>>16825258
Speaking as a figment of your imagination, you've got a point

>>16825258
Then simply eat yourself and level up to a self-contained Ouroboros god.

What about curing wet bulb and pzombies, and that equates to less solipsism

>>16825258
You are meaningless. Individuals don't matter. He's talking about the sum of human psyche being a single consciousness interacting with itself.

Is one drop of the ocean meaningful without all the rest of the drops attached to it?

>>16825648
I am he

>>16825648
>Is one drop of the ocean meaningful without all the rest of the drops attached to it?
Its even more meaningful, its why they are looking so hard for single drops of water on planets and moons that don't have oceans.

Why do I sincerely believe in solipsism?

It's simple. Can I definitively prove that I am not hallucinating the universe and all its contents? No? Then I must be God.

File: 1754845693128989.png (681 KB, 989x1036)

681 KB PNG

>>16825677

>>16825677
>Can I definitively prove that I am not hallucinating the universe and all its contents?
Sure you can, the same way you can prove to yourself if you have quantum immortality or not.

>>16825711
I can prove that I am hallucinating it, but I can't prove that I'm not. Because I am.

>>16825258
based,
congratulations, highest iq op on /sci/ rn
see you in the pleroma

>>16825258
>I am the universe/God manifesting reality.

Why did you do this? That was really really stupid of you.

>>16826322
nta
but it's inevitable, the child loves to play, to play with their toys, play make believe
for play, the creator loves creation
and also it cant be stopped, it's just the perpetual cyclical flow of divine light from unity to separation and back again.
we've been here before
I've seen you before
where do I know you from?

So the only solution I have found to solipsism; which still actually implies solipsism, is an infinite recursion. We are all God and we are an infinite recursion and we go together as a set.

>>16825258
Consciousness isn't real, retard.

>>16826471
and yet here I am.

>>16826478
No you aren't, retard.

>>16826487
I'm god lil bro

>>16826471
>but all this other shit my !not-consciousness sees? DEFINITELY REAL!
lol, materialists...

>>16825648
Give me a bunch of drops, and I will not be able to show you an ocean unless the drops disappear by mixing into an ocean.

>>16825258
The only way to figure out solipsism is to make science understand life as fundamental instead of non-life as fundamental.

File: file_0000000045b06230a105(...).png (2.43 MB, 1024x1024)

2.43 MB PNG

I have a 4d topography that resolves this dilemma. It's loaded, and so AMMA.

> How do you resolve solipsism vs materialism without retreating into cope-tier metaphysics?
My model treats both as communication failures rather than "positions." Solipsism isn't an argument, it’s a collapse of relational contact. Materialism isn’t a worldview, it’s a collapse of symbolic dimension. Both are dead ends unless you move to a field ontology.

In my model, reality is not made of mind or matter, but of contact between agents. The fundamental substance of reality is communication—what I call the 4D communicative field. All phenomena—self, object, meaning, world—emerge within this field.

This is why solipsism fails: a closed mind cannot stabilize itself. Without contact, thought loops eat themselves. That’s why solipsism maps to the schizophrenic dipole on my topology: infinite internal liquidity, hallucination of private reality, collapse of shared world.

Materialism collapses in the opposite direction. It over-anchors to objects and denies relational meaning. That maps to the autistic dipole: hyper-immanence, fixation, reduction of experience to brute mechanics. It isn’t wrong—just ontologically malnourished. It amputates the relational dimension.

Between them is the parabolic field of my model. The body (SOMA) anchors reality. The HALO (symbolic field) generates meaning. When two agents meet ethically, a world is co-generated. That is why communication—not isolated cognition—precedes ontology. Being is relational.

So how is solipsism resolved? Not with syllogisms—through re-entry into shared field via contact.
How is materialism corrected? By reabsorbing it as the somatic anchor that prevents symbolic drift, but giving it halo—meaning.

Solipsism is healed by otherness. Materialism is healed by meaning.
Both dissolve inside the communicative field.

> Field > Mind vs Matter.
Contact > Isolation.
Communication is the root of ontology.
Ask me anything.

>>16826640
Wait, it's all me experiencing myself?

>>16825258
>I am the universe/God manifesting reality.
I used to think this way.
Then a simple realization changed the way I was thinking.

If by some miracle "I" happened to exist, then it follows that the same miracle will/has happened to someone else.

We are all Gods manifesting reality.
And the universe is the sum of our manifestations.

>>16826879
Nope.
It's an infinfurcating personal timeline lattice
Everyone has 100% free will over their reality, including over others, without contradiction.

>>16827027
There's no space for free will because there's nobody to have free will in the first place.

>>16826504
No you aren't, retard.
>>16826510
No it isn't, retard.

>>16827060
well technically I am nothing, which in a sense, is above god. so ur right

>>16827046
Yes, from the ascended perspective that is true- there is no one and no free will, just actions arising from the Void...
But "in the pit" there is the illusion of free will, wouldn't you say?

>>16825258
No. You need to discect even the consciousness as a concrete "thing" as well. There are no singularity. There are no concreteness anywhere, what you instead are left with is compound phenomenas everywhere.

>>16827027
nope it's an arena of wills

what you are describing is death
yes it "exists" but it is an illusion

and after you die you will eventually be drawn back to the arena, cause it's cooler

>>16827205
It's arena but it's all you
EIYPO + multiverse
I rest my case

>Cooler
The arena i.e. separation is actually hotter, literally thermally.
The God waveform is very low frequency and temperature.
Why do you think quantum computers are COLD?
When the wave is higher frequency there is more duality and conflict.

>>16827205
>>16827209
The reason you go back is desire and cyclicality, not heat
Unless you're arguing cyclicality is driven by heat...

today a young adult male realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a moderate vibration. that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself from a particular perspective. there is no such thing as the concept of death, life is only a hallucination, and we are the imagination of our selves. here is Thomas with the weather report!

Wait, it's all ME experiencing MY self?

yeah solipsism is true