How do Chinese people reverse engineer everything from Western science?>t. royal who wants to do it too to industrialize my 3rd world countryOr should I seek another way?
>>16823765>How do Chinese people reverse engineer everything from Western science?Its called studying, you dont have to reinvent science that already exist.>Seek another wayMake an alliance with the chinese or some other power and request they give you a bodyguard corps and electronic surveillance experts or you wont stay royal for long.
They read.
>>16823765Stalin just bought a lot of machine tools and paid for them by exporting grain, he also bought whole factories designed in the US. This made germany increasingly uneasy as industry was kind of their thing.
>>16823765They don't reverse engineer everything, they steal most everything because they don't have the concept of intellectual property, or individualism being as they are a communist hive collective. They should try to reverse engineer Christian morals and culture instead, before attempting the technology.
>>16823765They used to buy it from russians who got it from the israelis who stole the blueprints from the us and other white countries
>>16823830>israelisStop noticing.
>>16823828You don't steal tech simply by getting blueprints, my good retard.
>>16823765Larp. Do eugenics, 3rd world population IQ will never produce 1st world results.
>>16824794>, 3rd world population IQ will never produce 1st world results.exactly why is that. The vast majority of people just do labor, you can find high iQ technocrats in most third world places. Im imagining places like Mexico, India or arab countries. I dont know how people in Gambia really are.
>>16823869He didnt mention blueprints, he said technology, which includes manufacturing processes
>>16824877What a stupid question. Can you not see why a population with an average IQ of 85 (A), will not produce the same results as a population with an average IQ of 100 (B)? That means the average person from B is smarter than like 86% of people from A. But what matters is more the extreme, suppose 40% of the people of population A are useless mouth breathers much more prone to criminality (<80 IQ). Whilst in population B just <10%. On the other end it also means ~0.5% of population B is extremely intelligent (>140), while for A it's just ~0.01% -- 50x less. That means ~50x less hyper-able scientists, researchers etc., which does not just add up linearly. i.e. having 50 hyper-able mathematicians probably produces much more than just 50x 1 singular hyper able mathematician. There's also more factors than just IQ (hence why Japan, Korea, China are not exactly like Germany or Sweden), but IQ is of extreme importance.
>>16824906>. Can you not see why a population with an average IQ of 85 (A), will not produce the same results as a population with an average IQ of 100 (B)?To a point but i dont see such differences in most third world countries. Populations in eurasia in particular are not that different from those of the highest IQ countries, these places are not subsahara, and in south america the worst populations are segregated in favelas, the smart and the 90 IQ people can still do good things in proximity of homo erectus
>>16824906>>16824926This being said, i suspect the OP is from equatorial guinea
>>16823765>country A makes everything country B uses>how does country A know all our tech?!Truly a mystery
>>16824926Well, first world results is taken to mean something like Japan or Denmark. You probably won't get that with a population with an average IQ of ~90. But you can still have respectable countries. Like Turkey.
>>16825792I just dont think you need some large mass of very smart people doing original mathematics to have a decent country, even if the fraction of very high IQ people is like 2% of what you could find in Denmark. I dont see any poor country like Pakistan, India or Colombia being poor because of a lack of mathematicians or nerd people doing stereotypical nerd things. No one would say that based on an observation of their societies.You just dont walk through a third world slum and think gee these people need to learn differential geometry then they will be fine. No, you would just think they have social conflicts. In contrast you could see the villages of stone age tribes in Papua New Guinea or the amazon and see relatively healthy and happy people living in a clean environment and eating well, while not having a concept of zero nor a written language.
>>16825850Well, you zeroed in on the mathematicians. Consider what I said about what was labeled "useless mouth breathers". Having ~40% of your population being that vs ~10% is a big difference. And you seem to be talking specifically about creating a modern first world environment. A first world country is built and maintained by first world people (quickly decaying in large parts of the West obv). I don't doubt Australian Aboriginals could live in a healthy happy primitive environment.
>>16826048>And you seem to be talking specifically about creating a modern first world environment.My point is theres a dignified way to live with a lower level of technology and it has nothing to do with scientific research. Things like slums and filth and crime are social problems that i associate more with asymmetrical warfare.Dumb people can be docile as a rabbit and just push a broom, you have to watch out for the violent ones.
Although Chinese copy a lot, they still have creative potential. Their culture is weirdly unusual, they have previous history of inventing and hell lot of educated cheap brains. Which else nation would invent picrelated? Russians, on the other side, don't like to invent at all or discover, being an inventor is a miserable fate there. According to their culture it's considered much smarter to steal, buy etc. PhD students study how to revers engineer, often their theis is dedicated to studying some western stuff, it could be even paper translation. USSR had secret closed nuclear (and not only) cities and there they did some inventions. Basically a high-comfort jails for engineers. Interesting approach to science, isn't it?
>>16823765Everything is already manufactured there. So it's less reverse engineering and more stealing what the west ships to them to manufacture.
