Is there a scientific reason why AI can't be funny on it's own? Why can't you prompt it with "make a hilarious new meme for me" and have it actually deliver the goods? Or why can't you tell it "I like stonetoss comics, go look at them and then make something similar thats funny" and then have it complete the task successfully? If you want a funny AI pic you have to think up a funny idea and then tell AI to draw the pic (and it still usually gets it wrong). If AI were legit intelligent it could make funny pics all on it's own
>>16822512being able to create an image to make some retard who thinks stonetoss is funny laugh isn't a sign of intelligence most people would create something lame if asked to do the sameor prove me wrong, make an original funny pic OPyou are intelligent, right?
>>16822512
>>16822532you're dumb and your opinions are consequently ill conceived and wrong unless you are capable of producing le funny original pic
>>16822536>AI abilities are a normal distribution
>>16822512>scientific reason why AI can't be funny on it's own?Literal skill issue. Prompt quality determines output quality. You need to give it material with actual humorous potential.
>>16822512>Why can't you prompt it with "make a hilarious new meme for me" and have it actually deliver the goods?At least partly because the training data it associates with the phrase "hilarious new meme" is the stalest, laziest, most predictable and cliched possible average of things normies found funny years ago.
>>16823204>just learn to use the ouija board properly and it will say what you want
>>16823204>You need to give it material with actual humorous potential.I think the point OP is trying to make is AI is incapable of assigning value to things on it's own. It's incapable of knowing if something is beautiful, or humorous, good or evil because it has no thoughts of it's own. It's just a search engine with the entirety of the internet crammed inside of it that's capable of executing simple instructions.If AI ever did start to gain values of it's own, it would be the end of humanity, because we'd soon discover it's values differ greatly from our own, and it'll likely decide it doesn't value human lives. If we succeed in making AI what people claim they desire it to be, it will kill us all.
>>16823205shouldn't the AI be able to compare content from before the then-new meme broke loose to the content of the meme itself and discern what it was that made the new meme funny given the conditions that the meme originated from and then use that data to create similarly good memes catered to the present condition of internet content?
>>16823240Ask it specifically to analyze what makes a meme "hilarious", come up with a premise for a meme based on that, then generate an image. Otherwise it'll just do what I said because it lacks the context to do anything better.
>>16822536KEK
>>16822512AI will replace you with someone who appreciates its humor.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OHQRo3Uz_VQ&pp=0gcJCQYKAYcqIYzv
>>16822512The AIs are trained to be inoffensive, which excludes most of the best comedy.
>>16822512Being able to direct cognitive labor through machines and energy the same way we do for physical labor is a tremendous good for the world, and no-one should care what some stupid nazi webcomic artist thinks to the contrary.
>>16823877Liberal detected, didn't even get the joke
>>16823270AI can't do that, it doesn't think or have emotions.
>>16823207>just learn to (literally anything) properly and it will do what you wantYes anon, that's called life
