What are our thoughts about MIT Cognitive Phd researcher Greta Tuckute's body of research?
>>16805873>What are our thoughts about MIT Cognitive Phd researcher Greta Tuckute's bodyI can't tell from that cropped picture.
>>16805885lmao
>>16805873maybe a fucking background on her would be nice, OP
>>16805873Honestly, she’s one of the sharper people in the Fedorenko/Kanwisher orbit — actually doing model-based cognitive neuroscience instead of vague blob chasing. The LLM–brain alignment stuff is solid: good controls, predictive modeling, no hype beyond correlation. That said, it’s still correlation — BOLD ≠neurons — and “driving/suppressing” language is overstated since it’s stimulus selection, not stimulation. Her sentence memorability paper is neat but could use deeper cross-linguistic validation. Overall: technically rigorous, mainstream-credible, and moving the field in a good direction, but the usual fMRI caveats apply.
>>16806196this anon reads books, i'm telling you
>>16805873Her research is nice enough on the face of itAs for her body of research, I am going to need a fuller pictureGive me a more comprehensive picture and I might be able to squeeze out some data
>>16806200Based on the emdashes I'm guessing >>16806196 reads chatGPT instead.
>>16806226shit, you're right! my bad
>>16806200https://youtu.be/_uMEE7eaaUA
>>16805885more data is needed
