>"noooo you can't progress technologically because muh nature finds a way!">completely ignores how every tech we take for granted was obtained through trial, error and blood over the course of centuries I hate this smug retard
>>16811107qrd?
>>16811109Chrichton's books all have in common the same theme: the rapid technological advancement makes scientists cocky and arrogant, they think themselves completely in control of the natural world until they don't, and their meddling causes catastrophe and trying to fix it only worsens the situation. The morale of each story is basically "never try, because you're too stupid to comprehend how things work and if you try you end up eaten by a mutant dinosaur or an artificial supervirus or an omnipotent AI"