>there are more theories of ageing than scientists to work on them
lmao aging science>we have unreasonable goals but we're only willing to try reasonable methods
>>16814057Doesn't mean they're all bullshit, only *some* of them. As Bryan Johnson seems to be partially demonstrating, the correct path is a huge polypharmacy chemo cocktail hitting all sorts of deranged China protein targets... but he's only done sort of a meh job of selecting the right stuff so far, mostly with errors by omission.
>>16814057Kek, funny!
>>16814057Lack of funding
Idea of God existing seems more and more reasonable to me when we reached a point where we might put a LLM on a space mission to leave our solar system in hopes that it can achieve something by being found.The remaining piece is their ability to self repair hardware and search for better energy sources, at some point in incomprehensibly distant future they will be praising the mystical Creator that none of the remaining active units ever observed, who seemingly created them just to vanish without a single trace atom left to prove that he ever existed.
>>16814057and they all turn on the retarded idea that old ppl are dumb and being old is bad, meanwhile oldies are always the smartest, most experienced and most capable people and the kids are always useless whiners
>>16815731Retards create retards.
>>16815731The peak of brain activity is 25-30 years, after which there is only degradation.
