exposed in public?

>>16790296
And wait till you hear his theory about why so many of them are pedophiles: he thinks it's because they grow up in New York tunnels. It's all about environmental influences. If only we could put these people in educational summer camps and provide them a healthy environment. Something with a swimming pool.

>>16790303
I hear football is good exercise.

>>16790302
oh yes, thats definitely it

>>16790148
>>16790188
Stop samefagging.

>>16790029
>Okay, so why should I prefer muh White ethnostate over a high-IQ state? IOW, why should I prefer a state containing not only smart Whites but also a bunch of slack-jawed hicks, meth addicts, magapedes, Qniggers, etc., instead of a state that replaces all the low-quality Whites with some high-IQ gooks/joooooz/nogs?
This destroys the 105iq "race realist"

>>16790395
that wasn't me samefagging. i only posted the bottom one. you must be in a really crazy cult because now you're noticing things that aren't even true.

>>16790283
The reality is that we're not the same racially. The reality is also that (if you're >>16789980, as seems likely) you're still coping about your low test result by questioning the merits of IQ tests for showing anything other than racial differences.
This is a typical ploy of the BASED AND REDPILLED AND TRVKE-DROPPING "race realist" who gets a brutal reality check when he takes an actual test. I've seen it for years on this board and /pol/.

>>16790409
Any actual race realist is more than aware of that. It seems quite peculier to fixate on ones personal iq it has little bearing on one's ethnic identity of shared genetic and cultural heritage.
But to recognise that the nature of intelligence and distribution of cognitive traits has a crucial bearing on how a particular group will behave and the technological and civilisational complexity that these combinations of traits can permit.

You seem like the typical leftoid subhuman animal constantly projecting instead of interacting with reality.

>>16790436
>But to recognise that the nature of intelligence and distribution of cognitive traits has a crucial bearing on how a particular group will behave and the technological and civilisational complexity that these combinations of traits can permit.
Oh, so you can deduce all the technological complexity that a "particular group" can develop from their iq scores? Is that what your programmers teach you in the retarded iq cult? Fucking retarded pseudoscientific cultist piece of trash.

>>16790439
you're really not willing to even approach rationality on this subject are you. you must be in a cult

>>16790459
Lol, it's amazing how you retarded cultists make these big pseudoscientific claims about iq and don't even try to back them up when your retardation is called out. Instead you cry about how mean I am to you. Retarded fucking subhuman garbage.

>>16790460
look at this cultist flailing around in agony. poor little culty.

>>16790466
Calling you out as the retarded pseudoscientific cultist that you are really struck a nerve I see. I shall do this more often in the future whenever I see an IQ thread :^)

>>16790469
oh it really really has. gosh my heckin nerves.

>>16790475
Once you're done shitting your pants, you can try to answer the question here >>16790460, subhuman shitbag.

Lol, looks like the iqtard shitbag runs away when it can't defend its retarded cult pseudoscience.

I don’t need to read a book to know that browns and negros are dumb

>>16790484
so what claims specifically are you wanting evidence for again??

>>16790436
>Any actual race realist is more than aware of that. It seems quite peculier to fixate on ones personal iq it has little bearing on one's ethnic identity of shared genetic and cultural heritage.
This sounds like commie cope. I care more about my individual IQ than the racial average (especially since all the racial averages are so pathetically low).
Btw, I come from what would be considered posh/cultured/snotty White stock. How would you feel if I consider my genetic/cultural heritage to be as such, excluding all the genetic trash like low-IQ rednecks/chavs/bogans, etc.? Fair game, right? Or do I have to accept your arbitrary delineation of genetic stock?
>But to recognise that the nature of intelligence and distribution of cognitive traits has a crucial bearing on how a particular group will behave and the technological and civilisational complexity that these combinations of traits can permit.
I care about people who contribute to White high culture, not low-IQ trash who sit around living vicariously through people who do contribute.
>You seem like the typical leftoid subhuman animal constantly projecting instead of interacting with reality.
You're the one with commie tendencies, bruh. I believe in fierce individualism.

>>16790872
how can you miss the point this badly?

>>16790872
Your concept of race is kinda warped. In the traditional sense it's not really so broad as to include everyone, a race is more the product of shared heritage.
I don't believe in some nebulous concept like the white or black race they are just lables someone found convenient.
I'd just rather be with people like myself who share my values and genetics.

>>16790861
Are you illiterate? Read the posts you're replying to you retard.

>>16789193
This. It's nothing more than the piss in a pissing contest.

>>16789389
>rural mothers
I don't think you realize how absurdly low 42 IQ (average!) is supposed to be
Someone with 42 IQ or below would not be able to take care of herself, much less any children.

File: fedneck.png (217 KB, 1494x783)

217 KB PNG

>>16790891
Haven't you figured out yet that nobody cares about your fedneck shtick, brainlet? You will never be White.

>>16790895
>I'd just rather be with people like myself who share my values and genetics.
That's why my priority is a high-IQ state and no longer a White ethnostate. All these rednecks, these magapedes, these Qniggers and their board with the 5000th "insider here" LARP their low IQs fall for every single time -- they're not of my genetic stock and deserve to perish with the 60iq nogs.

>>16791034
No, that's dumb. you're creating a fragile group with contradictory ambitions, high IQ is not enough it's a useful to have better cognitive performance but not less important than homogeneity.

>>16791141
*sorry let me clarify, I'm saying it's dumb to select purely for iq, I don't view the type who fall for that sort of grift as part of my group either but that's because humans cling to religioun like structures that reinforce their group sense.
they aren't bad merely misguided.

I think you keep misunderstanding the intent of my posts likely deliberatly.

>>16790896
so you cant be specific? you'd rather be emotional and insulting?

>>16789051
Scientific racism is not a new concept. This is basically skull shape analysis but in the 20th century, and was funded by a bunch of white supremacist organizations. More or less it's something made to look like science to deliver a conclusion that was determined through ideals a priori- in other words, a scam.
It's so popular because it gives legitimacy to divisive tactics used by the capitalist class on the working class- so we're here arguing about fake things like IQ and how it relates to skin color while they're appropriating our very real productive output.
Mission fucking accomplished, op
>>16789052
Yeah people like OP don't score too high in the literacy department.

>>16791253
Anon this would make literally every cult who has ever asked for money a scam.

>>16791253
its not really about skin color anon. thats a gross oversimplification but i expect nothing less from deluded commies.

>>16791257
>this would make literally every cult who has ever asked for money a scam.
NTA, but... yeah, cults are scams.

>>16791247
Of what use is being specific when you can't read, you illiterate subhuman?

>>16791280
its helps us low IQ morons know what the fuck you want to know instead of having to wade through dozens of your boring shitty posts.

File: brap.jpg (278 KB, 1080x1350)

278 KB JPG

cant believe that color of skin caused this... racism must be stopped at all costs!!! what have wh*te peoploids ever made????????? downvote racists!