[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: G1fau55aIAAILd8.jpg (98 KB, 833x1250)
98 KB
98 KB JPG
Should america increase the space budget by billions? In 1961 JFK announced that america will land on the moon in a decade. Then that decade was spent toiling away incredibly hard, pouring every resource into space research which is what allowed humans to go from suborbital flights to walking on the moon in just 8 years. But since then progress in space colonization has been reduced to a snail's pace. We've been talking about mars for 30 years but still can't land a person there. Missions keep getting cancelled and delayed by years repeatedly. Things that we can do with current technology are infeasible only because of budget.

As a country built on exploration, should america make it's main focus space colonization? If hundreds of billions of dollars were redirected to nasa, then the US would probably reach very far in just the next two decades
>>
>>16800189
>Spend X Billions colonizing space
>20 years later they declare independence
What are you gonna do, send spaceships to glass the moon?
No point repeating the mistakes of the brits
>>
>>16800266
It would be a very long time before they were self sufficient. There's no living off the land on the Moon.
>>
>>16800327
This, plus we wouldn't be contending with an existing local population whose society we trampled and hopefully we'd be bright enough to not give the colonists the feeling they were being exploited. As long as those involved identify most strongly as US citizens there's no problem.
>>
File: Lunarians.jpg (115 KB, 706x391)
115 KB
115 KB JPG
>>16800351
Complete Lunartarian erasure.
>>16800189
There needs to be a new Cold War to instigate things.
>>
>>16800189
There's no real incentive to do so so no. It's far more sensible to just invest into space science than start up some prestige project moon colony that's a money sink on life support for 2 years before being abandoned in shame.
>>
Space budget should be increased by billions.
Cancer and heart disease research should be increased by billions and treatment should be fully covered for all taxpaying citizens.
Nuclear power plants should be constructed and electricity delivered free of charge to all taxpaying citizens.
To pay for it, international aid and welfare should be slashed to zero and all illegals should be removed.
>>
>>16801134
this. so much damn waste with nothing to show for it
>>
>>16800189
There's zero chance of this happening especially with how brown the US is. Money will be increasingly funneled to gibs and funding for space stuff will be attacked as a waste.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.