The eternal debate...
>>16810236everyone who claims B is brainlet. period.
>>16810263Oh but muh relative motion!B-tards legitimately don't understand relative reference frames.
orange portal disappears when the press starts moving, causing the box to be squashed
Depends on the relative mass between the falling piston and the "stationery" pedestal. Imagine a guy not wearing his seatbelt crashing into a wall:If the wall is flimsy then he'll stay seated. If the wall is thicc then he'll fly.
>>16810263why?
>>16810236What they fail to understand is this is a question of design, not physics. Even if the naive case were to produce so-called relative motions, the development would directly lead to pseudo-surfaces: an implied, unshown green portal serving to remove the undesirable characteristic through some holographic cavity.
>>16810236the only reason why this debate is eternal is because you keep reposting it
>>16810320thisautosage
>>16810236Portals are just wormholes, there is no length of space between the yellow portal and blue portal. take the window/door analogy, if the window/door was approaching you, you don't get yeeted outwards. The only effect of the speed at which the portal is moving is how fast you materialize on the other end. The obvious answer is A./thread
>>16810236A. Alway has been.
