Does one times one actually equal two?
>>16820141
No, imagine listening to a nigger.
>>16820141T
>>16820145But he has lots of money
>>16820141Only if you use willpower and lube to make it so
>>16820148He's still a nigger.>2 x 2 = 4>2 x (1 + 1) = 4>2x1 + 2x1 = 3 + 3>6 = 4I cannot imagine being this buck broken over basic, elementary, first grade maths. Holy hell.
>>16820155I think this may be a strawman
>>16820156>2x2 = 4>(1 + 1) x (1 + 1)>1x1 + 1x1 + 1x1 + 1x1>2 + 2 + 2 + 2 = 8>4 = 8This is your civilization on black mathematics.
>>16820158strawman
>>16820158If you want to educate and unbranwasher yourself here's his book it's free delve into 162 pages of this genius then here’s a link to his book https://tcotlc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/OTOET_PREVIEW_062_October_03_2021.pdf
>>16820161Unfortunately, negro mathematics is far beyond me. I simply have to accept that the axioms of nigger math will always imply gibbs me dat.
>>16820165If I'm white and receiving gibs what am I classified as?
>>16820206Wigger.
>>16820268I get the best of both worlds?
>>16820271Worst of all worlds I'm afraid.
>>16820278It's better if I'm black and on welfare? Why?
>>168201411x1=4 because 1x1 = 1^2 and a square has 4 sides.
wild burger sighted!
>>16820389more burger
He thinks a * b means a added to itself b timesHe thinks a ^ b means a multiplied with itself b times
>>16820398>He thinks a * b means a added to itself b timesSo what's the top /sci/ counter-argument to this mathematical proposal?
Has he ever filled out more of the new multiplication table than >>16820148 ? I skimmed over his book and he talks about how the identity property is a "Jim Crow law", how he was spanked by his teacher about asking what [math]\sqrt{2}[/math] is, various properties of the standard answer to [math]\sqrt{2}[/math] which make him think something is wrong, Wildberger, Rodin's coil, the gold standard, and sacred geometry, but I don't see a lot of work toward building the new corrected mathematics.
>>16820398Has he actually claimed 2*2 = 6 anywhere? Has anyone asked him what he thinks 2*2 is?
One of the things that terrify me about the human condition is that I could be a Terrence D. Howard in some situation and never know it. Having very little idea what I'm talking about has never precluded me from obsessively arguing. ;^(
>>16820410maybe he's joking
>>16820141kekistanis will defend this btw
>>16820412That's too many words for a joke.
>>16820398But he also seems to say 2*2 = 4 here. Granted him arguing that 2*2 = 4 implies 1*1 = 2 doesn't mean he believes 2*2 = 4, but it seems odd for him to feature this so prominently in the book without correcting it if he doesn't believe it. It seems more likely that he doesn't really have a coherent, self-consistent concept of multiplication. But maybe he says 2*2 = 6 somewhere and I just missed it.
>>16820145MF forgot that Isaac Newton was a African American that got white-washed in the history books.>>16820295It's wprse because white people are supposed to work.
>>16820428Why should whites work? Especially in 2025?
>>16820141>>16820142>>16820146>>16820148I'm not reading or considering this until he formats it in LaTeX.
>>16820141just redefine multiplication so they equal
>>16820141Does anybody know who Terrence Howard is, or is he just black famous?
