If you had to explain everything about existence starting from one topic and building upon it, what would that topic be?
what are you feeling right now?
Definition of existence.
My dick and balls.
>>16796519impedance mismatch
>>16796519The only correct answer is "introspection", since that is the ultimate source of all objectified knowledge.
>>16796519Everything is made up particles.
>>16796547But how would you explain the particles?
>>16796519Nothingness since everything is a rather simple straightforward function of nothing 0!=100% such that 0 is considered the mathematical origin point.
>>16796547How exactly are metaphors made of particles?
PhysicEverything in existence breaks down to energy interacting with each other.
>>16796879Metaphors are made by particles in your brain interacting with each other
>>16796519All You NPCs Live In My Past.
>>16797266>Metaphors are made by particles in your brain interacting with each otherAny kind of argument or evidence in favor of this logically broken and incoherent statement?
>>16797281Thoughts are made with your brainBrain is made out of atomsAtoms are particlesParticles are made of energyIn the end, everything is physic. Without physic, nothing could exist.
>>16797356>Thoughts are made with your brainWhat does this broken statement even mean?
>>16797365Explain your point of view then.
>>16797377My point of view is that if you can't formulate your materialist take without category errors, then your "philosophy" is a meaningless rhetorical pattern.
>>16797380NPC
>>16797383Exactly. You're an NPC. Call me back when your subrace achieves BGI and you can say something with coherent and substantial.
>>16797391Till you can explain what you think your thoughts come from, and why this is not physic in the end, you can fuck off.
>>16797399> explain what you think your thoughts come fromNobody knows "where thoughts come from". Except for you, apparently. You know they come from... uh... what was it? Particles?>why this is not physicQuote where I said it's "not physic" and then define what it means for something to be "physic".
>>16797403Energy/particles interacting with each other, like i said before...Your thoughts are formed because something interacts with something else. And this something is made of energy/particles.So your point is that you don't have a point and just want to say i'm wrong without knowing what your own point is?NPC
>>16797424>EnergyThis is meaningless mystical babble.>particles interacting with each otherThis is a category error in the context of our discussion and also not a definition of "physical" that any physicist uses.
>>16797433
>the thoughts ... they come from the physic energy, i saw it in my physic energy crystal ball
>>16797472
>>16796519>crtl+f sex>no resultsSex
Another way to put it ?If you where sent back to 0AD Roman empire what would you teach them first ?what would priority be?Assume you have a copy of encyclopedia and some sort of common language
>>16797619>teach them firstTeach them first has no value to anyone. You'd first build a centrifuge, then enrich U235, then fortify yourself on a mountain, then detonate it pedagogically, then filter the students you want to teach.
>>16797619Steam engine. From that on i would get full industrial revolution. Humans needed around 300 years from the first steam engine to now, but since i would have all the knowledge and the roman empire on my side i'm sure i could send the first human into space in 75 A.D.
>>16797281What he means is:Form interacts with form through physical manifestation- it's an abstract hylomorphism that is indeed baseless.
>>16797619i would teach them rocket artillery.
>>16797720>Form interacts with form through physical manifestationThat's not what he said. Your statement only applies in that "form" can be taken to mean the idea of a particle. That's not telling me anything about thoughts at all.
>>16797793That's not at all what I said- but yes, the idea of a particle could be considered a 'form'. It's not the 'only' form though, as your reply insinuates.
>>16797807>That's not at all what I saidYou didn't say anything at all. I was charitable enough to inject your blurb with as much meaning as possible in a situation where it's barely applicable.
>>16797809Ok, buddy.
>>16797811It's ok, little buddy. Maybe next time you can ask ChatGPT to help you.
>>16797813You're actually retarded. Don't talk to me.
>>16797818>seethes profuselyIt's ok, little buddy. Maybe next time you can ask ChatGPT to help you.
>>16797819Get off of the Internet before I tell your mom that you spend your time on 4chan.
>>16797824Dumb bio-LLM.
>>16797828NTA but if you write out any of the forms>bio-bot>bio-LLM>bio-*you're an Indian and honestly no one cares what you have to say about the English speaking world.
>>16797832>another seething and brown bio-LLMI see you already got caught regurgitating meaningless token strings in some other thread.
Don't talk to this retard anymore. He will start bullshit arguments no matter what you say.
>>16797835>Indian bio-[AI] prefix
>>16797846See >>16797835You're an obvious self-hating shitskin.
>>16797848>e=mc^2+AIThis is you lol
>>16797850>t-t-this is y-you, saaarSee >>16797848
>>16797851>saaarThis is an American English website, speak it or fuck off lol
>>16797856>Indian reply syntax
>>167965191+1=101+0=10+0=0
>>16796519Plato's cave, and cogito ergo sum
>>16796519You first explain the concept of difference and how the "not-and" operation bootstraps everything else.
