all the other tests are shit (outside of mensa), take this onehttps://openpsychometrics.org/tests/FSIQ/
>>16827884What causes someone to have such a discrepancy between their verbal IQ and spatial IQ
>>16827916autism. not even memeing or joking. sadly this implies that op has an inflated iq due to facets of iq scanning for tasks he hyperspecializes in, while being deficient in likely all other wakes of intelligence, for which verbal is merely a proxy.
>>16827916being esl so my vocab consist mostly of words used in everyday discourse
>>16827884You cheated you fucking idiot a HIGH IQ IS 100++ YOU SON OF A BITCH YOU KNOW HOW LONELY IT IS BEING HERE???????
>>16827923try doing the AGCT instead i frankly dont understand why verbal IQ is measured with vocab. understanding sentences and manipulating words is what should be tested
>>16827940sorri brua, hang in there little fellow ;((my fate of being a disguised midwit
is this good or bad asking for a friend of mine aha x
>>16827987damn are you dyspraxic? anyways i would disregard this result due to the huge discrepancy
>>16827991im good at sports, was in uni football team etc. its hard for me to visualize stuff i suppose. where to get an actual iq test then without falling into online scams
Am I le autism
>>16828001these tests have more of the purpose of diagnosing learning disorders than accurately estimating g. Thats why if you're neurodivergent your FSIQ isnt very indicative of your actual intelligence. anyway your spatial IQ is so low you most likely have a non verbal learning disorder
>>16828001i think it's best to just take it at mensa (not a shill btw), but I never took an iq test before so...
>>16827884The only accurate IQ test is your degree and paycheck
>>16828044so that means im retarted
Midwit across the board.It tracks I guess.
>>16828040take the wais IV and omit the lower g-loading subtests and calculate your average
>>16828069>t. midwitsigned, better than you.
>>16828128I was saying I was a midwit.
>>16828131I know. I'm rubbing it in.>MXS0Y
>>16828135Well my spatial is 2 whole points higher than yours so I'll arbitrarily decide that's the only one that really matters.Get wrecked, brainlet.
>>16828144Our biggest difference is visual memory. Meaning I can see a hot girl, and perfectly reconstruct her to jerk off to.
>>16828157But I mog you in mental rotation. As long as I have a picture on hand I can put her in any position I want.
>>16827884This test is retarded.>How many obscure words do you know>Trivial mental rotation task>Basic memorize brief pattern>Extremely tedious task which anyone normal will just randomly guess at>How good are you at recalling random symbols you glimpsed five seconds agoThe only one that wasn't completely retarded was the word scramble.Also, test caps out at around 150, so - like all the online tests that you faggots shill - it's designed for midwits.
I got the exact opposite tilt on the CAIT (verbal 110 > spatial=pri 103) so assuming this is BS
What is the midwit range?
If you want a fun comparison, take the test at peak ability then try it when you've had a stressful all nighter, I managed to drop three standard deviations once.
>>16828277this tb hnot a real test
>>16828491115 to 130.Above average enough to feel superior to normies but not enough to do anything meaningful with it.
>>16828515So the region most of /sci/ falls into...
>>16828516>He thinks most of /sci/ has triple digit IQ.
>>16828551Not in the threads you visit
I've written a couple of white papers, yet I suppose I'm still not smart enough for this test. How peculiar. To be fair, English is my fifth language, and I've had severe brain injuries in the past.
>>16828128I bow to your superior IQ
>>16828656wordlet kek
>>16828648>MR>4no excuses will get you out of this one
>>16828648>>16828672>A: -1
>>16828672>>16828676How cooked I am?
>>16828664it's not the size of the words, it's how you use them
>>16827953thanks for recommendation, too bad you have to pay to see answers, but I answered some questions and they were alright
>>16827884any IQ test that isn't free written and is multiple choice is worthless
>>16828909there should be some online calculators for it, its a pretty well known test
>>16828128>>16828656These two results I don't really understand compared to my own. I think they only really make sense if the first two categories of memory and verbal are weighted much higher than the other 4
>>16829062>i don't understand>allegedly 130your score is inflated.
>>16829084How exactly is it calculated then?
>>16829352I think you're right that some questions are weighted, but not necessarily only in the first two categories.
>>16828044>paycheckLMAO, poorfag detected.
>>16828277Retard take.
>>16827916In my case, English is my fourth language.
>>16827916>What causes someone to have such a discrepancy between their verbal IQ and spatial IQVerbababble isn't really g-loaded. It's literally a crutch that mentally deficient people can use to simulate reasoning about things they can never grasp. ChatGPT proves as much.
>>16829858language skill scalles pretty well with G.
>>16829858verbal acuity is the subtrait of iq that has one of the strongest g-loadings. the issue isn't that op has high g and that verbal quotient is dogshit. rather, op has low g, and autistically has anomalously high scores on other subtraits of iqs like a hyperspecialized retard.
>>16829891>>16829905I hereby eloquently dispute your proposition.
>>16829921ironic. you don't recognize that's a midwit's interpretation of high verbal fluency. no, i won't elaborate.
>>16829922I didn't suggest any "interpretations of verbal fluency". I did point out how language is used as a crutch by weak minds to simulate reasoning about concepts they can't actually grasp, which stands unrefuted.
>>16829928hilarious. even after i spelled it out, you still don't get it. this is why verbal fluency has such a high g-loading. to be even clearer, >I hereby eloquently dispute your proposition.this is an extremely low verbal fluency.
>>16829931See >>16829928> I did point out how language is used as a crutch by weak minds to simulate reasoning about concepts they can't actually grasp, which stands unrefuted.
This test is shit, I smoked a bong beforehand and English is my second language, still I got this scoret. that fag who always b you tfo
>>16829479Cope. My shitposts garner a higher IQ estimate than you at your best.
>>16830009a challenger approaches...
>>16829928>language is used as a crutch by weak minds to simulate reasoning about concepts they can't actually grasphow the fuck are you suppose to understand abstract concepts without thinking them through in your head? Is that why professors appear to be huge fucking retards when giving lectures? They have a deep understanding of the subject but can't verbalize or put into words why?
I don't see credibility at all with online "IQ testa" nor believe that human cognitive can be fixablely measurable, anyhow smarter individuals are an obvious thing...For those anons that scored high (>120s, 130s, 140s, ...) what are you studying or what do you majored? Just curious.
>>16827884What even is the point of FSIQ if what actually matters is the g-loading of the test you did
>>16830175IQ is a good metric for neurotypical people. If all your scores are within a standard deviation from each other it means your results are very accurate. Outside of normies IQ tests are used clinically to diagnose learning disorders which fucks with your results.
>>16830175>human cognitive can be fixablely measurableThat's not what IQ tests do. IQ tests measure correlation but not intelligence itself
>>16830169>how the fuck are you suppose to understand abstract concepts without thinking them through in your head?Kekt at your inability to even conceive of thinking without your crutch.
>>16830194I think you are a retard and just lack introspection
>>16830196What made you come to this conclusion?
>>16827884I always sucked at unscrambling words. Fuck that
>>16830175130+, physics phd; professor of physics at R2. fyi, this guy is a retard>>16829928>>16830194
>>16830177FSIQ has a g-loading, mouthbreather.
>>16830217>midwit seethes
>>16830222130+ isn't midwit, dimwit
>>16830223It is, but you're clearly below even that.
>115 "verbal IQ" intellectuals run into unfamiliar string of words>can't process it>throw 90 IQ tantrumsthe uniformity of this reaction kinda proves his point
>>16827916Cheating lmao
>>16827987Another cheater
>>16827884I scored 100 FSIQ 109 memory and 104 spatial The FSIQ calculation isn’t accurate but the rest are eh the memory portion is the only accurate one
>>16830227every time
I didn't speak until I was 3 or 4 so not surprised by the low verbal IQ
Hey, do you guys know any good anagrams games that part was pretty fun?
>>16830521ginger
>>16830240dipping my balls in gasoline
>>16830403real card counting autist detected
>>16830403is hyper specializing in spatial IQ actually useful? also how well do you do on raven matrices?
>>16830175I'm this anon >>16829062Dropped out of engineering in my 1st year, no further current qualification than a high school diploma, working in building design.>>16830790I usually score 135-145 on most IQ tests that are primarily raven matrices (except for the Ravens 2 which seems to have consistently inflated scores to me)I would say a more expansive memory and quick processing speed are the best traits to have in terms of day-to-day usefulness.
It varies by race fromn what I rememembereast asians tend to have a higher spatial compared to their verbal.I've always wondered if that explains why so many manga are incredibly well drawn but have a diabolically bad story
>>16830908>I SCORE 135-145 ON IQ TESTS!!! OMG cant discover shit or right a phd thesis worth a damnok nigga go lie somewhere else with your frauding buddies
>>16831109Why would I lie? There's nothing to be gained out of that. If it isn't apparent by the fact I mentioned I dropped out of entry level college, I generally lack motivation and am quite mentally ill.
>>16827987You're jewish>>16831109>right a phdindian/chinese phd fraudmill hands wrote this post
>>16827884test sucks; JCTI is more fun
>>16831183>>16831220None of you are 140+ MRI’m 135 RAW ON RAPM set 2 NIGGA 113 FSIQ
>>16827884>89 verbal IQsorry I don't understand what you are saying
>>16831811>Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!
>>16831300autistic shapecel
How reliable is this test?I get it isn't professional, but is it the best out there that's for free?
also, what are other free iq tests with high g-loading made specifically for us hyperspecialized high spatial iq autistic hobbists
>>16832409Years ago I found some guy's personal site that contained a collection of high range iq tests.I have absolutely no idea what the link was but I think I saw it here so they do at least exist.
>>16832033guilty as charged>>16830175I major in being a failure it's going well
The only point of online IQ tests is to jerk off to the meaningless and unrealistically high result you'll get without effort
first test i always chose 5 cause i didn't read, then i was in cs2 match and all memory ones i did kind of randomly associating what would normies put in the same round. then unscrambled 4-5 words i also did kind of randomly. the closest point thingy was pretty cool and the geometric thingy.also eng second language, how do you even get less than 120?
>>16834054re-did it for ego.these tests do get easier if you have good memory but i barely remembered the first.memory one is maybe just short term memory, spatial is pretty good but you kind of have to take one first to understand its not the lowest common distance but the closest to all points. again, i refuse to read. verbal = be english lol
i feel stupid for always getting baited into taking these tests. does getting a decent score even mean anything, other than stroking you ego? also, how do they get the full scale value if not a simple average of the 3? i am kinda salty how memory drags mine down so much, especially considering it can literally be cheated with a piece of paper and probably matters the least in actual reasoning abilities
>>16828157>>16828159You niggas need to work together
lmao none of you midwits come close to the god gamer himself
>>16834329Is using string theory I can't fix his geometrical aproximationsAnd yes this make people think they are just repeating mistakes
>>16834340markov? on this board? its an honor
>>16832252>is it the best out there that's for free?No, in fact it's held in relatively low regard from what I can tell, though it still has a moderate correlation to scores from better tests so it's not totally worthless.
>>16830240cheating how
>>16827884is my brain good enough to study physics? i wanna change my major, but i'm honestly not sure if i'm smart enough. i know a shitty online test doesn't mean much, but there's gotta be some correlation here, right?
This one is good. You can practice all you want. It's dynamic so your practice won't help https://brght.org/
>>16827884I scored 130 on the WAIS-IV and 131 on the WAIS-III, administered by real life neuropsychologists. So this one is definitely a bit easier than a serious test.
>>16834606I'm actually pissed because my phone browser wouldn't respond at question 25. It timed out. Verified my identity. Booted me ahead, marked my question wrong, then gave me 30 seconds for the next. Waited for it to time out. Marked wrong again and continued. So I lost all my clock for the last few and got two flagged wrong for no reason. Drank a six pack btw.
>>16834645congrats you cheated nigger
>>16834606Probably shouldn't have done this drunk.
>>16834812Drunk and sleep deprived is the best time to do it.
>>16834606>https://brght.org/This shit stopped responding around 30 questions in then switched to cloudflare and demanded my email
Back in black baby. Autism confirmed, still recovering from psychoticism. Maybe Im fully there in like 5 years.
>>16834881Im not ann english fag btw. English is my second
>>16834606Those add these grids together things messed with me for a while, after that the weight comparisons were a bit of a headache, not good with fractions on fly got to L16 whatever that means
>>16827884I thought I got dumber after years of depression but I still got it.
I scored 150 on a legitimate IQ test when I was 13, but I don't know how much that carries over to adulthood.
>>16839964You know those articles about genius blacks who score high on iq tests compared to their piers that get spammed everywhere?
>>16840254>blackshe's just melaninized.
>>16840254>>16840260The thing is, I'm white.
>>16828001Go to a lab that specializes in assessing IQ and pay about a grand. It ought to include an in person interview. Unfortunately, most of these clinics are ideologically pozzed, if not ethnically captured. e.g., Kaplan. This Ai list of sixteen words are cited as common in 140+ IQ unit: abdicate, brazen, conundrum, contingent, cobbler, dire, enunciate, fastidious, famish, gullible, inferior, loathe, parched, quaint, rescind, vapid.
grug mode engaged
>>16834606
>>16839964>when I was 13childhood iq scores are inflated by explicit design
>>16841459>34/40>137110 max
My brain is weird
damn. same score I've gotten on every test i've taken in the past, ~115.recently got medicated for adhd and been doing some brain training stuff that truly genuinely has been helping, but still mid. shame.weird that my highest score was in spatial reasoning and my lowest was in verbal. I've always been a very strong reader but i've definitely been slacking off, and i've been having a bit of trouble with visualization recently but I guess ADHD meds and brain training helped pick me up. kinda gives me hope, I guess.
>>16827884My first test score from 2021...Since then, have tried redoing sections for double perfect scores. Doesn't lead to the elusive "160." The memory is glitched at 84/85 and the verbal at 30/34
>>16843025try without your adhd meds, it reduces your iq
>>16843266The ADHD meds actually boosts IQ performance. ADHD addled faggots have 100-110 IQ at best and when on stimulants can get in the 110-120 range. Try it yourself. This increase is true for all people on caffeine, the most widely used nootropic.
>>16843266>try without your adhd meds, it reduces your iq>>16843631>ADHD addled faggots have 100-110 IQ at best and when on stimulants can get in the 110-120 range.i don't think either of these statements are true, friends.>>16843025although looking at it now with more optimistic eyes, that memory score is really good for me, i most definitely would not have scored that high two months ago. i think that can be attributed to N-Back training.still kinda shocked about how low my verbal IQ came out to be, the last time i took this test was about 4 years ago and i distinctly remember, (again, 100% thanks to N-Back), my verbal being somewhere in the 120s.but it makes sense, I've been letting my brain rot for years now. only just started doing truly mentally demanding activities again these past few months, meds pulled me out of a pretty nasty rut.this really is pretty helpful. I've been noticing recently that extracting meaning from text and speaking has been a lot more difficult than it has any reason to be. just pinned it on ADHD distractability and letting my brain fall into disrepair, didn't give it much thought and my solution was just to eventually make a reading/writing habit, something i wanted to do anyways.but about 5-6 months ago i did some relational frame training with syllogimous v.2 for a few days. dropped it pretty quick but i remember that while doing it i massively strengthened my ability to grasp and manipulate information in my mind using mental webs, it was pretty cool. my imagination improved, my memory improved and of course my comprehension improved too.i think i dropped it because i wasn't using it for anything at the time so it just felt like a waste of time and energy, but i'm definitely going to give it another go now. it'll probably work quite well with N-Back training, can't wait.The easier learning is in terms of comprehension the more i'll be willing to learn and there sure are a lot of things i'd like to learn about :)
>>16843746also also a big reason i scored so low on the verbal bit was because i didn't fully take into account the instructions for the anagrams section. seeing the timer go down made me anxiously pick any box that looked like it had enough vowels and consonants to be a real word, meaning i got -1 points rather than just 0 had I not clicked on any I wasn't completely sure about. you can see, 8/24, is an abysmal score, but then again, isn't failing to logically act on the instructions given an indication of IQ? maybe, im not sure in this case, probably.still tells me that i have some amount of untapped potential, taking time to internalize instructions is a trainable skill. not to mention lifestyle. i live like a literal troglodyte. that probably has a pretty big impact on cognition.
>>16843631so that's why people on meth/amphetamines get really inventive and have the biggest motivation to do random ass shitalso coffee is a good stimulant, after a lengthy break I started making myself some coffee in lower doses, and oh shit one day I felt so productive running around in basement dusting off some boxes with old stuff and moving them around for some reason, for one day I felt that my le brain fog and le depression was finally resolved until shit went to normal state
>>16843746>>16843757Pure midwit copium lmfao
>>16843796take. it. back.or else...
>>16843631What if I'm 130-140 on and off meds?
>>16827921>>16829905>spatial iq: literally just exist and use your eyes, idk>verbal iq: be native, read tons of books, be good in school, learn to write eloquently, write academic papers, etc. etc. >ahkcually verbal iq is a true indicator of gmidwit retard cope "iq" subsetyou are low g and no book you will ever read will change thatkeep studying funny little words nerd
What's the answer? I think it's impossible or edited.
>>16845140Clean puzzle, I like it. Where is it from?
>>16845107I never read books and have stronger verbal fluency than you. Verbal g loading is tied to working memory, creativity and the rhythm of your words. No amount of erudition will train this ability; learning five dollar words and complex punctuation won't give you verbal fluency.
>>16845186whatever you say wordcelyou'd probably struggle with even solving the easy as fuck puzzle aboveif verbal iq is of any more value than my shit then chatgpt would be the smartest super intelligence on this planet and mog us allmost useless iq subset ever
>>16845194Chatgpt, model 5, STILL cannot tell you that with high accuracy how many times the letter 'r' occurs in the word strawberry. If you understood this, or how llms in general work, you'd not say something so dumb. Since I can tell you're not playing with a full deck of cards, I'll clarify further. Anyone with a high verbal IQ can count how many times 'r' occurs in the word strawberry. Gpt cannot. Therefore it must be the case that IF verbal IQ has any meaning when applied to llms, it must be low. Understand, retard?
>>16845140do you have to select a row as the answer or any 3?
>>168451409 hours later and still no one has solved it...>>16845405any 3
>>16827884What the fuck does memory have to do with intelligence? Is a database intelligent? Lmao. Every year supposed "IQ tests" just get more and more of a joke. Ironically people who are actually smart reject pseudoscience like psychology because it is not rigorous enough.
>>16845421Working memory is absolutely related to intelligence or brain power. Your analogy is actually apt. Try running windows 11 on a laptop from 1995. You can't. Just like QFT is completely beyond your brains ability to understand.
>>16845412>any 3fugg
>>16845487I understand QFT easily. Subatomic particles are just excitations in the field. EZ
>>16845494Okay, what's the difference between the first and second quantization? You and I both know you don't know. Copy and pasting AI will be obvious to anyone who knows. Checkmate. Get a better brain before you try to play this game.
>>16845498First quantization is what you do in regular quantum mechanics—you take classical particles with definite positions and momenta and turn those variables into operators acting on wavefunctions. So you’ve got a fixed number of particles, and the wavefunction tells you the probability amplitude for where each one might be.Second quantization (quantum field theory) flips that idea. Instead of treating particles as fundamental, you quantize the field itself. The field becomes an operator that can create or destroy particles. The number of particles isn’t fixed anymore; it can fluctuate because interactions can produce or annihilate them. In that sense, “particles” are just excitations of the underlying field.And yeah, I’m not an AI. If I were, I’d probably say something stilted or try to sound overly polite. I just know how to explain this stuff without hiding behind buzzwords or auto-generated filler.
>>16845503I accept your concession, Mr. GPT
>>16827884I put in the minimum effort and did it in like five minutes
i feel like i got so many wrong. Especially with the memory ones. I know my short term memory is fucked because I've smoked so much weed in my life, I'll probably forget I even took this test a few minutes from now. Also I know I'm an idiot.
>>16845140WHAT THE FUCK DOES THIS MEAN
>Intelligence test>Tests whether you memorized the meaning of obscure words>If anything, that negatively correlates with intelligence
>>168451402, 5, 6
>>16847768Explain why.
>>16845140That's actually very simple and clever: you have to find the 3 that's doesn't have more than x common pixels with the others squares, which are 3, 7, 9
>>16840631These are considered 140 IQ words?
>>16827916Non-English speaker.I took this test a few years ago. I scored ~137 each in memory and in spatial, and just ~110 or maybe even less in verbal.
>>16827884This IQ test is bad for measuring the high range. High range IQ tests are without a time limit and the interactive tests are a more about short term, rote memorization instead of IQ.
>>168451401,4,8
>>16845140since someone has yet to solve this i will gladly proclaim my intellectual supremacy over this thread and this entire board while i'm at itthe solution is, undeniably, 2-9-5no, i will not elaborateunless someone begs nicely enoughthis puzzle is easy as fuck btwverbal is a fake index
>>16845140first box has more red than black, second more black than red, and it alternatesthe rest of the information is noise to trip you up
>>16827884What even is verbal iq
>>16849201>verbal is a fake indexEstimated IQ: 86 (average)
>>16849451solve the puzzle, wordcel
>>16845140Wasting your time analyzing contrived patterns is a low-g trait.
>>16848267>>16849201>>16849216Who is right?
>>16848407fewer
>>16849800less is correct there
>>16849755You know who's right. Clever people don't brag. Also is a solution where counting squares on a 81 dot patterns realistic solve to you?
>>16850056
>>16850079You don't know either, but counting red and black dots doesn't give you the answer, because multiple candidates are valid. So no, this isn't a criteria that allows you to solve the puzzle.
>>16850391a criterion
+ he doesn't know
>>16845494now explain the proof of the unramified geometric langlands conjecture
Whatever
>>16850056Any pattern is possible. More complex ones require more creativity. What's next?{1,2,3,4,...}The traditional answer is 5. I implore you to think about how 0 might be an answer.
>>16850839>More complex ones require more creativity.No, they don't. >I implore you to think about how 0 might be an answer.Because S(i) = i mod 5. Not the answer you had in mind? Too bad, retard. It's a great answer according to your view.
>>16850843
>>16850869What's your meme supposed to indicate? That you're about to engage in a "creative argument" (AKA mental gymanstics)? Either way, they say limitation breeds creativity for a reason, brainlet.
>>16850872solve the puzzle debatecel
>>16843130160 is possible
>>16827884I've done this test before and get between 141 and 145.Not that it matters as I'm an uneducated, unemployed tard with no impulse control, so either iq testing is bullshit and let's morons like me through or iq alone isn't a valuable metric.
>>16843631it's kinda like you're saying caffeine makes you faster lol. You do need enough energy, but I hate the way meth makes people act. I don't even like how I act on caffeine. I try not to but there's a chance I will just say or do something idk too assertive and in the wrong moment that is a murder fr. They've shown that caffeine impairs hippocampus based learning. It puts you on autopilot to some extent which helps you grind out your chores. But there are boosts and real improvements. You should definitely focus on anything that can really improve your iq even just in short term but as high as your iq might be and as fast as you can solve some issues idk I'm a speed freak myself but you should still exercise patience sometimes to get the best result and caffeine will fr work against you
>>16852581High iq people should actually get used but low iq people are too stupid, we should actually all get rounded up and forced to answer questions bc we won't do it ourselves
>>16848390yeah shit is crazy but 140 did sound a little low like no way am I only 140. In the grand scheme of things iq range is more like at least negative 1000 to positive 1000
>>16852511No need to care about the score anymore, need the solutions
