ITT: I will demonstrate how you can lose your virginity by just accepting some metaphysical principles like the existence of an omniscient entity and the hard problem of consciousness.1. By the hard problem of consciousness, the only way for a being B to have a qualia Q is by experiencing the state of affairs associated with Q.2. There exists an omniscient God G.3. As G is omniscient, G knows what it's like to get fucked by me.4. Thus, G has the qualia Q of being fucked by me.5. By 1, this is only possible if G experienced being fucked by me5. Thus, I fucked G.6. Thus, I am not a virgin.QEDProtip: You can also lose your V-cards by the same proof. You're welcome.
>>16790367Bump
Men will do anything to lose their virginity except get laid. Your point 1 is already flawed because dreams offer experiences. God can know what it's like to fuck you without having fucked you. As an omniscient being, God also knows what it's like never to have fucked you. Hence, even if you reject the idea that dreams offer experiences, your "proof" falls apart because I can just as easily prove that you've never fucked God because God has qualia of never having fucked you. By the way theology belongs on >>>/his/.
>>16790367>You can also lose your V-cards by the same proof.Doesn't really work. I'm not omniscient.
>>16790917>Your point 1 is already flawed because dreams offer experiences.That requires you to believe that the qualia Q you experience in a dream is the same as the qualia Q' you get while awake. There's no basis for making such an identification. > I can just as easily prove that you've never fucked God because God has qualia of never having *been fucked *by youFixed that for you, but your attempted proof by contradiction fails because there's no contradiction in having different or opposing qualias at different times. For example, you don't have the qualia of being asleep now (i.e. you have the qualia of being not asleep/awake now) but you will have the qualia of sleep later. So it's possible that God had the qualia of being virgin before being fucked by me, but he gained a new qualia after being fucked by me.Also, this is not theology; it's fundamentally a question of logic/mathematics.>>16790926Reread the proof. You just need to believe in the existence of an omniscient being and it doesn't have to be you.
>>16790935>Reread the proof. You just need to believe in the existence of an omniscient being and it doesn't have to be you.I don't believe in God and you can't fuck me the way you fucked God because I'm not omniscient. You can't make me lose my virginity, normie. Nothing can.
>>16790367>5. By 1, this is only possible if G experienced being fucked by me>5. Thus, I fucked G.You're making a logical leap here from "God experienced being fucked by me" to "I experienced fucking God". F for effort.
>>16790937Well then, you'll have to find other ways of losing or not losing your virginity.>>16790939>I experienced fucking GodI didn't state that exactly. I may have been unconscious while fucking God and the proof still goes through.
>>16790943You claim:>I will demonstrate how you can lose your virginityLosing one's virginity is a formative experience, not just a static state of affairs. Without the qualia associated with losing your virginity to God, you did not lose your virginity to God as per your own premises.
>>16790948>as per your own premises.Not really. You need this new premise that you added>Losing one's virginity is a formative experienceI just don't have to accept this premise.
>>16790367You will never experience a pussy or bussy, so you will always be a virgin, sorry OP.
>>16790956Sorry, but my proof shows that I fucked the best of all pussies/bussies.
>>16790958Can you describe the experience?
>>16790964You can't describe qualias but if you want to know what it feels like, you too can lose your virginity by accepting the premises in my post.
>>16790966Some people are emotionally damaged. How could someone, say soccer mom, recover from an accident involving their daughter using this tool? Assume she is willing to accept it is possible to lose your virginity of multiple volitions (stfu Spike)
>>16791198I don't understand your question
>>16792657Are you familiar with any trope, eg., soccer mom?
>>16793636Yes, but I don't see the relation to the thread.
>>16790917God isn't any less of a scientific topic then any other alien life form
