Why is there no genetic research on what genes are responsible for women developing sexy features like wide hips, long thick legs, strong glutes, large breasts, and so on? This feels like something that is being taken for granted when there is clearly a type preferred for breeding. Is someone forbidding it in the worry that someone will attempt selective breeding to try and create the human equivalent of breeding chickens? Or is it just too niche or low profile research?
>>16797885>wanted: white girls with fat asses for research purposes.
>>16797888By focusing on one part, you end up neglecting the whole. While there are many body types, especially among athlete specializations, the question of how many of these are healthy or fit for normal life or the biological purpose of a female human is another question entirely.
Addendum; quite frankly yes, I have grown curious enough in this age of extinction to wish I could extract cell specimens and sequence the codes of every attractive woman I encounter in real life or on the internet to try and observe some common pattern. That includes observations of all conventionally attractive traits, but also all the colorful traits such as hair colors, eye colors, freckles, hand shapes, fingernails, navels, and everything else you can possibly think of. No details should go unscrutinized in my book.
>>16797885Pear woman master race is the only valid future.
>>16797885Best: hourglass & pearNot bad: trianglesYuck, but would still fuck: rectangle & round
>>16798123What is the point of rectangle (fridge) women anyway?
Pear and hourglass are the same picture.
>>16798190No, hourglass means shoulders are around equal to hips, pear means they are wider than shoulders.
>>16797885It is a common misconception that women are sexy and/or beautiful. This is a construct of the male brain. Males mate more frequently with females whom they think are beautiful, resulting in a population of males selected to find females attractive when they are, in fact, a smelly stupid conglomerate of useful holes.
>>16797885That image isn’t a good representation of the shapes.
>>16797885If you prefer anything other than rectangle on the front and profile then you are a nonce
More things need to go pear shaped.
>>16797885which is the most digusting, inverted triangle or rectangle?
>>16798348this just goes to show that wide hips are the most important feature for a woman
>>16798129I wouldn't fuck roundAnd rectangle only if it's a spinner
>>16798348your image is trash OP's is much better
>>16797885because you can only do epidemiological studies which arent specific enough to make distinctionsyou dont know whether its produced by hormone exposure in the womb, childhood situation, birth control, diet, exercise condition.In fact most medical studies cannot control enough factors to designate genes as being causal.Humans are vastly more complicated than genes = outcome
>>16798928>you dont know whether its produced by hormone exposure in the womb, childhood situation, birth control, diet, exercise condition.Doesn't stop them from trying to genetically engineer super soldiers though, does it?
>>16798123>>16798129Patrician tastes.
>>16798163tomboys/amazons
