>is there any thing out there about making pocket world dimensions a reality.?I know lucid dream is one wayBut can it be a kinda of world that have real effect not just. A dream? Say if you eat in that world u will be actually had real food not just some dream?You just have to shrink a volume of space containing a world down to the desired size (along with the space it occupies) and create a traversible conduit to it linking the two (pocket world and real-world) spatial dimensions while canceling out the electrogravitic potentials between the two. This can be done with magnets utilizing the correct geometry and strength.Study aether theory, classical electrodynamics, and electrogravitics until you've unified them with relativity, quantum mechanics, and quantum electrodynamics. Sorry I can't be more specific, but there's no info unifying them publicly available (the one point worth noting: they are ALL right within their relevant context, they are subsets of a greater theory so ignore basically everything stating that any one/two of them is/are the solution to everything.) Actual physics has no bounds, the theory only grows because physics is infinite and the most you can do is reconcile sub-theories and expand the scope of the context you're defining. The big pieces you need to pay attention to in order to unify them are the origin of inertia, the nature of perception, and the reasons why we believe time exists.>You can read Langan he unifies it in the informational universe theory.No he doesn't. He lays out a way in which consciousness expounds from first principles, there is no "theory of everything" because physics is infinite, it cannot be defined in full, only contextually.>But it is information, shit we can measure learn or perceive, regardless if we have seen it yet or not.It's not. There's more to the universe than what our perceptions constrain us to. "It's information" is (ironically) the materialist view.
>>16822166>If it's not information what it is?What's the basic approach to what existsNothing exists.At the most fundamental level we are oscillations of the void between nothingness and "nothingness."In that regard Langan was right, as he described the "physics" at that layer of consciousness emergence, of the root consciousness.We are several layers of emergent within that, before we even get to the base Boltzmann multiverse substrate on which on consciousnesses emerge.We don't get to the root consciousness level, even though we are already there it is so far removed that there is no linking which can be made in a sufficient manner, but our current layer of emergence is more versatile imo.On this layer the flow of energy is the "base" layer upon which we can weave any form of physics we desire with sufficient tech, and without succumbing to hellscapes of possibility in the form of just-because-it-can-exist-it-does in the process.Our consciousness has built-in filters which can be used to break navigation to worldlines we don't want to experience, and to escape them if we accidentally find ourselves in one.All things exist, it's the connections between moments we have control over.So essentially it's matter+energy (as we currently classify it) and not information alone.The fact our brains change physical conformation with each and every thought allows us to naturally filter what we can perceive, in a way intimately coupled to reality.
>>16822169Informational models would suggest a mind-upload is just as good, akin to http://frombob.to/you/aconvers.html - but that's not the case at all, because the perceptual rindler horizons are significantly smaller than what we already have (and it would break our connection to our other selves spanning the multiverse - or our "soul" for lack of a better term - especially when virtualized on another layer of hardware alongside others, effectively cannibalizing your consciousness to create a singular entity.)The "soul" is the aggregate of "you's" across the multiverse.
>>16822166Also >Is there any thing out rhere about making pocket world dimensions a reality.?I know lucid dream is one wayBut can it be a kinda of world that have real effect not just. A dream? Say if you eat in that world u will be actually had real food not just some dream?You just have to shrink a volume of space containing a world down to the desired size (along with the space it occupies) and create a traversible conduit to it linking the two (pocket world and real-world) spatial dimensions while canceling out the electrogravitic potentials between the two. This can be done with magnets utilizing the correct geometry and strength.>This shit doesn't even make sense. Where did you get this?Years of studying quantum mechanics, relativity, quantum electrodynamics, classical electrodynamics, aether theory, and the occult - to the point of unifying them into a single theory.>OkHave you had any success with this practice?Plus shrinking a part of space needs tools obviouslyWhat tools do you used before?Magnets>But how?Any thing you did before? Any experiment? Any success story?Yes, it's relatively simple to warp space with magnets and observe the effect if you know what you should actually be looking for. The trick will be scaling up to the size of a planet or a "zone"-style flat-Earth with a technological apparatus for gravity generation along a plane. The prerequisite effects are there though, and attainable with sufficient technology.
My simplified toe:Photons are the basic substrate of reality>boltzman brainYeah the entire universe is probably a boltzmann brain, it even looks like a brain...
>>16822352Isn't that scary though?
>>16822377Not reallyFear is not the answerLove > fearWe dont actually die. Body yes, conciousness, no.
>>16822380Brain is quantum mechanical organ (penrose)It contains what the ancients call the soulBody death just frees you from flesh limitsThis is why the NDErs go into the light and all the religions speak of light beings and god being lightNo body, u become a pure conciousness
>>16822384Studied NDEsThe vast majority are similarGo through tunnel, meet ancestors/cultural dieties/light beings, in a pure bliss realm w different subjective time perception and ability to see all color spectrums. Thats the realm of light when you are no longer limited by having a body.The negative ndes are uncommon and always temporary.
>>16822387>>16822384What about Jesus and him rising from the dead
>>16822406>>16822406A lot of people have nearly died and come back. I have trouble understanding scripture...it has too many laws that I cannot follow. I prefer the simplicity of the golden rule. The scriptures are... inconsistent...and have led to...centuries of debate and division. An unfortunate flaw due to the imperfection of language and metaphor to describe reality. I do not mean to offend anyone, religion can provoke strong ingroup/outgroup feelings. Theres so many bibles, and so many church doctrines, impossible to please everyone...I do not like that people fight so much over...correct ritual practice and ritual days...Ive had difficulties w religious trauma, I personally prefer not reading it anymore.
>>16822421For instance, I recently had to yell at myself that no, I will not cut off my penis, eyeball, or hand just bc scripture says so.U would not actually want to practice scripture perfectly. It would drive you insane. Nor can I feel guilty about following laws that no one else really does either.
>>16822424Attempting to be too much like christ drove me into all sorts of delusions, I eventually had to accept scripture was flawed and its healthier for me personally to not read it. I have terrible religious trauma. I do not consider myself to be a horrible sinner for my inability to follow impossible laws and general distrust of religious authority. Apologies if that offends anyone.
>>16822430that's okay, just do your best that's all God can hope for
>>16822421>>16822424>>16822430You sound like a mentally-ill retard.Kill yourself, faggot.
>>16822166Your image reminds me of the photoelectric effect.
>>>/x/ is that way buddy
Bump
What do you think about this theory I found online? It seems like it can help explain many paranormal phenomenon like law of attraction/prayer>Reality isn't real and consciousness is all that exists.Physics/reality are an interface for consciousnesses to communicate with one another.You can see this testing conspiracy theory tech in private: it will work a bunch of the time, pretty much any time you believe it.If you get overly excited and show it to a physics PhD it will fall apart.If you show it non-physics-educated people, then stoner nerds, then nerds obsessed with physics but not formally educated, then those formally educated in physics but not working professionally in it, THEN a physics PhD, the effect will hold, but typically the physics PhD will obsess over it for a month or three then move on to something else because they never actually had a mind for physics to begin with (that's more or less what academia selects for these days.)Controlling reality in private is easy, pushing those effects to a wider audience is harder because reality is an interface to communicate, not a real thing. All parties involved need to be able to not necessarily make sense of or comprehend it, but for it to mesh with their own worldview/reality.A good example is relativity vs quantum mechanics - both are "real," both work, both have predictive capacity, and both are completely irreconcilable with one another - essentially two distinct rulesets for reality which were widely held by everyone who cared to look and accepted as truth by everyone else until they became real.Electrodynamics and aether theory imo pose the greatest potential currently to merge+expand on "physics," just keep in mind it's all a bunch of bs and try not to paint yourself (and everyone else) into a corner like they did with QM and GR by failing to understand that
>>16822433Thank you>>16822625I have struggled. Please be kind. If more people are kind to each other, there will be less sickness in the world. I was once very unkind. It was sickness in me. More kindness between people = less sickness, less suffering, less pain.
>>16823053Yes this includes being kind to animals If I was a Christian I would not believe in scriptural inerrancy and I would be a universalist https://www.dominionmovement.com/watchhttps://benthams.substack.com/p/universalism-a-comprehensive-defense?utm_source=publication-search
Test
>>16823065stop saying nigger and posting porn
>>16823035Positive thinking is good for the body and good social relations.I do not believe in arbitrary schizotheories, magick, or quacktech. Theres placebo effects but they cannot shatter reality. Have read claims of levitation and psi, but are always disproven as hoaxes. Also much of what people call "astral projection" can be dismissed as lucid dream states.>bro uh bro i saw uh reptilians inside the hollow earth/swiss cheese moon
>>16823064I personally choose not to be vegan, simply to not feel horrible. I am against the meaningless abuse and sacrifice of mammals. When try to expand compassion to all animals...causes me too much grief. I see animals die every day, cannot be miserable about that.Potentially, in the future, can have animal based products without killing animals, look into precision fermentation. Until then, I will not beat myself up for eating meat.Yes...I align towards universal salvation. Possible isolated instances of reincarnation. My disagreements w Langan:>photons are the computation substrate, not abstract information>no such thing as separation from god, the idea of separation from an omnipresent transcendent entity is incoherent>no afterlife punishment, afterlife is so vast theres room for all souls to enter bliss realms>vast majority nders have a life review without judgement, only occasional ndes experience temporary negative events
>>16823106>I personally choose not to respect human rights, simply to not feel horrible. I am against the meaningless abuse and sacrifice of humans. >When try to expand compassion to all humans...causes me too much grief. I see humans die every day, thousands die in Ukraine everyday and I only kill one or two humans a day it's a drop in the ocean, cannot be miserable about that.>Potentially, in the future, can have human organs grown in a lab no need to murder humans and steal their organs. Until then, I will not beat myself up for killing humans.Individual boycott matters. If you buy eggs you pay for thisIndividual boycott means the difference between life and death for between 1-900 chickensLots of evidence of thisI know individual consumer boycott does make a difference in sparing chickens lives Like in the first five minutes of this video https://youtu.be/brKhhZlUoOc?feature=sharedhe discuses a study that shows the average consumer has a 90 something percent chance of causing 1 - 900 extra chickens to be bred into existence tortured and killed.https://philarchive.org/rec/MCMAIO
>veganism>aether (i really have allergic reaction to the word aether)>consciousnesswhat the fuck happened to /sci/? you retards are not the next einstein. aether theories are pseudoscience as much as astrology. it doesn't exist. consciousness is illusion, free will is a religion.
>>16823125I have no choice but to shitpost then not my fault
>>16823117If you wish to be vegan, that is your perogative. I am not able to feel awful about eating food. Occasionally I have had that level of compassion, but, to be *that* compassionate makes me suffer. Id cry every time I see a wild animal die...cannot go that far. I do hope eventually precision fermentation products will gradually replace factory farming. Uses less water and energy. People are averse to GMOs but its the same technique used to create insulin and cheese.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_fermentation
>>16823153I had a problem once, where expanding my empathy to all life, caused me too much pain. My human reserve of compassion is not infinite, otherwise, I feel suffering over things not under my control. Cant force entire planet to not eat meat overnight. We do what we can to reduce suffering, one day at a time. Animals die in the wild, we couldnt force them to be vegan as well.
>>16823157Animals at least have a gift we dont have, they dont worry about global scale problems outside of their own control. Cant personally change the world overnight. They also dont worry about the afterlife.
>>16823157>>16823161>>16823153This just sounds like an appeal to futility
>>16823117>disturbing imagenothing disturbing about it
>>16823163There are things I cannot personally change.>animals and people experience physical death>veganism has led my close relatives to have health problems>i enjoy eating animal products and dont want excessive compassion to the point of despairIf I had the power, there would be no sickness, no physical death, no war, no poverty. Overnight. But I dont have such power. I accept imperfection.
>>16823173Well you can choose to boycott meat dairy and eggs just as you can choose to boycott hitmen and child pornography.>>16823117
>>16823125are you going to cry, tranny?
>>16823165Slit your throat and kys psychopathic faggot. Damn you and your judeo-masonic civilization to hell.
>>16823071I think you are just a bugman.