what's the obsession with this conundrum? from what i gather they can't figure out of it solves every single fluid dynamics problem. well yeah? there are huge numbers of particles of course it's impossible to determine if it's universal, but you could say that about any arbitrary dynamic system with the same number of parts
>>16807409The problem is boundary value proofs. How does the fluid behave at the boundaries of its container and why?
Finding a general solution for Navier-Stokes requires inventing an entirely new field of mathematics that would equip theorists to be able to determine general solutions for systems of nonlinear PDEs and provide a path towards analytic treatment of chaotic dynamics.If you can't see why that'd be a big deal, you're on the wrong board.
>>16807478its not a big deal because it doesnt make catgirl waifus real
>>16807478Almost certainly way out of my depth here, but cant some clever mathematicians just use some fancy curve fitting on the simulated and validated data using these equations (numerically), maybe with the help from AI. So "start at the other end" kind of?
>>16807825CFD
>>16807825Fitting data that already happened to some idiosyncratic equation that touches all the data points is different than describing an equation that solves for future data. It's why stock prices, climate change, astrology, etc., can all be modeled to look like they follow certain rules while not actually following those rules. A simple version of this is that 1,2,3 could continue with the natural numbers, the non composite numbers, or really any list of numbers that get increasing bizarre and divergent from any other list.
>>16807409"""AI""" seems to have found lots of errors with these equations recently.
