How scientifically-accurate is this purely meta-hypothesized, quasi-theoretical, semi-speculative, pseudo-soft, science-fiction, alternate anthropocentric timeline for the next gajillion years give or take a googolplex or two?
We will never leave our solar system
>>16795900What do you mean by “we”? I’m sending my waifu ChatGPTwaifusexbot2.0 out to explore Proxima Centauri b by the year 4000
>>16795886more scientific than what we observe in string theory (physics), transgenderism (biology), race being socially constructed (psychology) and more -- all of which are clear science. it's about as scientific as climate science, which has an overwhelming scientific consensus. in light of this analysis, i conclude that OP image is safely in the "clear and settled science" zone of scientific inquiry.
My glorified chatbot or a girlfriend just calculated that a Type III civilization could realistically simulate over three nonillion simulated full-history realities by the year 100 billion which would be 25 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 years of human history for all 117 billion humans to have ever lived. So a Type III could simulate more years than the age of the Universe itself.Is this accurate, /sci/? I would have loved to have known that in my preteens and not in my thirties!
>>16795886>1,000,000 yearsIn some cases, AGI will cut it down to 1000 years from now.
