>Infinity cannot exist in reality.>But also the reason that the universe seems teleological is because it's merely one universe contained within an infinite multi-verse where all possible worlds are exhausted!
>yes, I love quoting imaginary people in my head!
>>16813642Struck a nerve, did I?
>>16813642this reddit tranny? seethin
>>16813685>this reddit tranny? seethinFuck off to pol, christcuck
>yet another schizophasia thread
Maybe there's another universe with 4 spatial dimensions instead of 3.
universe by definition encompasses all and therefore more cannot exist
>>16814266My thought as well, but it doesn't matter since they equivocate on universe.
>>16814267I don't care, anyone who cannot comprehend a basic definition is a low IQ mouthbreather whose words mean nothing, everything he says should be completely discredited, even if it is the truth, retards deserve nothing, let someone intelligent formulate something legible.
>universe by definition encompasses all and therefore more cannot exist
>>16813642>instantly starts crying
>>16814288>yes, I love imagining people crying!
>>16814285Yeah. He thought arguing semantics will make him seem smart
>>16814392ack-chually, i by definition encompass all the smartness possible for my definition of myself, therefore a 'me' smarter than me cannot exist
>>16814266If the universe encompasses all then other universes which are outside of it clearly wouldnt play by the same rules since the universe encompasses the rules
>it's another episode of people writing posts in a language with no proper typechecking and confusing all their meta-levels/sci/ posts should be written in Idris.
>>16813642op zutted
>>16813369Shut the fuck up muzzieAnswer this without sounding retarded: where is your god without special pleading
>>16814414if universe encompasses all then it encompasses all you retarded tranny, you will never be a woman, lay off estrogen injection for a day before responding to me again
>>16815692No, if it only encompasses everything, then it can't possibly encompass everything else since those things are mutually exclusive.
>>16813369>But also the reason that the universe seems teleological is because it's merely one universe contained within an infinite multi-verse where all possible worlds are exhausted!Huh?
>>16813642>that imaginary person's name?>Albert Einstein!whoa..the Einstein effect in action (E.E.I.A.) in action
>>16813369This is my favorite wojak. Personally.
>>16818913The posit a multiverse to "negate" the appearance of design in nature. It's mental gymnastics.
>>16818994Who is? And can you post an examole of someone doing that?
>>16818994Multiverse is mostly a popsci concern. Most physicists are aware of the concept but it's of limited interest. So who cares? They say a lot of stupid bullshit in the media about everything.
>>16818994>>16813369>the appearance of design in natureLook, it's another religious retard complaining about popsci episode!
>>16813369>all possible worlds are exhausted!No, if they really could be exhausted, there would be an actual numerical infinity instead of the limit we use now, but they can't be exhausted because infinity can't actually be realized, it will just keep expanding to accommodate any and all arbitrarily large verses.
>>16818996Here is just one example of someone "intergalactically obliterating" the teleological argument with the multiverse posit where he states it's the most common objection to the design argument. Which is true and what I am saying. The "best" argument against design is to posit a multiverse LMAOhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzuOw6IdLbQ