https://motivacredibilitatis.substack.com/p/eucharistic-miracle-of-lanciano?utm_source=post-banner&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&triedRedirect=trueThis is the second installment in a series of articles surveying the evidence for Catholic miracles. My objective is to present the miracle case for Catholicism in a way that is rigorous enough to persuade those that are strongly predisposed towards skepticism. That means empirical data has to be inferred from primary sources and every skeptical explanation has to be excluded by multiple lines of evidence.
>>16798526>?utm_source=post-banner&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&triedRedirect=trueThis, gentlemen, is the signature of the Anti-Christ.Ye, he will make a shitpost of his thread and your's. Shun him, drive him back into his jungle lair...for he is the harbinger of cringe.
>>16798606It may be long but it's not self doxxing!
>>16798615Our Lord the Lawgiver will decide your fate you damned, dirty, hueman!It starts out long, then forgettablr, then its habitual, then Satan roams freely like the beastman you are!
>>16798526>My objective is to present the miracleAs soon as you scientifically prove it occured its no longer a miracle but a phenomenon of Physics and Probability.>to persuade those that are strongly predisposed towards skepticismBy confirming "IFLS" Reddit crowd?Reverse Engineering *how* it occured is more complex and in minute actions that couldnt have occured without astronomicsl probabilities exceeding stars in the sky. At a certain point the numbers exceed rationality and a conscious actor making a small, efforted, event, is more coherent and sane.Proving science to Atheists is meanless, they dont even understand what science is...even ones with PhDs or even Professorships.
>The first known reports of the event date to 1574 and do not specify the exact year in which it would have occurred, but some believe that certain historical circumstances allow it to be placed chronologically eight centuries earlier, between 730 and 750. The Byzantine emperor Leo III the Isaurian, who reigned from 717 to 741Oof. 1500s of a 700s event?>Since there are no contemporary sources, the details and not even the name of the protagonist of the events are knownSource not found?I looked that up because I read this;>In 1888, the relics were secured with episcopal seals. When the Archbishop of Lanciano authorized a scientific investigation in 1970, the seals were brokenI didnt see where it said what was even sealed.If only I could read Italian I would review the Cardiologist's paper...I mean, I still am just not read-read it.
>>16798526Its confirming that it was actual blood and flesh, but that was what it was supposed to have turned into, the original presenters bringing anything else would have been illogical...although a ruse having been played could have accured at some point in between. Like the shroud of Turin appears to have been.Either way, miracles are for the faithful, not the corrupted masses. In fact...these relics and those like them are for those very masses...not those who walk with God, because God is a living being all around you, not in an inanimate object from ancient past....where God watches you show love to a stone or wooden idol and then ignores Him the rest of the day.
...as predicted in the 29th scroll, 6th verse.Beware the beastman.
