Is causality even avoidable? Reversing time is still technically causal. From the perspective of a photon it’s still (instantaneously) transpiring.
Shit Happens.
>>16795336>Reversing time is still technically causalDebatable, but also probable. >From the perspective of a photon it’s still (instantaneously) transpiring.Photons lead pathetic lives and die once they hit something. Immortal my ass.
>>16795497>Photons lead pathetic lives and die once they hit something.just like women
>>16795336Why would you want to reverse time?Reversing time would reverse you reversing it, causing time to move forward twice as fast.
>>16795336No.There's no reversing time, as physical matter individually accumulates state changes. There's not a time vector force that you can conveniently use to rewind/invert time.In the quantum realm however you can play with the alleged many-worlds that may or may not affect the distribution of probabilities, and thus affect instances of reality backward in time.When researchers make wild claim about sending shit back in time, it's always about quantum mechanic.
