Why are Europeans the only population with a negative Rhesus factor?Naturally, rhesus negative women can't reproduce at a replacement level with rhesus positive men, so why are they considered the same species at all?Why do everyone deny these simple scientific facts?
>>16806960>Why are Europeans the only population with a negative Rhesus factor?Because the mutation originated in Europe>Naturally, rhesus negative women can't reproduce at a replacement level with rhesus positive mensource?
This is the best /sci/ post of the year>"rhesus negative [European] women can't reproduce at a replacement level with rhesus positive [non-European] men">the offspring of a European and a non-European will always be infertile>nobody on Earth can possibly have European admixture in the range (0%;25%]>Amerimutts and mestizos actually don't exist>discussion of the economic, sociological, and physiological effects of race mixing is moot because it is biologically impossible
>>16806981Technically correct. It's called Erythroblastosis Fetalis, or Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn in which an Rh- mother gets pregnant with an Rh+ baby that she carries to term and delivers. However, her body has now made Anti-Rh+ antibodies that can cross the placental barrier and attack all subsequent Rh+ fetuses, often causing miscarriage. Hence, the inability to "reproduce at replacement levels". We can treat it now, but when you look back on History at all the Royal(Rh-) baby deaths, it starts to add up. Not to mention other "royal disease", like hemophilia, porphyria, etc...
>>16806960I’m o- Les go jatt ftw
