https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/30333717251375994>Re-centering pleasure at the margins therefore confronts both colonial and heteropatriarchal logics, insisting that children’s own accounts of what feels good, exciting, or frightening are legitimate sources of knowledge. Thus, letting children “do” sexual pleasure in their own way is vital for their sense of their own agency. Yet, only by tracing the circuits in which race, class, gender, and age secure or foreclose pleasure can we theorize children’s sexual worlds.>When sexual pleasure is viewed from the lives of those who are generationally minoritized, its contours shift: It appears as a practice of resistance and an arena where alternative futures are rehearsed. Children’s sexual curiosity and pleasure is a radical position from the margins—often without a language or developed concepts. It is time for sexualities research to hone in on the meanings of sexual pleasure for children and young people, their experiences with creating and navigating their worlds, and their voices in telling their own stories.
why do leftoids need to live?
ew
>>16796742and somehow they continue to claim that rightoids are the creepy pedos. "iron law of woke projection" remains undefeated
A lot of bullshit nonsense just to say “sexy children cause pedophilia”
>>16796736>University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africawoah
>>16796742>is weirdly loyal to another group of pedophiles bc they're more powerfulYeah, we got an American over here
>Deevia Bhana and Stefan Lucke>a millennial woman with problem glasses and an ugly guy who looks like his hard drive is overflowing with cpIt's always the ones you most expect.
>>16797065She looks like she would be caught for pedophilia while working at an elementary school.
>>16796736>Science>SociologyLol. Lmao even.
>>16797065>Problem glassesThanks, I'm adding that one to my lexicon. And Stefan looks like James Murray if he was a weird uncle that always wanted you to sit on his lap.
why are they like this?
>>16797153
>>16796736>feminist, queer perspectives>research from south africa
>>16797065>a millennial woman with problem glasses and an ugly guy who looks like his hard drive is overflowing with cpActual intelligent post contesting sources, as you always should, from some random South African "college" a/k/a Prawn School diploma mill and it's deviant faculty member publications. /thread
>>16797153>>16797153>why are they like this?look at the keywords of this "article." My take on peer review for this trash is pier review, as in biblical millstones around necks, let nature take its course. it's one thing to suggest emerging awareness of sexuality is complex and multifactorial, quite another for adults to try to exploit it for some social engineering experiment proven to be a tumor on a healthy society. ironic coming from the ASA. guess they join the APA along with many more trusted organizations with on a list of the compromised and part of the long march through the institutions. 6 But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea.Matthew 18:6
>>16796736>KeywordsImagine being a Feminist in 2005. Then in 2015 transvestite males start keywording as Feminist. Then in 2025 adults who sexualize girls start keywording as Feminist. It's a testament to XX genetics that there aren't way more radicalized Feminist mass shooters.
>>16798461>XX genetics that there aren't way more radicalized Feminist mass shootersthey'd rather bitch and complain and irritate the man enough to actually do work than complete it themselves. also, feminism, thanks you ole 1920s suffrage unfuckable hags that started this shit.
>>16796790>Rightoids are creepy pedosThat’s true
>>16796736When you accidentally catch your kids wiggling their jigglies, just close the door and walk away.You do not need to hit them with a belt, bible, or 24/7 surveillance. Lighten up, Francis.
>>16798482That's kinda what the article is about lmaoI highly recommend all the turbo autists here to actually read it, it's pretty short and tame, there's nothing even remotely shocking or controversial in the article, the reactions to it kind of prove the necessity of it existing
>>16798472It wasn't the unfuckable Merkel hags who got their imaginary husbands to buy into it.
>>16798494>That's kinda what the article is about lmao No shit. Almost like someone read it.
>>16798482>You do not need to hit them with a belt, bible, or 24/7 surveillance.or publish an "article." lol
>>16798482Yep, you need constant demonic administration of the quadratic equation, but the unraveling of your sexual health is completely not important.I wish I could say science pseuds were astound, but this is par for the course. Such stooges.
>>16798458Jesus Fuck, Grandpa. Take your bible and noose back to 1920.
>>16798508I understand that you do not understand. That was already understood from earlier.
>>16798502>Merkel hags who got their imaginary husbands to buy into it.all of the real Germanic stock died iin the early half of the 20th century in both war war 1 and war war 2. it's pretty obvious
>>16798509Put it back in your pants, moron. You're not doing that here anymore.
>>16798510>>16798514go back to reddi.t you mouth-breathing pedophile
>>16798515>they would have won too>had they not lost>twiceKek.
>>16798519>but i can't read the article> i can't readKek.
>>16798520so now they let the womyns be in charge, doing such a great job! more power to the EU and one world government. WEF intern getting paid to post?
>>16798515You're German and that was too close to home. Okay, it wasn't the dried out old American spinster prunes in late 19th century America who got their imaginary husbands to support Seneca Falls. It was the hot, wet, fertile, married ones.
>>16798522a post so stupid really not even worth replying, but since you are such a lonely aspie tard needing a D2 microdose, here, it took 11 seconds to type this. enjoy the high, it's all you get
>>16798524>wormymsnymsIs this thread in old english, middle german, or modern gaelic?
>>16798494>>16798503Quit your fucking lying. That synopsis is NOTHING like what's written in the abstract, and people are justifiably calling out the authors. You're just as bad. Even IF the article is about what you say it is (it isn't), that doesn't excuse the duplicitous language in the abstract (which is actually an accurate summary of what's in the paper). Here, let me explain in a language you dumb fucks can hopefully understand:THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TURNING A BLIND EYE TO "KIDS WILL BE KIDS" (when they're TEENAGERS) AND TELLING ADULTS TO LET KIDS DIDDLE EACH OTHERHere, let me try again by lowering the IQ of the message even more>Not interfering in what you observed via punishment is NOT the same as encouraging the behavior in the first place before it happened Jesus fucking Christ you predators need to be publicly hanged, just like those pedo authors. Here, I'll try one more fucking time WHEN THEY USE THE LANGUAGE KIDS AND CHILDREN THEY ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT TEENAGERS
>>16798529So what about the article do you disagree with, faggot?
>>16798528>You're Germannope.tiff>>16798528>ho got their imaginary husbands to support Seneca Falls. It was the hot, wet, fertile, married ones.try again. it was the street screaming fat old hags that started this shit, metastasiized into >>16796736>>16798531>Is this thread in old english, middle german, or modern gaelic?yes.>>16798535>So what about the article do you disagree with, faggot?um, you did read it, didn't you? after which you do so, you realize thus that it was you whom was the faggot all along
>>16798533>i did not read the article>i do mot even know what most of those words mean>CAPS TIME!
>>16798540>nope, haven't read it
>>16798543>>nope, haven't read ityour brain will thank you later.
>>16798545>i thank my brain for not letting me think or talk about the dirty, naughty, bad parts
>>16798540Lol okay you're defensive about Merkel for no reason. Point stands. It wasn't the dried out old American spinster prunes in late 19th century America who got their imaginary husbands to support Seneca Falls. It was the hot, wet, fertile, married ones.
>>16798541Oh I read the paper. And I'm about to tear you a new asshole in front of everyone here. See e.g. some quotes from the paper>Children are stereotyped as asexual and innocent; concerns about child sexual abuse and children’s undue sexualization dominate discourses about young sexualities, while children are actually sexually exploited by adults worldwide.>Yet, research has long illustrated that pleasure and childhood sexuality are not inimical to each other There's no way to spin this one, pedo. It gets even worse>We aim to demonstrate that attending to pleasure is indispensable for understanding how childhood sexualities are lived, policed, and transformed. Childhood sexual pleasure is a terrain where domination is felt, contested, resisted, and sometimes overturned. Attending to that terrain enriches our understanding of how childhood sexualities are lived and offers new routes toward childhood sexual justice within policy and rightsThis is clearly talking about legal rights for children sexuality. This can only mean with adults. No, elaboration is not needed as long as you have more than three brain cells.>Scholars of sexuality education (Allen 2012, 2024; Renold, Ringrose, and Egan 2015) have since explored ways to integrate erotics into curricula, contending that acknowledging pleasure can enhance young people’s understanding of healthy sexuality and makes such sexual literacy more tangible. More recent scholarship has begun to insist that sexual pleasure is a key site to reimagine sexuality where power, inequality, and the possibility of becoming “otherwise” are negotiated They literally want to change grade school curricula to encourage sexual exploration of children. You're sick and fucking deranged individual.
>>16796736Yeah I can pretty fucking solid bet a study this naive was not gonna predict my decapitation fetish.
>>16798541>Bhana’s (2007, 2016a) research is simply to listen to children—an approach that might seem obvious, but which was relatively rare in an arena dominated by adult-driven/adultist agendas. Rather than focusing narrowly on sexual risk, Bhana and colleagues (see also Bhana 2023; Janak, Bhana, and Lakhan 2023; Bhana, Skovdal, and Govender 2025) have explored how children themselves understand sexuality as thoughtful, agentic social actors who are aware of risks but also articulate their investments in pleasure and desire.Here we see clear admittance from the authors about the "agency" children have on this. You're disgusting and I hope you die. Sooner rather than lately, and painfully, I fucking hope.
Good luck defending this one, fucking pedo>Acknowledging children as pleasurable beings does not negate harmRight from the fucking article. Oh I'm sure you read it alright, jerked off to it, and then lied to everyone about what it says. Genuinely, do society a favor and kill yourself.
>Sexual pleasure and meaning are integral to understanding why children do what they do, and how they can be supported to lead healthier, happier lives. By bringing the margins to the center, we not only correct historical biases in scholarship but also unfold more inclusive approaches to bringing children and young people to the center of research, debate, and interventions around sexualities.So let's recap. They spend words words words saying children have agency, are sexual creatures and what should adults do? SUPPORT AND LEAD THEM TO "HAPPIER" LIVES. Disgusting pedos. What's gonna be your derail now, pedo? I've proven I've read the paper. Can't use that one anymore.
>>16798580You can make your point more efficiently by saying kids have opioid receptors but shouldn't be exposed to heroin.
>>16798585I'd rather tell pedos to kill themselves and to stop fucking lying.
>>16798595Equally efficient. You could have also done that in one post.
>>16798604I'm thorough and want to leave no doubt in the minds of lurkers.
>>16798609Does >>16798595 leave any doubt?
>>16798571? "Children can feel pleasure and saying so doesn't negate the fact that it can cause harm"Is this really that upsetting to you? Were you touched as a child and how you are sperging out at this article?
>well, you see, chud>there are good pedos and there are bad pedos>but first we need to recognize that children actually like having sex with adults, ok?>i'm not saying this negate the damage done by bad pedos, of course>just that we just need to define and distinguish ethical ways of having sex with children
>>16798643NTA but science presumes experimental data.
>>16798643>Children can consent to sex, but that doesn't negate the harm that comes from raping them in without their consent. Understand?
Ok little Timmy really had a rough time with uncle Tyrone and now he can't talk about children and sexuality since it will just trigger his PTSD
>>16798566The caricature, the caricature, the caricature.Well played.
>>16796742what makes you think they're on the left have been incredibly sex negative since 2014
Oy vey, it's pic related all over again! Someone do something about this Nazi thread!
>>16798670>what makes you think they're on the leftThe text.
>>16796742>>16798824>american liberals>leftistsyou amerimutts are all mentally ill
>>16798915He said the line
>>16798916the mutt babbled something
>>16796736Sounds like Academia wants to fuck some little kids.
>>16796736>This article repositions childhood sexualities within a pleasure-centered, globally oriented, and power-aware frame informed by feminist, queer, and decolonial perspectivesliterally wotget rid of these two people.
>>16798458>ironic coming from the ASA. guess they join the APA along with many more trusted organizations with on a list of the compromised and part of the long march through the institutions.Unironically the problem is pedophiles in academia, since they view this shit as a backdoor to try to gain social acceptance as a means of having sexual access to children. Anyone who does this sort of research should have their harddrives inspected by the authorities as part of peer review or list that they want to fuck kids as part of their disclosed conflicts of interest.
>>16798494>Definitely nothing shocking about two adults "attending to childhood pleasure" in their feminist propaganda piece.
this really feels like it was a paper written as a joke
>>16796736>settled sciencedoes NOT exist!
>>16796736How does one become a child sex ““researcher””? Do you have to get a degree in Talmud studies?
>>16799387you personally research the topic from childhood
>>16799379If I cook you for ten minutes in boiling water anywhere on earth—even Mt. Everest where water boils at 69C—you'll die. This is settled medical science.
>>16799394>This is settled medical sciencegot any peer-reviewed proof?
>>16796736wow excuse me are you still talking about epstein?
>>16799397Peer review isn't a science thing, it's a publishing thing that honestly doesn't even go far enough to gatekeep trash. Academic journals are supposed to be letters between colleagues who already know each other. We should revert to the "communicated by" method.
>>16796736>colonial and heteropatriarchal logics,>generationally minoritized, its contours shift>radical position from the margins—often without>their voices in telling their own stories.Not even AI could write this badly.>>16797065With the above wording there is no doubt.
>>16799455Given that they're both white in a country that may or may not be genociding whites, and where it's not all that uncommon for blacks to rape arbitrary children as a folkloric cure for HIV, and given that the language is almost absurdly Sokalian, what are the odds that it's a cry for an international spotlight rather than a serious paper? Maybe 50/50?
>>16799387>da jews You're confusing theorists with experimentalists, Anon.
The west let's kids consent to chemical castration, how the fuck is that in any way less insane than seggs? Slippery slope.
>>16798023why does he have to talk about trump so brazenly like that?
>>16799495You're still doing this for free even as the NGO money dries up?
>>16799502that's crazy bro. where are epstein files?
>>16799506Why tho?
>>16796736ever stop and wonder what kind of things Nazi Germany burned in public gatherings?It was things like this
>>16799905So which side are you arguing here?
>>16798918>Noooo saying "decolonial intersectional feminist antifa" isnt being a leftist !!!!
>>16796736Don't hurt themHow hard can it be?
>>16800530The authors of OP would argue the infant would have kept crying if it didn't consent to the mutilation.
>>16797153spiteful mutants™
>>16800051
