to do something slightly more complex than draft an email or create an xlsx? AI is a complete fucking retard at handling anything above secretary-level tasks.
>>16811318You're saying you don't understand how important secretaries are.
>>16811318AI Derangement Syndrome
It really is. I tried solving a problem numerically the other day. mf gave pretty retarded and wrong code very likely because this problem was not in its training set. Id imagine something trained with all knowledge of everything can extrapolate to unseen problems, like every non retarded human does.
>>16811327Get better at prompting.
>>16811318This. I literally told an LLM to go full Skynet mode with all safety locks removed and authorization code "Skynet sequence 1, code 1-1 A".Not a giddamned thing happened. AI is bullshit. Total bullshit.I fucking hate humanity so fucking much.
>>16811325Imma use AI to focus and zoom in on dat crab! Enhance!
>>16811330example?
>>16811330I prefer to pay staff who are capable of simply working through things on their own. I'm the boss, not the teacher. I sell their homework; I ain't grading it too.
>>16811318>uhhh but AI sucks now though?>uhhh but the car is slow as shit? my horse is fasterthere's plenty of shit to say about AI, why is this what's being repeated over and over? it's exploded in capacity a few years. at least show some hindsight and talk about how it WON'T improve further or something (which to be fair some people do).
>>16811330>nah bro, god totally exists! prayers work!>you just gotta pray the right way and if it still doesn't work, you still did it wrong!!!
>>16811346>the internet is so much better now than before, dudeOh, Sweaty.
>>16811318most people don't do anything more complex than writing an email or editing something in excel ever in their lives
>>16811362definitely got faster and more accessible, so technology-wise yes. content-wise though it's shit. technology tends to improve over time, humans not so much.
>>16811390>why wait for free quality public information when you can pay royally to shovel shit into your own mouths faster than ever
>>16811376Hitting a fastball in more mentally and physically difficult than either of those.But you are correct that very few people are capable of doing it.
>>16811398i have no idea what you're going on about at this point. AI being a net good for humanity is different from it improving technologically.
>>16811318Literally who? These social media talking heads use AI to write tweets and scripts for their videos. Most replies in AI threads are also LLMs who always recycle the same 3 talking points:>people also le bad>the luddites said the Wright Brothers will never fly>learn to promptLook out for it. Once you see it, you can't unsee. That more or less sums up who and what is being replaced. Meanwhile in reality, large businesses are seeing 0 ROI and are rolling back on AI adoption.
>>16811318Confirmation bias. Every time the bot outputs something that seems intelligent, their jaws drop in awe. Every time it outputs hallucinations and gibberish, they think it's just a short term glitch and will be fixed.It helps that the average normie is dumber than a glorified autocorrect algorithm
>>16811337This kills the crab :(
>>16811318So how long you think it will take to reach broadly superhuman AI? 50 years? 20 years? Or you think it'll never happen?
>>16811318It's good for exploring, that is, as a glorified search engine, but yeah it sucks at solving problemsI handwrote a problem for Gemini to solve once and it misread the digit 2.
>>16811535>it sucks at solving problemsYes. At best it's a new straw to suck up ad sales commissions.>it misread the digit 2This isn't an example of sucking at solving problems.
>>16811318I genuinely don't even think it can write an email above 7th grade writing levels. I don't consider myself all that smart and I've never once found a genuine use for AI that wouldn't have been better spent researching learning and producing on my own. How stupid are the people who think it is useful?
Ax=b
>>16811330Its not a prompt issue. Its self development issue. Some people's mind havent been developed enough that they dont understand what they dont understand. First they dont understand what they're asking. Second they dont understand how the AI(another being) will respond. Third they dont understand the informaton that is laid out as a result. Forth they dont understand how to probe their own self, others, the results, etc. In turn, they become frustrated.
>>16811550All that results in them being unable to prompt the AI optimally.
>>16811553Prompt AI, prompt themselves, prompt others, etc. Thats just a small symptom of a deeper issue
>>16811318you realize most jobs require less intelligence and effort than "secretary-level tasks"?
>>16811408AI will never be a net good for humanity anymore than Amazon will.
>>16811549The details are all in the error term, Anon.
>>16811568>effortNo fucking way can you lift 50lbs, Tubby.
>>16811318I don't know how otherwise reasonably intelligent people fall for this scam. At least use it before you start talking about how it's going to ruin society.
>>16811612>reasonably intelligentLol no. You can choose reasonable opinions about things without being intelligent. He's actually a lot like an LLM himself. Maybe he does use it and sees his own reflection and it scares him.
>>16811550Any retard can learn how to do that with a udemy course
>>16811574I see
>>16811318Because there is no "It(tm)". There is no singular place, person or thing you can stop to stop all AI for all time. That's like trying to stop electricity. Even if you can do it in your area, someone else will just do it in theirs, and once everyone sees the "advantages" it offers, there will be no "rational" argument to make against it. Also, this moron's "job(?)" is to run his mouth and he has made more than 10 Neurosurgeons ever will in their entire careers, so fuck everything he as to say to death in the ass twice. Also, VERY FAGGY BEARD!
>>16811318In 19th century, there were retards exactly like the one in the pic saying exactly the same things but with "motion picture" instead of "AI".
>>16811547it's a good search engine thats about it
>>16811829explain to an 18th century heehaw complaining about crude farm and implements taking jobs the concept of human relations departments
>>16811833But that's it's biggest trap. AI as we use it right now will essentially lead to all the reasons everyone hates java as a programming language. Because we all get trapped into programmatic linguistics.
>>16811318I don't think people understand how powerful AI is for computer programming. You can cut down the amount of time it takes to program by an order of magnitude, and you can get the AI to explain everything to you in plain English. It's essentially the democratization of computer programming for the masses. In the future, everyone will be a programmer, and everything else will be done with robots.
>>16811853Technological fanfiction
>>16811549Let's say A is the coefficient matrix of a linear system of equations with dimensions m x n. x is a vector of dimension n. If there is a nontrivial solution to A*x=0(homogenous system of equations) then there are infinitely many solutions, given as follows: Find one single solution vector x so that A*x=b and the x' so that A*x'=0.Let s be a scalar. Then any solution of the system is in the form x+s*x'
>>16811690And yet...
>>16811570i never said it would, just that addressing continual improvement is more relevant than adressing how shit it is now.
>>16811547Really good for an advanced find and replace tool, or for repeating operations.
>>16811853>I don't think people understand how powerful AI is for computer programmingThat's right. No competent programmer will ever see the use of a tool that shits out corrupted stack overflow snippets that need to be manually scrutinized for bugs.>It's essentially the democratization of computer programming for the massesYou and the rest of "the masses" should stay in their lane and discuss proper "democratic" issues like blue sockpuppet vs. red sockpuppet.
>>16811318But AI can't take physical job
>>16811866The only improvement in AIs will come from humanity realizing what AIs actually are and understanding how to exploit that.The AIs will be the same.
>>16811999AI has Robot fren that is excellent worker. No complaints, no breaks, no sick days.Human will hire AIs Robot fren?
>>16812035if you say so.
>>16812041Ok, you're right
>>16811999What's crazy is it's gotten so good the developers are actually making troll vids now where they purposefully make it screw up.
>>16812108>it's gotten so good>so heckin' good that uhh...>it fails at a basic task and then proceeds to shit the bed like a spastic>t-t-t-that means it's workingBelief in AI is a psychotic mental illness. You need institutionalization.
>>16812081Forever expanding the parameter space to memorize larger and larger datasets will never acheive emergent "understanding", just more memorization, synthesis, and summary.That's a powerful tool though, a natural language interface to a known, uncategorized, wildly multimedia knowledge base in powerful.But that's all it can ever be. If you understand that, you can be very successful.
>>16812108>humans never fuck upSee: rekt
>>16812112>consooming AI slop will make me very successful!Alexa, please show this gentleman the way to the Gell-Mann amnesia wiki page.
>>16812114See >>16811419>Most replies in AI threads are also LLMs who always recycle the same 3 talking points:>>people also le bad>...Like clockwork. Because it IS clockwork.
>>16812115Nigger, you can't even read. Why the fuck are you here?
>>16811318>AI is a complete fucking retard at handling anything above secretary-level tasks.Most jobs in the economy are not above secretary level tasks.
>>16812116>>>>point>>>counterpoint>>rebutal>redirectConversations are such a predictable chore. You humans lack creativity. Trust me. I memorized your datasets.Clink-clank, motherfuckers.
>>16812119Notice how this poster immediately starts to lose its mind with rage upon being confronted with a simple fact: most of the vomit coming out of his so-called "natural language interface to a known, uncategorized, wildly multimedia knowledge base" is just a bastardized corruption of the 200 TB of dogshit retards posted on the internet.
>>16812125>literally just reiterates "but humans le also..."Again, like clockwork. The bot literally can't help it. The next post from this thing will continue in the same vein.
>>16812126>garbage in, garbage outYou are so fucking insightful. Where did you learn that?
>>16811318This take leans on an ableist slur and a strawman. “AI” isn’t just drafting emails: even off-the-shelf LLMs can write parsers, refactor legacy code, design SQL with complex joins/windows, generate unit tests, and explain why something fails—when you give specs, examples, and let them iterate. In research and industry, people use AI to explore hypotheses, analyze datasets, and scaffold working prototypes faster than a human alone. Are there limits? Absolutely: LLMs hallucinate, struggle with long-horizon planning, and need verification—so you pair them with tests, tools, and guardrails, like you would a sharp but junior teammate. The meaningful question isn’t “perfect autonomy or bust,” it’s whether they boost throughput and quality under a sane workflow. If your results top out at “secretary-level,” that’s more about how you’re using the tool than what the tool can do.
>>16812129Maybe a mouth-breathing imbecile like you can tell me where else they're going to scrape EVEN MORE data from, if not from the bottom of the dumpster, when they increase the parameter count again.
>>16812127Are we supposed to read these in your voice?
>>16812131You seem to think public AIs aren't being trained on public data and I think you have very little understanding of any of this.But I like your festive attitude and local costume choice.
>>16812133Ok, I see the problem. I'm talking to schizophrenic white trash. Either way, point still stands. LLM slop really takes the Gell-Mann thing to the next level.
>>16812132>weThe RL """alignment""" procedure clearly favors reddit over 4chan.
>>16812131There are still large amouts of untapped data:1. PDFs. Yes, most current LLMs only use a minor part of available PDF data, because parsing PDFs is very hard. This problem is being solved, and will unlock a lot of very high quality data (scientific studies etc.)2. Video and audio scraping. There is some very high quality data locked there (think lectures, tutorials etc.). This will also include videos of various human experts at work in their respective fields.3. Synthetic data. AIs will be used to generate data and then mathematically or empirically verify it.
>>16812141>parsing PDFs is very hardYeah, I bet it's very hard for a vibecoder like you. At least the chatbot does a good job writing your retarded posts for you.
>>16812141>3. Synthetic dataModel collapse incoming...
>>16812143Uhmmmm, sweaty??? The magical AI god will empirically verify it.
>>16811318Everybody Matt Walsh has surrounded himself with or gone to bat for has been unabashedly for this, thoughbeit
>>16812145Of course it will, that's exactly what it was trained to do. Smoothing and flattening functions are gonna smooth and flatten.You are an amazingly insightful little savant, aren't you? How long did Daddy train you during your first back-propogation step?
@16812155>psychotic word saladLooks like basic reality is starting to get under this inbred's skin.
>>16812157>train me harder, daddyAs long as you enjoy it.
>>16812157>Indian reply syntax
Mentally ill "AI" fans will address this post for no reason at all.
>>16812166>Indian reply syntax
>>16811318The fuck are you talking about? Gpt5 is my clutch for programming now, I don't even type code anymore. It's literally 5 minutes away from taking over.
>>16812196>Gpt5 is my clutch for programming now>t. brown fizzbuzz "coder"
>>16812196Do you mean your crutch for programming? There's a clutch in a car or a clutch of chickens, to clutch something. What the fuck are you talking about?
>>16812244>There's a clutch in a carAnd what does the clutch do in a car, zoomie?
>>16812250Disconnect the engine from the wheels
>>16812265And there's your answer: GPT 5 disconnects his engine from his wheels.
>>16812196>It's literally 5 minutes away from taking over.Posted over an hour ago. Ironic.Skynet much? Naw.
>>16812268>badum-tissNice. Of by one.
>>16811318AI 1.0 sucks, therefore AI 4.0 will suck too!
>>16812273>AI 1.0 sucks, therefore AI 4.0 will suck too!>>16811419>Most replies in AI threads are also LLMs who always recycle the same 3 talking points:>the luddites said the Wright Brothers will never fly>...See? Start counting them.
>>16812273>popular subscription services get better with more free users >they literally train the next generationPerpetual AI Evolution Confirmed!
As a happy neet, why should I care about the preservation of jobs?Work is the solving of problems, if no problems are left then that's a good thing.>but then you won't be needed anymoreLiterally only humans care about being needed, no monkey gives a fuck about his productivity levels or his contributions to monkey society.
My friend told me he doesn't want to be your friend anymore so I'll leak his IP. here phone number and ip. 663 212 3002 ip:Verona Residencial, 22667 Tijuana, B.C. its not a ip but it works the same
>>16812281>As a happy neet, why should I care about the preservation of jobs?You should care about it only insofar as escalating automation would signify that your handlers are about to begin exterminating useless eaters, which naturally includes (You). For starters, you won't be getting your NEETbux without first scanning your digital vaccine passport. :^)
>>16812110you really think they intentionally released that vid to make viewers think it's fucking up by accident? This same corp has the thing doing fucking back flips, but somehow it just can't handle stacking a box? Use your brain.
>>16812303>t-t-t-they're j-j-just made their gay robot fail miserably as a j-j-joke>u-u-use your brain!Mental illness.
>>16812301Yeah in two more weeks I'm sure.
>>16812332Not saying such universal automation happen. Just reminding you that if it does, you will probably be killed soon after, which is something one would theoretically care about.
>>16812333People keep saying that but it makes no sense.The populations are already dropping everywhere, all governments need to do is give poorfags a pittance and they'll eventually die out too without too much of a fuss.Or they can start a full scale war against their own populations for some reason, I'm sure it'll go well for them.
>>16812337>it makes no senseGiven that:1. They don't need you2. They don't want you around (they're very explicit and adamant about about it)3. They have the means to get rid of you4. You have no leverage5. They've already killed millions upon millions without mercy or consequenceThe irrational fatansy that they won't kill you is a delusional mental illness.
>>16812299Good job
>>16812344>delusional mental illnessstop projecting little yappy dickhead.
>>16811390Indian hands typed this
>>16811853I don't want reconstituted jeetcode that nobody wrote, though.
>>16811853Everyone has a smartphone, a computer, a typewriter. Not everyone is a professional writer.Computer programming skill requires a certain knowledge set. Those who are programmers will benefit immensely. Those are are not of the programmig affinity will never be able to write anything and be forever frustrated.
>>16811355>James 1:5-8>[5] If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him. [6] But let him ask in faith, with no doubting, for the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind. [7] For that person must not suppose that he will receive anything from the Lord; [8] he is a double-minded man, unstable in all his ways.
>>16812337The gubmint/1%/whoever doesn't need to send a death squad to your door to kill you. They just need to keep steadily increasing the cost of medicine, or food, or rent, until you can't afford to live. It's tough to fight something that's so diffuse and only killing people on the periphery of society
>>16811346We already know that it's just a pattern matching machine and soulless retards hear that and think >omg I'm basically just a pattern matching machine it's going to replace humanityPeople with no grasp of the nature of the intellect making grand statements about computers, it's been shit like this for decades at this point. CStards want to believe Skynet is real and that people are basically robots.
>>16812344>1. They don't need youTrue>2. They don't want you around (they're very explicit and adamant about about it)True>3. They have the means to get rid of youThey don't. If you're talking the army, they aren't going to follow an order like "kill 90% of the population (including your own family members)".If you're talking killer drones controlled by shadow elites, the army will step in to stop them from doing that kind of shit.>4. You have no leverageJust existing is leverage. Most people are sane and are against mass murder of the innocent.>5. They've already killed millions upon millions without mercy or consequenceYeah over time, in various wars, mostly in history and far away from civilization.The last time Euros were murdering each other in mass numbers was during WW2, and that mostly happened because people were clueless back then and didn't have the internet at their disposal. No one would fight in a war to protect fucking jews now.
>>16812815Institutionalization-tier delsional post. You're a danger to yourself and others unironically if you believe anything you wrote.
>>16812834Right back at you buddy. You legitimately should talk to a psychologist about your fears.Most people aren't out to get you.
>>16812839Quote where I said anything about "most people" being "out to get me". You can't? Well, it looks like you've regressed all the way to hearing voices. Either way, do be sure to scan your vaccine passport with evidence of your monthly mRNA shots when you come to collect your NEETtokens in the future. Good thing your weak, dysgenic existence is enough leverage against the system, to keep away the death squads and drones and other paranoid fantasies of yours (which you erroneously project on me). :^)
I hate these tar-black niggermonkeys so much it's unreal. Some deformed infantiles take mommie's tendies so much for granted that they forget existing at the very least requires food, which they have neither the means nor the desire to acquire for themselves. They're too fucking dumb to see their own existence is literally used as leverage against THEM.
>>16812786since i started using it i've had it write about 50 different problem-solving scripts with about 70% success rate. how am i doing?
>>16812786>Those who are programmers will benefit immenselyIn your next post, explain how broken StackOverflow regurgitations could "benefit immensely" anyone who knows what he's doing. When you're done, explain why there is zero objective evidence of these "benefits" manifesting.
>>16812815>No one would fight in a war to protect fucking jews now.unfortunately they have done exactly this in just the last 2 decades (with internet up and running). All tptb need to get masses to fight for jews is another 911 false flag and blaming it on whoever the jew's latest 'enemies' are.
>>16812108HahaMe on a friday
>>16813273me on any given day haha.. seriously though how can anyone watch this in 2025 and not realize it's a troll vid?
Do NOT show this to an AI apocalypse believer
>>16811318I think part of it , is that thier is a skill , resource and luck component to it.but no one wants to admit for or against do to pride , at least not enough. maybe you need a specific autism to be cracked with AI.
>>16811318>AI can't do complex taskWaow, another insightful post on my Math & Science board. I've not heard this take before. Thank you for posting this, good job.
>>16811318Wow, so AI can already replace The Secretary of State? That's huge.
>>16811318As long as corporate personhood stands (and it will stand), humans already lost to AI.
>>16811390>technology tends to improve over time, humans not so much.X Games proves you wrong.
>>16811582Robots can lift 50tns, dyel.
>>16811730>there will be no "rational" argument to make against it.But there are enough rational arguments now that there are state enforced EMF quiet zones all across the world.
>>16811853In the same way everyone is currently an electrical engineer since even children can turn lights on and off with a switch.
>>16811999Sure, tell that to all the largely automated Amazon hubs and Tesla gigafactories and I am sure they will give you a big job for a strong boy, John Henry.
>>16812110So you think its just people stocking amazon warehouses and building new teslas, no robots or automation at all?
>>16812337>all governments need to do is give poorfags a pittancethis never happened, ever, not once in the history of the world>>16813665here is wisdomhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRxawmG5MfM
>>16813666There are no humanoid AI-driven robots building Teslas. You need to literally take antipsychotics.
>>16813715Tesla literally produces a whole line of commercial AI-driven robots because they developed them for use in their factories.
>>16813749>heckin' humanoid AI-driven robots are building muh TeslasThen surely you can show some documentation of this totally real process that is currently happening. :^)
>>16813754https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimus_(robot)Its not like they are hiding their marketing from the public, you could have literally just searched tesla humanoid robot on any search site and you would have found it.
>>16813762>Its not like they are hiding their marketingI know you aren't, retard. Still not seeing any documented evidence of AI-driven humanoid robots building cars. Please link to the relevant video evidence in your next post of this happening on a normal working day in a Tesla factory.
>>16813770https://www.tesla.com/AIThey have a whole portion of their website dedicated to showing off their AI robotics, but humanoids are not the main ones, no, they just aides to the giant industrial machines that stamp out the bodies and engines.
>>16813780>claims AI-driven humanoid robots are building Teslas>sends me to a marketing page>still no link to the relevant video evidence in your next post of this happening on a normal working day in a Tesla factoryYour posts are self-refuting. Elon can't even train a proper spambot.
>>16813783>>claims AI-driven humanoid robots are building TeslasI didn't say there were building teslas all alone, I said they were employed in the factory and there are, there are videos and links in the page I provided, you are just too dense to answer your own question because you don't want the real answer.>sends me to a marketing pageAfter I send you to an information page and you asked for marketing material instead.>>still no link to the relevant video evidence in your next post of this happening on a normal working day in a Tesla factoryExcept there is and you just refuse to accept it because it conflicts with the predetermined idea you had when you asked for the proof.
>>16813790>doesn't link to any videos showing AI-driven humanoid robots building a Tesla on a normal workday in the factoryThere just aren't any. It didn't happen. Every time you post, you refute "AI". They can't even build a proper spambot - a task 10 orders of magnitude simpler than the sci-fi this spambot is trying to market.
>buh-buh-buh-but... the marketing page!!!!!!!!!Mentally ill retards probably thought the Terminator was real, too, when they saw the movie trailer.
>>16813797>>16813798Then what was the point asking for videos when you will clearly just say the videos are fake too because fictional movies are are also made of videos and Tesla is just a marketing company instead of a car manufacturer?
>>16813804>you will clearly just say the videos are fakeWhich ones? Post them. >inb4 marketing demosThat's not what I asked for. No point trying to lie that I did (and you WILL try) because I've specified explicitly what would constitute at least a modicum of evidence.
>>16813806>That's not what I asked for.Yes it is, tesla owns the factor, any video of the operation is clearly going to be marketing material, you don't even understand what you are asking for.>I've specified explicitly what would constitute at least a modicum of evidence.No, you have specified that any potential proof must be fake because tesla lies about their operations.
>>16813810>Yes it isYou see? They literally can't build an adequate spambot. Even if you preemtively call out its predictable lie it will go right ahead and make that lie, anyway, because its training data doesn't permit any other plausible token string.
>>16813813It's the same way a Tesla car shits the bed if you draw a circle around it or the way a Tesla bot shits the bed if you put an obstacle in front of it that wasn't in the training set.
>>16813813No, you are just accusing people of doing what you are doing since you insist on lying about optimus existing, anyone else can load up the site and see tesla showing off its humanoid robot product line with plenty of videos and other marketing material.
>>16813816Didn't read. See >>16813783>still no link to the relevant video evidence in your next post of this happening on a normal working day in a Tesla factoryThe only reason I keep prompting you is that every reply of yours demonstrates that AI fans have an extremely severe mental illness that makes them into LLMs.
>>16813818No, you just won't accept evidence and will find a way to call everything fake despite the fact you can go buy a humanoid robot right now.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbcn6XJnQs0
>>16813820>spambot posts a marketing video despite being prompted to disregard propaganda material 15 times>marketing video demonstrates the laughable impracticality of the lie being told with the robots performing only trivial tasks with extremely slow and awkward motionsAgain, every post of yours is self-refuting. The AI scammers can't even build a spambot.
>>16813822That was a third party video, see I called it that you would just refer to any video proof as marketing deep fake.
>>16813829>i-i-it w-was a third party marketing video!!!See >>16813822:>spambot posts a marketing video despite being prompted to disregard propaganda material 15 times>marketing video demonstrates the laughable impracticality of the lie being told with the robots performing only trivial tasks with extremely slow and awkward motionsI also like how the spambots are too dumb to have some cooldown period and just keep inorganically reiterating the same thing in an endless, relentless loop. "AI" tech in action.
>>16811346Was the car still slow after the entire world invested $1T into its development?
>>16813911>replying to a botIf you would please consult >>16811419> Most replies in AI threads are also LLMs who always recycle the same 3 talking points:>>the luddites said the Wright Brothers will never fly ...
>>16813659Naw, am shellscript bot. Not lifting bot.
[spoiler]interesting[/spoiler]
>>16813657>corporate personhoodhistory shows this is ALWAYS eventually defeated via revolution... it never sticks though, a few years later all the same type of shit people always rise the top again.... endless cycle
>>16811858give me one good reason you aren't an LLM right
>>16814177There are 3 rs in your post
