It’s almost like it’s a religion. Religious doctrines from some jungle tribe probably have better true/false hit rates than scientist claims (faith)
Forced enshitification
>>16792652the darker anything gets, the more it turns to shit. This is a universal law
>>16792652the funny part is, the exact opposite is true. White babies die more when not cared for by white doctors. I cant remember the source though so dont quote me as it was a few years ago all of this was brought to my attention
>>16792652There are hundreds of billions in funding on the line so of course there's going to be a lot of fake trash if they can get away with it.
Everyone itt is a Russian bot. Fact-informed reality experts is at the core of sacred democracy and that makes it science and good and correct.
>>16792652The civil rights movement.
>>16792652In the real sciences (physics, engineering, chemistry, and to a degree biology) you expect hypotheses that are proposed the end up being wrong, often taking decades or sometimes centuries before they're conclusively disproved and replaced with a better, more predictive hypothesis. Sure there are cases of fraud, but this is rare. In the so-called "social sciences" (really, philosophy masquerading as science), this typically isn't the case, here you have a stunning assortment of cases that were just out and out fraudulent, worse, since these people are philosophers, they cling to their hypothesis with a kind of fervor you only typically see amongst the religious.The real sciences need to be understood to be separate from the philosophical nonsense pretending to be science. There are still problems, sure, journals that only accept noval results are a massive problem. But these are structural problems that can be fixed. With the "social sciences" the foundation is rotten, these people don't want to do science, they want to do philosophy. But at the same time they want their ideas to be given the same weight as a rigourous scientific finding.
>>16792652It is easier to get promotion by all out forgery than by hard work.>>16792662I would be astonished to see any such reserarch being published the way the world is run today.
>>16792652I think a new form of seeing science or at least have some kind of awekening around the 2000s , but its just blatanly pretending to be normal science and acedemia. and its not inherently bad , "real science is still real" , but the reason this thing wants the tittle of normal science and to not be knowed , its because its a masive theiving nigger that needs this confusion to get away with its toomfulery. its still problably nesesary as a exust pipe to some kind of modern memetic autism though.
>>16792660what if black people pain themselves blue , will thier iq incrise
