Somewhere far away up in the night sky, caring nothing for your rustled jimmies, it rotates.
>>16805690its possible but why? why even think this up?
>>16805690something something tidal forces
>>16805690Pretty much exactly that, OP.
>>16805690kek
>>16805690it's just very unlikely
Could there also be a habitable planet orbiting that entire contraption?
>>16805956>Blanet much?Just watch the movie.
>>16805690Not stable. There's no gravitational force countering the heat pressure to keep the center from approaching the black hole. It will collapse into a disk.>>16805706An accretion disk is not a star and only has fusion by impact and not pressure.
>>16805956The habitable planet would need to be fairly far away and won't be receiving much light. It would be more likely to orbit a red dwarf that orbits the black hole.
>>16805690That seems rather unstable.Like why wouldn't the system wobble in such a way that the torroid star would fall into the event horizon within a few million years?
>>16806473More unstable than that, the center of the torus immediately falls towards the black hole.
>>16806482Oh, okay, yea then.Orbital mechanics is way far out of my wheelhouse, but that shit just looks unstable.Does the system have any weird or interesting properties before it collapes, though?Like, if you just magically poofed it into existence such that it was perfectly aligned, what would it be like for that small fraction of time before it falls apart?
>>16805690That's basically a galaxy of stars, orbiting the galaxy's black hole
What exactly is supposed to make the matter at the center of the band dense enough to experience fusion? Also it couldn't possibly be that thick or wide, particles at the "top" and "bottom" of the band would have different orbital inclinations and cross the plane of the ecliptic, material at the inner and outer sides would have different orbital speeds, and the whole thing would be a chaotic mess that tears itself apart until it becomes a flat disk of hot gas orbiting the black hole.
>>16806448Says who?>b-but we've seen every black holeAll those catalogs of gas dense black hole neighborhoods.
>>16806923>Says who?everyone who knows anything about orbital mechanics down to and including people who've played fucking kerbal space program.
>>16806927>it literally works in the SimulationSo we agree.
>>16806933it doesn't work in any simulation
>>16806938I literally have it working on mine!
>>16805865>3 body problem solutionsI never saw any before. Solutions 5 and 20 are similar. S20 and S1 seem almost the same. S13 and S10 are simple.
>>16805865cool graphicwhere can I find more of this
>>168058652nd column 1st row looks fake as fuck
>>16807235>>16807559>>16807582here
>>16806482What if it spins faster?
>>16807667This must be for stars only right? I suspect more than a few of these would rip any planet to pieces via tidal in relatively short order. Especially top row first from the left.
>>16807694yes
>>16807694>starsits for point particles which dont exist except maybe in the quanum world,and it uses newtonian physics not relativistic general relativity. So its likely none of these orbits exist
