[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


🎉 Happy Birthday 4chan! 🎉


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 57893492085723904.jpg (1.22 MB, 2184x3264)
1.22 MB
1.22 MB JPG
Somewhere far away up in the night sky, caring nothing for your rustled jimmies, it rotates.
>>
>>16805690
its possible but why? why even think this up?
>>
>>16805690
something something tidal forces
>>
File: 1730161547729.jpg (25 KB, 474x316)
25 KB
25 KB JPG
>>16805690
Pretty much exactly that, OP.
>>
>>16805690
kek
>>
>>16805690
it's just very unlikely
>>
Could there also be a habitable planet orbiting that entire contraption?
>>
File: 1735245987099.jpg (32 KB, 474x266)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
>>16805956
>Blanet much?
Just watch the movie.
>>
>>16805690
Not stable. There's no gravitational force countering the heat pressure to keep the center from approaching the black hole. It will collapse into a disk.

>>16805706
An accretion disk is not a star and only has fusion by impact and not pressure.
>>
>>16805956
The habitable planet would need to be fairly far away and won't be receiving much light. It would be more likely to orbit a red dwarf that orbits the black hole.
>>
>>16805690
That seems rather unstable.
Like why wouldn't the system wobble in such a way that the torroid star would fall into the event horizon within a few million years?
>>
>>16806473
More unstable than that, the center of the torus immediately falls towards the black hole.
>>
>>16806482
Oh, okay, yea then.
Orbital mechanics is way far out of my wheelhouse, but that shit just looks unstable.
Does the system have any weird or interesting properties before it collapes, though?
Like, if you just magically poofed it into existence such that it was perfectly aligned, what would it be like for that small fraction of time before it falls apart?
>>
>>16805690
That's basically a galaxy of stars, orbiting the galaxy's black hole
>>
What exactly is supposed to make the matter at the center of the band dense enough to experience fusion? Also it couldn't possibly be that thick or wide, particles at the "top" and "bottom" of the band would have different orbital inclinations and cross the plane of the ecliptic, material at the inner and outer sides would have different orbital speeds, and the whole thing would be a chaotic mess that tears itself apart until it becomes a flat disk of hot gas orbiting the black hole.
>>
>>16806448
Says who?
>b-but we've seen every black hole
All those catalogs of gas dense black hole neighborhoods.
>>
>>16806923
>Says who?
everyone who knows anything about orbital mechanics down to and including people who've played fucking kerbal space program.
>>
>>16806927
>it literally works in the Simulation
So we agree.
>>
>>16806933
it doesn't work in any simulation
>>
>>16806938
I literally have it working on mine!
>>
>>16805865
>3 body problem solutions
I never saw any before. Solutions 5 and 20 are similar. S20 and S1 seem almost the same. S13 and S10 are simple.
>>
>>16805865
cool graphic
where can I find more of this
>>
>>16805865
2nd column 1st row looks fake as fuck
>>
File: 3 body problem solutions.mp4 (1.04 MB, 1000x800)
1.04 MB
1.04 MB MP4
>>16807235
>>16807559
>>16807582
here
>>
>>16806482
What if it spins faster?
>>
>>16807667
This must be for stars only right? I suspect more than a few of these would rip any planet to pieces via tidal in relatively short order. Especially top row first from the left.
>>
>>16807694
yes
>>
>>16807694
>stars
its for point particles which dont exist except maybe in the quanum world,
and it uses newtonian physics not relativistic general relativity. So its likely none of these orbits exist



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.