all the other tests are shit (outside of mensa), take this onehttps://openpsychometrics.org/tests/FSIQ/
>>16827884What causes someone to have such a discrepancy between their verbal IQ and spatial IQ
>>16827916autism. not even memeing or joking. sadly this implies that op has an inflated iq due to facets of iq scanning for tasks he hyperspecializes in, while being deficient in likely all other wakes of intelligence, for which verbal is merely a proxy.
>>16827916being esl so my vocab consist mostly of words used in everyday discourse
>>16827884You cheated you fucking idiot a HIGH IQ IS 100++ YOU SON OF A BITCH YOU KNOW HOW LONELY IT IS BEING HERE???????
>>16827923try doing the AGCT instead i frankly dont understand why verbal IQ is measured with vocab. understanding sentences and manipulating words is what should be tested
>>16827940sorri brua, hang in there little fellow ;((my fate of being a disguised midwit
is this good or bad asking for a friend of mine aha x
>>16827987damn are you dyspraxic? anyways i would disregard this result due to the huge discrepancy
>>16827991im good at sports, was in uni football team etc. its hard for me to visualize stuff i suppose. where to get an actual iq test then without falling into online scams
Am I le autism
>>16828001these tests have more of the purpose of diagnosing learning disorders than accurately estimating g. Thats why if you're neurodivergent your FSIQ isnt very indicative of your actual intelligence. anyway your spatial IQ is so low you most likely have a non verbal learning disorder
>>16828001i think it's best to just take it at mensa (not a shill btw), but I never took an iq test before so...
>>16827884The only accurate IQ test is your degree and paycheck
>>16828044so that means im retarted
Midwit across the board.It tracks I guess.
>>16828040take the wais IV and omit the lower g-loading subtests and calculate your average
>>16828069>t. midwitsigned, better than you.
>>16828128I was saying I was a midwit.
>>16828131I know. I'm rubbing it in.>MXS0Y
>>16828135Well my spatial is 2 whole points higher than yours so I'll arbitrarily decide that's the only one that really matters.Get wrecked, brainlet.
>>16828144Our biggest difference is visual memory. Meaning I can see a hot girl, and perfectly reconstruct her to jerk off to.
>>16828157But I mog you in mental rotation. As long as I have a picture on hand I can put her in any position I want.
>>16827884This test is retarded.>How many obscure words do you know>Trivial mental rotation task>Basic memorize brief pattern>Extremely tedious task which anyone normal will just randomly guess at>How good are you at recalling random symbols you glimpsed five seconds agoThe only one that wasn't completely retarded was the word scramble.Also, test caps out at around 150, so - like all the online tests that you faggots shill - it's designed for midwits.
I got the exact opposite tilt on the CAIT (verbal 110 > spatial=pri 103) so assuming this is BS
What is the midwit range?
If you want a fun comparison, take the test at peak ability then try it when you've had a stressful all nighter, I managed to drop three standard deviations once.
>>16828277this tb hnot a real test
>>16828491115 to 130.Above average enough to feel superior to normies but not enough to do anything meaningful with it.
>>16828515So the region most of /sci/ falls into...
>>16828516>He thinks most of /sci/ has triple digit IQ.
>>16828551Not in the threads you visit
I've written a couple of white papers, yet I suppose I'm still not smart enough for this test. How peculiar. To be fair, English is my fifth language, and I've had severe brain injuries in the past.
>>16828128I bow to your superior IQ
>>16828656wordlet kek
>>16828648>MR>4no excuses will get you out of this one
>>16828648>>16828672>A: -1
>>16828672>>16828676How cooked I am?
>>16828664it's not the size of the words, it's how you use them
>>16827953thanks for recommendation, too bad you have to pay to see answers, but I answered some questions and they were alright
>>16827884any IQ test that isn't free written and is multiple choice is worthless
>>16828909there should be some online calculators for it, its a pretty well known test
>>16828128>>16828656These two results I don't really understand compared to my own. I think they only really make sense if the first two categories of memory and verbal are weighted much higher than the other 4
>>16829062>i don't understand>allegedly 130your score is inflated.
>>16829084How exactly is it calculated then?
>>16829352I think you're right that some questions are weighted, but not necessarily only in the first two categories.
>>16828044>paycheckLMAO, poorfag detected.
>>16828277Retard take.
>>16827916In my case, English is my fourth language.
>>16827916>What causes someone to have such a discrepancy between their verbal IQ and spatial IQVerbababble isn't really g-loaded. It's literally a crutch that mentally deficient people can use to simulate reasoning about things they can never grasp. ChatGPT proves as much.
>>16829858language skill scalles pretty well with G.
>>16829858verbal acuity is the subtrait of iq that has one of the strongest g-loadings. the issue isn't that op has high g and that verbal quotient is dogshit. rather, op has low g, and autistically has anomalously high scores on other subtraits of iqs like a hyperspecialized retard.
>>16829891>>16829905I hereby eloquently dispute your proposition.
>>16829921ironic. you don't recognize that's a midwit's interpretation of high verbal fluency. no, i won't elaborate.
>>16829922I didn't suggest any "interpretations of verbal fluency". I did point out how language is used as a crutch by weak minds to simulate reasoning about concepts they can't actually grasp, which stands unrefuted.
>>16829928hilarious. even after i spelled it out, you still don't get it. this is why verbal fluency has such a high g-loading. to be even clearer, >I hereby eloquently dispute your proposition.this is an extremely low verbal fluency.
>>16829931See >>16829928> I did point out how language is used as a crutch by weak minds to simulate reasoning about concepts they can't actually grasp, which stands unrefuted.
This test is shit, I smoked a bong beforehand and English is my second language, still I got this scoret. that fag who always b you tfo
>>16829479Cope. My shitposts garner a higher IQ estimate than you at your best.
>>16830009a challenger approaches...
>>16829928>language is used as a crutch by weak minds to simulate reasoning about concepts they can't actually grasphow the fuck are you suppose to understand abstract concepts without thinking them through in your head? Is that why professors appear to be huge fucking retards when giving lectures? They have a deep understanding of the subject but can't verbalize or put into words why?
I don't see credibility at all with online "IQ testa" nor believe that human cognitive can be fixablely measurable, anyhow smarter individuals are an obvious thing...For those anons that scored high (>120s, 130s, 140s, ...) what are you studying or what do you majored? Just curious.
>>16827884What even is the point of FSIQ if what actually matters is the g-loading of the test you did
>>16830175IQ is a good metric for neurotypical people. If all your scores are within a standard deviation from each other it means your results are very accurate. Outside of normies IQ tests are used clinically to diagnose learning disorders which fucks with your results.
>>16830175>human cognitive can be fixablely measurableThat's not what IQ tests do. IQ tests measure correlation but not intelligence itself
>>16830169>how the fuck are you suppose to understand abstract concepts without thinking them through in your head?Kekt at your inability to even conceive of thinking without your crutch.
>>16830194I think you are a retard and just lack introspection
>>16830196What made you come to this conclusion?
>>16827884I always sucked at unscrambling words. Fuck that
>>16830175130+, physics phd; professor of physics at R2. fyi, this guy is a retard>>16829928>>16830194
>>16830177FSIQ has a g-loading, mouthbreather.
>>16830217>midwit seethes
>>16830222130+ isn't midwit, dimwit
>>16830223It is, but you're clearly below even that.
>115 "verbal IQ" intellectuals run into unfamiliar string of words>can't process it>throw 90 IQ tantrumsthe uniformity of this reaction kinda proves his point
>>16827916Cheating lmao
>>16827987Another cheater
>>16827884I scored 100 FSIQ 109 memory and 104 spatial The FSIQ calculation isn’t accurate but the rest are eh the memory portion is the only accurate one
>>16830227every time
I didn't speak until I was 3 or 4 so not surprised by the low verbal IQ
Hey, do you guys know any good anagrams games that part was pretty fun?
>>16830521ginger
>>16830240dipping my balls in gasoline
>>16830403real card counting autist detected
>>16830403is hyper specializing in spatial IQ actually useful? also how well do you do on raven matrices?
>>16830175I'm this anon >>16829062Dropped out of engineering in my 1st year, no further current qualification than a high school diploma, working in building design.>>16830790I usually score 135-145 on most IQ tests that are primarily raven matrices (except for the Ravens 2 which seems to have consistently inflated scores to me)I would say a more expansive memory and quick processing speed are the best traits to have in terms of day-to-day usefulness.
It varies by race fromn what I rememembereast asians tend to have a higher spatial compared to their verbal.I've always wondered if that explains why so many manga are incredibly well drawn but have a diabolically bad story
