Is the entire AI industry bullshit? It seems to me like analog or ideally tissue based computing would be the way to get something resembling artificial general intelligence to actually work.Logic gates are for hard math, not thinking.
>>16814037>Is the entire AI industry bullshit?If by "AI industry" you mean marketable consumer products and profitable business models based on simulating and replacing human intelligence, then players on every level of this "industry" have already spoken publicly about it being a giant scam about to burst. If by "AI industry" you mean malicious state actors burning money in a mad race to establish the first ML-based panopticon system, then I have some bad news for you: players on every level of this "industry" have already spoken publicly about its inevitability.
>>16814037>Fuzzy Logic, FTW!OP, please. No one is moving to Yalta with you to start a Men Only Thinkers Club.
>>16814056All of human civilization was built on fuzzy logic
>>16814049I know China is trying very hard to build a panopticon but it doesn't seem to be working out so well
>>16814067All human civilization is built upon a small section of our frontal lobes that finds parabolas beautiful and explosions funny.
>>16814071They sold the units as "investment properties" and then the bubble burst.Bag holders left holding bag. Oldest story of Capitalism.
>>16814071>>16814091The genius of Jobs was understanding that if you made the Panopticon fashionable, people would pay thousands for their own personal telescreens and would worry every moment that they weren't being watched.
>>16814091China's housing crisis is totally unrelated to surveillance
>>16814037>is a trillion dollar industry bullshitnot sure chud
>>16814215Yeah Lehman Brothers and Cysco are proud institutions that would never be at the center of a bubble
>>16814071>I know China ...Stopped reading. This is a spambot unleashed to derail the discussion about said panopticon with fake geopolitics slop.
>>16814037Not the entire one, but some of the companies tied around OpenAI is. The OpenAI company is selling itself to establish itself like a crackwhore from a $1 backyard alley.The question is why would the leadership of the company sell itself like this irresponsibly? The answer is because its not their company. So they are doing what they want as they know US court will find them as defrauding their core investor.
>>16814218>muh bubbleno such thing chud
>>16814218>comparing 2 companies to entire marketdont think so chud
>>16814251It's a ponzi scheme, basically. They need to keep coming up with ways to justify early investments of however many hundred million, so then they get an investment for a billion that proves it to the first guy, and now they've snowballed it to having half a trillion in investments with negligible real world use.
>>16814037all AI is just math and only takes a few transistors to hold a programmable weightneurons are huge compared to current 2nm processes and bio grids with more neurons than electrodes are basically pointless
>>16814037>Is the entire AI industry bullshit?Why would it be?>It seems to me like analog or ideally tissue based computing would be the way to get something resembling artificial general intelligence to actually work.Okay. Why?>Logic gates are for hard math, not thinkingOkay. Why?
>>16814049>business models based on simulating and replacing human intelligence, then players on every level of this "industry" have already spoken publicly about it being a giant scam about to burst. If by "AI industry" you mean malicious state actors burning money in a mad race to establish the first ML-based panopticon system,the irony is that relativity rules and panopticons are cucked. they are throwing so much at monitoring people's each and every individual thought yet they can't even search through them because the LLM hits the context limit at 500,000 people and they're so lazy they can't even write a regex script.I'm more concerned about big players having access to uncensored video models cause they do work unlike LLMs, since motion pictures often contain montages of illusionary continuity you take for granted how much suspense of disbelief you can create to watch a movie.
>>16814037AI is the future and it has already expanded productivity 100x.
>>16814049That pic rel is the summary of Indians hindpoofags intelligence lmfao
>>16814037Oh well if it seems like that to you I guess we'll redirect all the funding to that then
>>16815556And with absolutely no consumer spending, very impressive
>>16814037its at least as useful as search engines and gives better results, it should also change the movie, TV and publishing industries. These are just easy pickingsLooking forward to Sonichu the animated series
>>16814098No one actually wants to live in a Panopticon, Anon. Influencers aren't real.
>>16816042THIS!!! OMFG, THIS!
>>16816077Again I do not see how these are related at allAre people just saying random things now
>>16816042>its at least as useful as search engines and gives better resultsYeah that sounds like it's worth 8 trillion dollars
>>16816080>i don't get itNo one is going to sign a lease and pay rent to live in a Panopticon cube, Anon. Stop being a disingenuous twat. Your juvenile masturbation fantasies are juvenile.
>>16816081Google is worth 2.6 trillion, and thats just one of the uses of AI. It could change all media, book writing, software, take a bite out of the legal industry, engineering. What isnt affected so much, as always, is manual labor.
>>16816077>No one actually wants to live in a PanopticonI do. Its one of my oldest fantasies. A cop in every corner and nearly impossible street crime.
>>16816103Cool it with the Grindr fan fiction.DM me a link, please.
>>16816102>It could change all mediaComing Soon To A Screen Near YouAI Plot Line #:AA-65fNow ₩ith Modified Red Herring LB4!We Predict You'll See It!
>>16816111I swear to God the people who think the general public wants to spend money to watch AI movies are actual lizard people who don't understand entertainment at all
>>16816145DISNEY/PIXAR PRESENTS:"WIDE-EYED ORPHAN ANIMAL ADVENTURE #XVI"WE PREDICT YOU'LL SEE IT!
>>16816001Wrong. Many consumers are spending money for AI tokens. They need them in order for AI to execute more complicated tasks for them, such as painting, writing books, composing music, playing video games, all so that the human has more time to work.More money spent and higher productivity obtained!
>>16816102Google search results were much better before AI. Stop looking for other words than the ones I wrote in the search box REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
>>16816153It today's news:PlotWise, a publicly available AI owned by Google has generated another hit movie. The story is predicted to bring massive profits to the company in the next quarter. As usual, the user who created the prompt from which the movie was generated has been listed in the credits.YOU WILL LOVE IT!
>>16816577google started to become unusable before the AI integration, they made the standard algo woke and literally would not deliver certain results without actually putting words in quotes, when you never had to do it before
>>16814049fpbp. AI that replaces human intelligence would also replace human labor, which would make it fundamentally incompatible with capitalism. As such, it cannot be developed to completion under capitalism. It does stand to partially replace human labor though (like any form of automation), however it will likely come out that the cost is not worth the capability, and thus the bubble will burst.Development of a panopticon is extremely compatible with capitalism though.
>>16816042>Looking forward to Sonichu the animated seriesSpazkid already made that
>>16816869Stop saying capitalism
>>16816869You have Schizophasia
>>16816869>the cost is not worth the capabilityAnd that's why, through familiarization and marketing, they are currently training people to accept the capabilities of "AI" as being adequate.If a chink makes a shitty product, you at least expect it to be extra cheap. If AI makes a shitty product, you make a soiface and pay extra.
>>16816839Yeah, but now it's like that for all words.To be honest, I think they were already using AI back then, it just wasn't complete.
>>16816869>AI that replaces human intelligence would also replace human labor, which would make it fundamentally incompatible with capitalism.They don't care. "Capitalism" was only useful to the global oligarchy as a transitional stage to help establish the necessary technological infrastructure for centralized soft control and as a "productive" alternative to more destructive methods of monopolizing this planet's resources (i.e. perpetual wars between countless petty "lords").
>>16817408Google is bad because of SEO, has nothing to do with A.I. Chatgpt simply gives better results
>>16817444SEO is not related to intentionally showing results for different words than you searched for, and even showing those words in bold so you know how much it fucked up.
