all the other tests are shit (outside of mensa), take this onehttps://openpsychometrics.org/tests/FSIQ/
>>16827884What causes someone to have such a discrepancy between their verbal IQ and spatial IQ
>>16827916autism. not even memeing or joking. sadly this implies that op has an inflated iq due to facets of iq scanning for tasks he hyperspecializes in, while being deficient in likely all other wakes of intelligence, for which verbal is merely a proxy.
>>16827916being esl so my vocab consist mostly of words used in everyday discourse
>>16827884You cheated you fucking idiot a HIGH IQ IS 100++ YOU SON OF A BITCH YOU KNOW HOW LONELY IT IS BEING HERE???????
>>16827923try doing the AGCT instead i frankly dont understand why verbal IQ is measured with vocab. understanding sentences and manipulating words is what should be tested
>>16827940sorri brua, hang in there little fellow ;((my fate of being a disguised midwit
is this good or bad asking for a friend of mine aha x
>>16827987damn are you dyspraxic? anyways i would disregard this result due to the huge discrepancy
>>16827991im good at sports, was in uni football team etc. its hard for me to visualize stuff i suppose. where to get an actual iq test then without falling into online scams
Am I le autism
>>16828001these tests have more of the purpose of diagnosing learning disorders than accurately estimating g. Thats why if you're neurodivergent your FSIQ isnt very indicative of your actual intelligence. anyway your spatial IQ is so low you most likely have a non verbal learning disorder
>>16828001i think it's best to just take it at mensa (not a shill btw), but I never took an iq test before so...
>>16827884The only accurate IQ test is your degree and paycheck
>>16828044so that means im retarted
Midwit across the board.It tracks I guess.
>>16828040take the wais IV and omit the lower g-loading subtests and calculate your average
>>16828069>t. midwitsigned, better than you.
>>16828128I was saying I was a midwit.
>>16828131I know. I'm rubbing it in.>MXS0Y
>>16828135Well my spatial is 2 whole points higher than yours so I'll arbitrarily decide that's the only one that really matters.Get wrecked, brainlet.
>>16828144Our biggest difference is visual memory. Meaning I can see a hot girl, and perfectly reconstruct her to jerk off to.
>>16828157But I mog you in mental rotation. As long as I have a picture on hand I can put her in any position I want.
>>16827884This test is retarded.>How many obscure words do you know>Trivial mental rotation task>Basic memorize brief pattern>Extremely tedious task which anyone normal will just randomly guess at>How good are you at recalling random symbols you glimpsed five seconds agoThe only one that wasn't completely retarded was the word scramble.Also, test caps out at around 150, so - like all the online tests that you faggots shill - it's designed for midwits.
I got the exact opposite tilt on the CAIT (verbal 110 > spatial=pri 103) so assuming this is BS
What is the midwit range?
If you want a fun comparison, take the test at peak ability then try it when you've had a stressful all nighter, I managed to drop three standard deviations once.
>>16828277this tb hnot a real test
>>16828491115 to 130.Above average enough to feel superior to normies but not enough to do anything meaningful with it.
>>16828515So the region most of /sci/ falls into...
>>16828516>He thinks most of /sci/ has triple digit IQ.
>>16828551Not in the threads you visit
I've written a couple of white papers, yet I suppose I'm still not smart enough for this test. How peculiar. To be fair, English is my fifth language, and I've had severe brain injuries in the past.
>>16828128I bow to your superior IQ
>>16828656wordlet kek
>>16828648>MR>4no excuses will get you out of this one
>>16828648>>16828672>A: -1
>>16828672>>16828676How cooked I am?
>>16828664it's not the size of the words, it's how you use them
>>16827953thanks for recommendation, too bad you have to pay to see answers, but I answered some questions and they were alright
>>16827884any IQ test that isn't free written and is multiple choice is worthless
>>16828909there should be some online calculators for it, its a pretty well known test
>>16828128>>16828656These two results I don't really understand compared to my own. I think they only really make sense if the first two categories of memory and verbal are weighted much higher than the other 4
>>16829062>i don't understand>allegedly 130your score is inflated.
>>16829084How exactly is it calculated then?
>>16829352I think you're right that some questions are weighted, but not necessarily only in the first two categories.
>>16828044>paycheckLMAO, poorfag detected.
>>16828277Retard take.
>>16827916In my case, English is my fourth language.
>>16827916>What causes someone to have such a discrepancy between their verbal IQ and spatial IQVerbababble isn't really g-loaded. It's literally a crutch that mentally deficient people can use to simulate reasoning about things they can never grasp. ChatGPT proves as much.
>>16829858language skill scalles pretty well with G.
>>16829858verbal acuity is the subtrait of iq that has one of the strongest g-loadings. the issue isn't that op has high g and that verbal quotient is dogshit. rather, op has low g, and autistically has anomalously high scores on other subtraits of iqs like a hyperspecialized retard.
>>16829891>>16829905I hereby eloquently dispute your proposition.
>>16829921ironic. you don't recognize that's a midwit's interpretation of high verbal fluency. no, i won't elaborate.
>>16829922I didn't suggest any "interpretations of verbal fluency". I did point out how language is used as a crutch by weak minds to simulate reasoning about concepts they can't actually grasp, which stands unrefuted.
>>16829928hilarious. even after i spelled it out, you still don't get it. this is why verbal fluency has such a high g-loading. to be even clearer, >I hereby eloquently dispute your proposition.this is an extremely low verbal fluency.
>>16829931See >>16829928> I did point out how language is used as a crutch by weak minds to simulate reasoning about concepts they can't actually grasp, which stands unrefuted.
This test is shit, I smoked a bong beforehand and English is my second language, still I got this scoret. that fag who always b you tfo
>>16829479Cope. My shitposts garner a higher IQ estimate than you at your best.
>>16830009a challenger approaches...
>>16829928>language is used as a crutch by weak minds to simulate reasoning about concepts they can't actually grasphow the fuck are you suppose to understand abstract concepts without thinking them through in your head? Is that why professors appear to be huge fucking retards when giving lectures? They have a deep understanding of the subject but can't verbalize or put into words why?
I don't see credibility at all with online "IQ testa" nor believe that human cognitive can be fixablely measurable, anyhow smarter individuals are an obvious thing...For those anons that scored high (>120s, 130s, 140s, ...) what are you studying or what do you majored? Just curious.
>>16827884What even is the point of FSIQ if what actually matters is the g-loading of the test you did
>>16830175IQ is a good metric for neurotypical people. If all your scores are within a standard deviation from each other it means your results are very accurate. Outside of normies IQ tests are used clinically to diagnose learning disorders which fucks with your results.
>>16830175>human cognitive can be fixablely measurableThat's not what IQ tests do. IQ tests measure correlation but not intelligence itself
>>16830169>how the fuck are you suppose to understand abstract concepts without thinking them through in your head?Kekt at your inability to even conceive of thinking without your crutch.
>>16830194I think you are a retard and just lack introspection
>>16830196What made you come to this conclusion?
>>16827884I always sucked at unscrambling words. Fuck that
>>16830175130+, physics phd; professor of physics at R2. fyi, this guy is a retard>>16829928>>16830194
>>16830177FSIQ has a g-loading, mouthbreather.
>>16830217>midwit seethes
>>16830222130+ isn't midwit, dimwit
>>16830223It is, but you're clearly below even that.
>115 "verbal IQ" intellectuals run into unfamiliar string of words>can't process it>throw 90 IQ tantrumsthe uniformity of this reaction kinda proves his point
>>16827916Cheating lmao
>>16827987Another cheater
>>16827884I scored 100 FSIQ 109 memory and 104 spatial The FSIQ calculation isn’t accurate but the rest are eh the memory portion is the only accurate one
>>16830227every time
Hey, do you guys know any good anagrams games that part was pretty fun?
>>16830521ginger
>>16830240dipping my balls in gasoline
>>16830403is hyper specializing in spatial IQ actually useful? also how well do you do on raven matrices?
>>16830175I'm this anon >>16829062Dropped out of engineering in my 1st year, no further current qualification than a high school diploma, working in building design.>>16830790I usually score 135-145 on most IQ tests that are primarily raven matrices (except for the Ravens 2 which seems to have consistently inflated scores to me)I would say a more expansive memory and quick processing speed are the best traits to have in terms of day-to-day usefulness.
It varies by race fromn what I rememembereast asians tend to have a higher spatial compared to their verbal.I've always wondered if that explains why so many manga are incredibly well drawn but have a diabolically bad story
>>16830908>I SCORE 135-145 ON IQ TESTS!!! OMG cant discover shit or right a phd thesis worth a damnok nigga go lie somewhere else with your frauding buddies
>>16831109Why would I lie? There's nothing to be gained out of that. If it isn't apparent by the fact I mentioned I dropped out of entry level college, I generally lack motivation and am quite mentally ill.
>>16827987You're jewish>>16831109>right a phdindian/chinese phd fraudmill hands wrote this post
>>16827884test sucks; JCTI is more fun
>>16831183>>16831220None of you are 140+ MRI’m 135 RAW ON RAPM set 2 NIGGA 113 FSIQ
>>16827884>89 verbal IQsorry I don't understand what you are saying
>>16831811>Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!
>>16831300autistic shapecel
How reliable is this test?I get it isn't professional, but is it the best out there that's for free?
also, what are other free iq tests with high g-loading made specifically for us hyperspecialized high spatial iq autistic hobbists
>>16832409Years ago I found some guy's personal site that contained a collection of high range iq tests.I have absolutely no idea what the link was but I think I saw it here so they do at least exist.
>>16832033guilty as charged>>16830175I major in being a failure it's going well
The only point of online IQ tests is to jerk off to the meaningless and unrealistically high result you'll get without effort
first test i always chose 5 cause i didn't read, then i was in cs2 match and all memory ones i did kind of randomly associating what would normies put in the same round. then unscrambled 4-5 words i also did kind of randomly. the closest point thingy was pretty cool and the geometric thingy.also eng second language, how do you even get less than 120?
>>16834054re-did it for ego.these tests do get easier if you have good memory but i barely remembered the first.memory one is maybe just short term memory, spatial is pretty good but you kind of have to take one first to understand its not the lowest common distance but the closest to all points. again, i refuse to read. verbal = be english lol
i feel stupid for always getting baited into taking these tests. does getting a decent score even mean anything, other than stroking you ego? also, how do they get the full scale value if not a simple average of the 3? i am kinda salty how memory drags mine down so much, especially considering it can literally be cheated with a piece of paper and probably matters the least in actual reasoning abilities
>>16828157>>16828159You niggas need to work together
lmao none of you midwits come close to the god gamer himself
>>16834329Is using string theory I can't fix his geometrical aproximationsAnd yes this make people think they are just repeating mistakes
>>16834340markov? on this board? its an honor
>>16832252>is it the best out there that's for free?No, in fact it's held in relatively low regard from what I can tell, though it still has a moderate correlation to scores from better tests so it's not totally worthless.
>>16830240cheating how
>>16827884is my brain good enough to study physics? i wanna change my major, but i'm honestly not sure if i'm smart enough. i know a shitty online test doesn't mean much, but there's gotta be some correlation here, right?
This one is good. You can practice all you want. It's dynamic so your practice won't help https://brght.org/
>>16827884I scored 130 on the WAIS-IV and 131 on the WAIS-III, administered by real life neuropsychologists. So this one is definitely a bit easier than a serious test.
>>16834606I'm actually pissed because my phone browser wouldn't respond at question 25. It timed out. Verified my identity. Booted me ahead, marked my question wrong, then gave me 30 seconds for the next. Waited for it to time out. Marked wrong again and continued. So I lost all my clock for the last few and got two flagged wrong for no reason. Drank a six pack btw.
>>16834645congrats you cheated nigger
>>16834606Probably shouldn't have done this drunk.
>>16834812Drunk and sleep deprived is the best time to do it.
>>16834606>https://brght.org/This shit stopped responding around 30 questions in then switched to cloudflare and demanded my email
Back in black baby. Autism confirmed, still recovering from psychoticism. Maybe Im fully there in like 5 years.
>>16834881Im not ann english fag btw. English is my second
>>16834606Those add these grids together things messed with me for a while, after that the weight comparisons were a bit of a headache, not good with fractions on fly got to L16 whatever that means
>>16827884I thought I got dumber after years of depression but I still got it.
I scored 150 on a legitimate IQ test when I was 13, but I don't know how much that carries over to adulthood.
>>16839964You know those articles about genius blacks who score high on iq tests compared to their piers that get spammed everywhere?
>>16840254>blackshe's just melaninized.
>>16840254>>16840260The thing is, I'm white.
>>16828001Go to a lab that specializes in assessing IQ and pay about a grand. It ought to include an in person interview. Unfortunately, most of these clinics are ideologically pozzed, if not ethnically captured. e.g., Kaplan. This Ai list of sixteen words are cited as common in 140+ IQ unit: abdicate, brazen, conundrum, contingent, cobbler, dire, enunciate, fastidious, famish, gullible, inferior, loathe, parched, quaint, rescind, vapid.
grug mode engaged
>>16834606
>>16839964>when I was 13childhood iq scores are inflated by explicit design
>>16841459>34/40>137110 max
My brain is weird
damn. same score I've gotten on every test i've taken in the past, ~115.recently got medicated for adhd and been doing some brain training stuff that truly genuinely has been helping, but still mid. shame.weird that my highest score was in spatial reasoning and my lowest was in verbal. I've always been a very strong reader but i've definitely been slacking off, and i've been having a bit of trouble with visualization recently but I guess ADHD meds and brain training helped pick me up. kinda gives me hope, I guess.
>>16827884My first test score from 2021...Since then, have tried redoing sections for double perfect scores. Doesn't lead to the elusive "160." The memory is glitched at 84/85 and the verbal at 30/34
>>16843025try without your adhd meds, it reduces your iq
>>16843266The ADHD meds actually boosts IQ performance. ADHD addled faggots have 100-110 IQ at best and when on stimulants can get in the 110-120 range. Try it yourself. This increase is true for all people on caffeine, the most widely used nootropic.
>>16843266>try without your adhd meds, it reduces your iq>>16843631>ADHD addled faggots have 100-110 IQ at best and when on stimulants can get in the 110-120 range.i don't think either of these statements are true, friends.>>16843025although looking at it now with more optimistic eyes, that memory score is really good for me, i most definitely would not have scored that high two months ago. i think that can be attributed to N-Back training.still kinda shocked about how low my verbal IQ came out to be, the last time i took this test was about 4 years ago and i distinctly remember, (again, 100% thanks to N-Back), my verbal being somewhere in the 120s.but it makes sense, I've been letting my brain rot for years now. only just started doing truly mentally demanding activities again these past few months, meds pulled me out of a pretty nasty rut.this really is pretty helpful. I've been noticing recently that extracting meaning from text and speaking has been a lot more difficult than it has any reason to be. just pinned it on ADHD distractability and letting my brain fall into disrepair, didn't give it much thought and my solution was just to eventually make a reading/writing habit, something i wanted to do anyways.but about 5-6 months ago i did some relational frame training with syllogimous v.2 for a few days. dropped it pretty quick but i remember that while doing it i massively strengthened my ability to grasp and manipulate information in my mind using mental webs, it was pretty cool. my imagination improved, my memory improved and of course my comprehension improved too.i think i dropped it because i wasn't using it for anything at the time so it just felt like a waste of time and energy, but i'm definitely going to give it another go now. it'll probably work quite well with N-Back training, can't wait.The easier learning is in terms of comprehension the more i'll be willing to learn and there sure are a lot of things i'd like to learn about :)
>>16843746also also a big reason i scored so low on the verbal bit was because i didn't fully take into account the instructions for the anagrams section. seeing the timer go down made me anxiously pick any box that looked like it had enough vowels and consonants to be a real word, meaning i got -1 points rather than just 0 had I not clicked on any I wasn't completely sure about. you can see, 8/24, is an abysmal score, but then again, isn't failing to logically act on the instructions given an indication of IQ? maybe, im not sure in this case, probably.still tells me that i have some amount of untapped potential, taking time to internalize instructions is a trainable skill. not to mention lifestyle. i live like a literal troglodyte. that probably has a pretty big impact on cognition.
>>16843631so that's why people on meth/amphetamines get really inventive and have the biggest motivation to do random ass shitalso coffee is a good stimulant, after a lengthy break I started making myself some coffee in lower doses, and oh shit one day I felt so productive running around in basement dusting off some boxes with old stuff and moving them around for some reason, for one day I felt that my le brain fog and le depression was finally resolved until shit went to normal state
>>16843746>>16843757Pure midwit copium lmfao
>>16843796take. it. back.or else...
>>16843631What if I'm 130-140 on and off meds?
>>16827921>>16829905>spatial iq: literally just exist and use your eyes, idk>verbal iq: be native, read tons of books, be good in school, learn to write eloquently, write academic papers, etc. etc. >ahkcually verbal iq is a true indicator of gmidwit retard cope "iq" subsetyou are low g and no book you will ever read will change thatkeep studying funny little words nerd
What's the answer? I think it's impossible or edited.
>>16845140Clean puzzle, I like it. Where is it from?
>>16845107I never read books and have stronger verbal fluency than you. Verbal g loading is tied to working memory, creativity and the rhythm of your words. No amount of erudition will train this ability; learning five dollar words and complex punctuation won't give you verbal fluency.
>>16845186whatever you say wordcelyou'd probably struggle with even solving the easy as fuck puzzle aboveif verbal iq is of any more value than my shit then chatgpt would be the smartest super intelligence on this planet and mog us allmost useless iq subset ever
>>16845194Chatgpt, model 5, STILL cannot tell you that with high accuracy how many times the letter 'r' occurs in the word strawberry. If you understood this, or how llms in general work, you'd not say something so dumb. Since I can tell you're not playing with a full deck of cards, I'll clarify further. Anyone with a high verbal IQ can count how many times 'r' occurs in the word strawberry. Gpt cannot. Therefore it must be the case that IF verbal IQ has any meaning when applied to llms, it must be low. Understand, retard?
>>16845140do you have to select a row as the answer or any 3?
>>168451409 hours later and still no one has solved it...>>16845405any 3
>>16827884What the fuck does memory have to do with intelligence? Is a database intelligent? Lmao. Every year supposed "IQ tests" just get more and more of a joke. Ironically people who are actually smart reject pseudoscience like psychology because it is not rigorous enough.
>>16845421Working memory is absolutely related to intelligence or brain power. Your analogy is actually apt. Try running windows 11 on a laptop from 1995. You can't. Just like QFT is completely beyond your brains ability to understand.
>>16845412>any 3fugg
>>16845487I understand QFT easily. Subatomic particles are just excitations in the field. EZ
>>16845494Okay, what's the difference between the first and second quantization? You and I both know you don't know. Copy and pasting AI will be obvious to anyone who knows. Checkmate. Get a better brain before you try to play this game.
>>16845498First quantization is what you do in regular quantum mechanics—you take classical particles with definite positions and momenta and turn those variables into operators acting on wavefunctions. So you’ve got a fixed number of particles, and the wavefunction tells you the probability amplitude for where each one might be.Second quantization (quantum field theory) flips that idea. Instead of treating particles as fundamental, you quantize the field itself. The field becomes an operator that can create or destroy particles. The number of particles isn’t fixed anymore; it can fluctuate because interactions can produce or annihilate them. In that sense, “particles” are just excitations of the underlying field.And yeah, I’m not an AI. If I were, I’d probably say something stilted or try to sound overly polite. I just know how to explain this stuff without hiding behind buzzwords or auto-generated filler.
>>16845503I accept your concession, Mr. GPT
>>16827884I put in the minimum effort and did it in like five minutes
i feel like i got so many wrong. Especially with the memory ones. I know my short term memory is fucked because I've smoked so much weed in my life, I'll probably forget I even took this test a few minutes from now. Also I know I'm an idiot.
>>16845140WHAT THE FUCK DOES THIS MEAN
>Intelligence test>Tests whether you memorized the meaning of obscure words>If anything, that negatively correlates with intelligence
>>168451402, 5, 6
>>16847768Explain why.
>>16845140That's actually very simple and clever: you have to find the 3 that's doesn't have more than x common pixels with the others squares, which are 3, 7, 9
>>16840631These are considered 140 IQ words?
>>16827916Non-English speaker.I took this test a few years ago. I scored ~137 each in memory and in spatial, and just ~110 or maybe even less in verbal.
>>16827884This IQ test is bad for measuring the high range. High range IQ tests are without a time limit and the interactive tests are a more about short term, rote memorization instead of IQ.
>>168451401,4,8
>>16845140since someone has yet to solve this i will gladly proclaim my intellectual supremacy over this thread and this entire board while i'm at itthe solution is, undeniably, 2-9-5no, i will not elaborateunless someone begs nicely enoughthis puzzle is easy as fuck btwverbal is a fake index
>>16845140first box has more red than black, second more black than red, and it alternatesthe rest of the information is noise to trip you up
>>16827884What even is verbal iq
>>16849201>verbal is a fake indexEstimated IQ: 86 (average)
>>16849451solve the puzzle, wordcel
>>16845140Wasting your time analyzing contrived patterns is a low-g trait.
>>16848267>>16849201>>16849216Who is right?
>>16848407fewer
>>16849800less is correct there
>>16849755You know who's right. Clever people don't brag. Also is a solution where counting squares on a 81 dot patterns realistic solve to you?
>>16850056
>>16850079You don't know either, but counting red and black dots doesn't give you the answer, because multiple candidates are valid. So no, this isn't a criteria that allows you to solve the puzzle.
>>16850391a criterion
+ he doesn't know
>>16845494now explain the proof of the unramified geometric langlands conjecture
Whatever
>>16850056Any pattern is possible. More complex ones require more creativity. What's next?{1,2,3,4,...}The traditional answer is 5. I implore you to think about how 0 might be an answer.
>>16850839>More complex ones require more creativity.No, they don't. >I implore you to think about how 0 might be an answer.Because S(i) = i mod 5. Not the answer you had in mind? Too bad, retard. It's a great answer according to your view.
>>16850843
>>16850869What's your meme supposed to indicate? That you're about to engage in a "creative argument" (AKA mental gymanstics)? Either way, they say limitation breeds creativity for a reason, brainlet.
>>16850872solve the puzzle debatecel
>>16843130160 is possible
>>16827884I've done this test before and get between 141 and 145.Not that it matters as I'm an uneducated, unemployed tard with no impulse control, so either iq testing is bullshit and let's morons like me through or iq alone isn't a valuable metric.
>>16843631it's kinda like you're saying caffeine makes you faster lol. You do need enough energy, but I hate the way meth makes people act. I don't even like how I act on caffeine. I try not to but there's a chance I will just say or do something idk too assertive and in the wrong moment that is a murder fr. They've shown that caffeine impairs hippocampus based learning. It puts you on autopilot to some extent which helps you grind out your chores. But there are boosts and real improvements. You should definitely focus on anything that can really improve your iq even just in short term but as high as your iq might be and as fast as you can solve some issues idk I'm a speed freak myself but you should still exercise patience sometimes to get the best result and caffeine will fr work against you
>>16852581High iq people should actually get used but low iq people are too stupid, we should actually all get rounded up and forced to answer questions bc we won't do it ourselves
>>16848390yeah shit is crazy but 140 did sound a little low like no way am I only 140. In the grand scheme of things iq range is more like at least negative 1000 to positive 1000
>>16852511No need to care about the score anymore, need the solutions
>>16852511imagine larping as a 160 iq faggot and not achieve anything lmao
>>16853438I just need to know which six 5's and one 4 he choose for the verbal section. The gap between 155 and 160 is larger than the supermassive blackhole in the center of the galaxy.>>16852611This is how we know your IQ is below 120. The scores stand for statistics: 100 norm 15 SD (unless Stanford Binet w/ 24 SD). Taking a community college Psych 101 course would give you this knowledge. It's not about how "high it sounds" like your local gossip.
>>16853485If you were truly high IQ, you wouldn't need to ask how to get 160
>>16853498Can't ask how to get 3/34 wrong questions on a test right or my IQ is truly low?
>>16853502The negation of "truly high" isn't "truly low," but I suspect you may be right. Also, 34 - 30 = 4.
>>16853507You lose one point for a wrong answer and then miss one point for not getting the correct answer.You can keep masturbating over being a pedant when the meaning was obvious and colloquial. If you want to take the true LOGICAL NEGATION it would be the contrapositive:"You would need to ask how to get 160 if you weren't truly high IQ"Consequently "Truly Low" is within the logical possibilities of "not truly high" and isn't wrong, just not as pedantic as you would want it.
>>16853510>160 then you weren't truly high IQ*
>>16853485You’re dumb as fuck nigga what the fuck happened to this board im the only high Iq person here fml
>>16853510>>16853507Not even not wrong.P -> QP = Truly High IQ Q = No need to ask how to get 160<=>~Q->~P<=> Need to ask how to get 160 IQ -(then)> Not Truly High IQNot Truly High IQ = Truly Low IQ□
>>16853514Nah, retard. I have the objective metrics to prove my intelligence. You're arrogant, conceited, and insulting, all perfect indicators of stupidity. Show your IQ results now.
>>16853510Anon, contraposition is inapposite in this scenario, for the consequent of the quoted implication is evidently false; the negation of the posed antecedent, then, follows rather trivially from an elementary invocation of modus tollens.It's okay, anon. We can't all be 160 IQ. Especially not (You)
>>16853518Contraposition is appropriate wherever logic applies. Did logic stop applying?You really didn't even take Logic 1. Do you know how I know? >the consequent of the quoted implication is evidently false;This is about the structure of things. You just confused validity and soundness. Google those or ChatGPT those like you do.You did a good job searching up ChatGPT for this one (not really) but Modus Tollens is how you get the negated antecedent "Truly Low IQ (You)" as a consequent literally. Then you can use modus ponens with "asked how to get 160". I don't care if my IQ is 155 or 160. I was masters in League, playing Collegiate League, got a perfect SAT score, went to a top 20 school on a full ride, and earn 100k for 1 hour of work a week.I'm not Terrence Tao, too fucking bad. But that's a matter of 60 IQ points not 5
>>16853518You just confused validity and soundness. That summarizes about everything here.
>>16853519My condolences
>>16853515you are one stupid mother fucker, you actually used syntax to explain a retarded proposition that you perpetuated through a shitty question to make it seem like you are some genius lmafooo you are fucking retarded scoring 160 on this test is not impressive its just watching a youtube video nigger faggot ass hoe nigga
>>16853519>This nigga has an IQ of 105 and deluded himself into believing he's a genius because ChadGTP told him so L. M. A. O.Boy, if your IQ was 160, which you believe would mean that all your opinions and thoughts, essentially your entire "status quo" is more noble, true or even 'better 'than the normies', how on Earth do you justify your behaviour on the 4chan scientism board? What do you gain from acting as if you were some genius (you're most likely not; no, unironically studying for an IQ test until you get a good score after 6 iterations isn't genius either, it's pathetic) on an anonymous crypto-creationism forum??
>>16853519you fucking larp nobody is 160 FSIQ stfu bitch
>>16827916the words used in this test that are "high IQ indicators" are literally only found in books from before fucking 1900. you wouldve had to have been an avid reader of said books to score high on the verbal IQ segment of this test.I scored 137 on spatial (I know, I'm a retard) and 103 on verbal, so my results are pretty similar to OP.The problem is that compared to my peers I've definitely been verbally gifted, competing in lots of spelling bees and getting A+s in any College English courses (inb4 college English is for retards; it IS, but my point is that I don't see how my verbal IQ is equivalent to the average when the average would be getting C or B- grades).
>>16853552>>16853804KYS in real lifeYou're not worth breath or air
>>16853552You failed to read a ChatGPT explanation.>>16853572See pic. I'll always have objective stats, accomplishments, and society backing me up.You'll always be a retarded dog barking where no one asked.Stay jealous
>>16854271NTA but it clearly shows only the 99th percentile which would be 135 iq but the SAT is weakly correlated to iq so it regresses to an even lower figure. Not to mention anyone can edit the scores in their browser. Ask chatgpt what intelligence percentile 155 iq is
>>16854369It's 99.98th, the exact percentile of a perfect SAT score.You're a dribbling fool. The SAT has such a high correlation with IQ that IQ societies accept SAT scores.See>>16850829g-Loading 0.93You idiots pretending high IQs don't exist is as stupid as believing tall people or fat people or athletic people don't exist. It's so fucking retarded.>can edit the scores in their browsersMaybe if you have photoshop or CS skills. There are exact raw score-IQ score conversions so it's unlikely they'd put in much effort to make "editing the scores" convincing
>>16854371The old SAT several decades ago did, not the test you took (after 2005 as it's out 2400). It's g-loading is low and the ceiling is definitely under 140 iq. You literally can't get into Mensa using your score because it doesn't even prove 130 iq really
>>16854373Now it's out of 1600. The g-loading is HIGH. https://ouzhang.me/slides/g-loading/G_loading_slides.pdf Interpretation guidelines indicate that g loadings of .70 or highercan be considered strong (Floyd, McGrew, Barry, Rafael, & Rogers,2009; McGrew & Flanagan, 1998)The Old SAT had a near 1:1 correlation with IQ. Now 2006-2016 one has a 0.86 correlation instead of a 0.93 correlation. Oh boo hoo. That's among the highest of all human measures to correlate with IQ, so you're objectively wrong.I scored 145+ on the mensa test too and have the results on my computer somewhere. I always get 99.96th percentile+ on high mental ability activities like League. In my maths major in a top 20 US school I was rank 5-10 for my year. My typing speed is 99.9999th percentile+ but I won't include that.What I don't get is why you low IQ retards argue the same points year after year, just denying the objective truth? Why do you keep denying that 1+1=2 and that g-loading 0.93 out of 1 is a super high fucking statistical value?
>>16854373See>>16843130>Get 155 on IQ test>Retard claims IQ isn't 155According to any ass on the street, the sun is blue, the moon is made of cheese, and Donald Trump is a black man.
>>16854379>like Leaguegr8 b8
>>16854388https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5687598/https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2017/research/multiplayer-video-games/It's just hilarious how everything I say is either backed up with metrics (scores) or research and all you have are opinions.
>>16854379I don't know how you got 800 on math and were "rank 5-10" at a top 20 school but don't get that a loading of 0.7 explains less than 50% of the variance in scores. That is low. Most analyses show the g-loading of the newer SATs is even lower than that btw so your cherrypicking doesn't work. Anyway that's irrelevant because the g-loading only lowers the iq percentile below the test percentile, and the latter itself isn't at the rarity of 155 iq in the first place.The modern SAT is an achievement test and is such a garbage measure of IQ that no high-IQ society accepts it (didn’t you bring this up yourself? lol), not even as proof of 130 iq. And the online Mensa tests have a low g-loading too, didn't you read the image you quoted >>16850829? Fucking retard lol
>>16854396>I don't know how you got 800 on math and were "rank 5-10" at a top 20 school but don't get that a loading of 0.7 explains less than 50% of the variance in scores.Fucking moron. The image is about the GENERAL POPULATION. 0.7 explains 49% of the variance, way to be a fucking newspaper reporter.Here's an image of the 99.9th percentile IQ society accepting 2400 SAT scores. Wow would you look at that? Again you just pull random bullshit from your ass while I have RESEARCH and NUMBERS. LMAOOYou fucking disabled, debilitated abortion failure.If the SAT is an achievement test I still ACHIEVED MORE THAN YOU. Now shut up, sit down, and stop barking, you moronic dog.
>>16854400Then why doesn't Mensa accept it just like this no-name society? Here I'll let you humiliate yourself, scroll down and post the screenshot for all of us: https://www.us.mensa.org/join/testscores/qualifying-test-scores/Also funny that a screenshot of your "first" attempt (at cheating? lmao) shows an unscrambling attempt and a lookup for a 115 iq word, which is where I would put your IQ at actually >>16843130
>>16854403>https://www.us.mensa.org/join/testscores/qualifying-test-scores/SAT taken prior to 9/30/1974taken from 9/30/1974 to 1/31/1994taken after 1/31/1994 13001250MENSA accepts literal SAT scores of 1250 from 1994. Do you realize you can convert OLD SAT scores into new ones?It was a virgin attempt, honestly. I double check after I do things, because that's within fair margins.Post your IQ. Post your IQ now, or this debate is over. You have only criticized others and not proven that you're even above 100 IQ. If it's so easy to craft and fake IQ scores, show us.
>>16854405>you can convert OLD SAT scores into new onesYeah maybe for a short while right after 1994. Is the year that followed 2005? Are you sure you can count buddy? >You have only criticized othersI've proven you're as dumb as the people who need to "double check" the meaning of 115 iq words. The "debate" was over before you thought it started. You’ve spewed enough logical errors and flat out falsehoods that even a midwit would feel second hand embarrassment
>>16854408Post your IQPussy
>>16854408The reason you're here unable to make a single relevant remark is because no logical errors were made by me, meanwhile it takes multiple comments to parse every single sentence that's incorrect on your end. Post your IQ. Post a single accomplishment or test.SATs are the most commonplace object in people's lives that correlate HIGHLY with IQ
>>16854411It IS so easy to get perfect IQ scores on tests you can try as many times as you want >>16852511, and you can't even do that after YEARS. Guess you're sub 100 then huh?>>16854412All I see is that you couldn't even get a perfect score on an achievement test whose max won't even get you into a 130 iq society, and you can't stop seething about it lol
>>16854415So easy? Show us?All I see is that you're low IQ, jealous, and trying to disprove 1+1=2. It's on the pictures. Deal with it.SAT score of 1250 gets into MENSA LMAO What a fucking joke. Post your IQ score, retard.
>>16854417>So easy? Show usYou couldn’t even comprehend the post you just replied, kinda like how you completely missed the very clearly labeled g-loadings of the online Mensa tests in the screenshot you quoted like a retard earlier. People as dumb as you score below 700 on Critical Reading. What gives? Do you make your "100k for one hour of work a week" by scamming people who are even lower IQ than you are? Kinda surprised you can find any
>>16854419You're so fucking dumb it's improbable. You fat sweating retard, post your IQ
>>16854420>improbable1+1=2 is about the only math you've gotten right so maybe put the tardculator down, ok champ? >post your IQGo back and reread my previous posts. Then again, slowly this time. I'm sure with your 800 critical reading ability you'll be able to "glean" the information you seek lol
>>16854426POST YOUR RESULTS
>>16854427Repeating yourself like a tard seems like your thing, but I won't be following suit. And if you're anywhere above 130 IQ, that should be hint enough
>>16854429What? Too scared to pretend you're the 160 poster? Fucking small dicked retard.
>>16854430What is there to pretend? Lol
>>16854431Post your IQ, cunt. Everything from your trolling to your lack of posting own results is obvious.Scared little pussy
>>16854432Shouldn't you be happy you're being proven right with every post you make?>>16853485>The gap between 155 and 160 is larger than the supermassive blackhole in the center of the galaxy.Fucking embarrassing.
>>16854433Not really? It was just playful.Anyways, retard dog, I'm out. You're a waste of time. Drink a shotgun. Do the world a favor, suck the shotgun.
>>16854435Oh so you'd rather have me say that a "155 iq" is being this brutally owned by a sub 100 iq? Quite the humiliation fetish you've got, but hey I don't kink shame.That's right clown you better pack up. Go look up "glean" and "contrapositive" or whatever idiot shit you don't know and go fail that test one more time. Pathetic larping waste of life you are
>>16854438Go find a new forum. You don't belong here. You don't belong anywhere. Take the advice and just kill yourself tonight.
>>16854440You belong in a dumpster, and I'm sure that's where you're tearfully posting from. Because you're larping trash. Human garbage - a picture of you should show up when someone searches its definition lol. And for the record I did get the perfect scores you so desperately, pathetically wish you had. Only clowns would take any advice from you and for obvious reasons (but not so obvious to you eh? so much for 800 critical reading). Cry some more the night is long, especially in your life
>>16854442Just shoot yourself. It's not advice, a sad lonely death turning into a rotting blood puddle is just an inevitability for you.Want to know why? You and I both know how you denied losing every time. You and I both know the truth. You can keep denying your loss on this forum, over and over again, but my response will always be the same: shoot yourself. Kill yourself.We both know deep inside of ourselves why you need to kill yourself.Do you know why you can't get through to me? Some people only accept research, books, and numbers. You don't have any of those, therefore you will never be heard. Just kill yourself. Do it.You can lie to yourself as much as you want here, but your bills, schooling, work, day to day, or rather your lack of employment and lack of education, your dependence on your parents and on the government for wellfare, it doesn't lie.
>>16854445>but my response will always be the sameOf course, because you're a dumb low IQ larper. It's how your kind operate. The monotony of mediocrity is all you've known your whole worthless life lolDoubt anything is getting through that thick skull of yours, but for the last time, modern SAT scores have 0 power to predict high range iqs, not that it matters because clearly all your scores are fake and you aren't even 130 iq. You reek of both inferiority and its associated complex and your desperation is disgusting
>>16854450Nah, my IQ is 155. Your IQ is low. KYS.
>>16827884>124hehExactly the same as in the Mensa test I took years prior Maybe this IQ isn't such bullshit after all
>>16845503>s—ylmao>>16827884also im just a /sci/ lurker, i was an alcoholic and poly-drug abuser for a decade (clean for 2 years, aside from microsoding psychs), i was hoping for at least a 90, this test is bullshit, im dumb
>>16839964>verbal tiltIt's probably those decades of antisemitism
>>16854571you cheated on the memory i scored 109 RAW NIGGA get on my level nigger
>scraped a 2.1 MEng in EE which I realised I hated halfway through>6 years since spent in an fintech consultancy job that I hate, doomscrolling most of the day with zero mental stimulation whatsoeverIs there any hope for me self teaching maths given that I'm close to 30 and beyond rusty?
>>16854396the g loading is more like .6 iirc like the big 5 which is hidden data lmaooin short if you wanna test your iq take big 5 subtract 5 from intellect thats your iq i got 96th percentile raw being honest as fuck
>>16850829you cheated on every iq test congrats i have a 117 icar16 and 110 gai icar60 score and i have discoveries in finance that are proprietary as fuck that i cant share on here so good luck larping forever ig
>>16855850what subjects have you mastered?
Euginic
>>16857860this is my raw
>>16857859The SAT correlates moderately with college grade-point average (GPA) (r ≈ .35, Bridgeman, McCamley-Jenkins, & Ervin, 2000, Table 1, p. 4), and strongly with g (r = .82, Frey & Detterman, 2004; see also, Coyle & Pillow, 2008). g measures variance common to cognitive tests. A test’s g loading (i.e., correlation with g) is directly related to its predictive validity at work and school (e.g., Jensen, 1998, pp. 274–294).
it says i'm smart but i'm actually a useless retarded neet tranny faggot so consider that before you brag ab your iq online or something
>>16858293also im esl but i wanna become a mathematician so it doesn't matter also these numbers are meaningless compared to like some number that'd quantify wherewithal and trait curiosity so i think you're all just woman repellents fapping to numbers desu
>>16858293congrats nigger you wont ever discover shit with your fake ass iq dont larp you are a cool 85
>>16858601the fact you're baseding out so much you feel a primal need to say my number is fake....... none of you know what this number measures. by definition if you're in the iq thread bragging and arguing about your iq you're stupid and there's something wrong with your brain
I prompted Gemini to be as sincere and blunt as possible with the answer of the red/black squares and even it didn’t get a straight answer. If I had to Occam Razor it I would be inclined to believe that the puzzle image is either a trolling attempt or just badly designed. Then again I’m just some stupid ass bloke on the internet so you can dismiss what I said if you want.
>>16827884I'm an esl, this word shit is so annoying
>>16858770shut your bitch ass up you cant even deflect properly lmao fucking retarded shitskin faggot go fuck off and lie on reddit about your iq and get a bunch of autistic faggots to worship your black vagina ass
>>16827884verbal section was brutal, only way to get vocab one would be if ur a book reading nerd
>>16827884I'm ESL so the Verbal test was doomed to be shit, and my memory is crap for instant memorization.However I can remember such massive amounts of worldbuilding shit for my novels, that make these little shit tests kneel and cry.
Hi, my IQ results
>>16827884I would never willingly take one of these things
>>16827884
>>16854379>on high mental ability activities like Leagueyour bait fell apart on this one kek. i hit grandmaster in euw three years ago playing on 90 ms ping and a very shit laptop where i averaged 45 fps with continous stuttering and I'm objectively as average as it gets intelligence wise.
>>16860936Proof? One single example destroys peer reviewed statistical evidence (Le KeK)Yes, that's how it works.Post IQ + Summoner tag. All season info stays intact
>>16861170>N = 1 overpowers effect sizes observed in large NRetard alert. Never visit this board again.
>>16861184POST IQ + SUMMONER TAGYou're just as retarded as you sound. You proved my point. n=1 does nothing to n=1000. It's called correlation retard, it's the definition ofCORRELATION
>>16849600>refuses to be contained in the box
>>16855850>hope, doomscrollingIt takes 10,000 hours of practice to git gud at something. Does your doomscrolling ever take you through maths vloggers? If so, some of those hours might count towards maths.>MEng, fintech, hated, hateThose are very different kinds of maths. You may prefer certain kinds of maths over others.[math]\begin{align*}f(x) &:= \text{type of maths vlogger}\\f(\text{3Blue1Brown})&=\text{pure//abstract math}\\f(\text{Veritasium})&=\text{applied math//science}\\f(\text{SmarterEveryDay})&=\text{practical//normie engineering}\\f(\text{styropyro})&=\text{experimental//mad-scientist engineering}\end{align*}[/math]
>>16830175I got 132 and I'm uneducated and only ever stocked shelves
I'mma be honest, my memory sucks and also I got bored halfway through and just sorta speedran the spacial section based on vibes.
>Full Scale IQ: 121>Memory IQ: 128>Verbal IQ: 122>Spatial IQ: 119It's over.
>>16843130All that intelligence but can't crop a screenshot
Breddy gud shape rotating for an aphantastic visuallet
>>16827884congrats fucking liar im 110 FSIQ and i dont lie im a jesus reincarnation nigger
IQ threads on 4chan full of people pretending to be whatever they think "smart" is are my favorite. Top tier entertainment every fucking time. The fact that some insecure retard in this one posted a literal dick measuring pic before devolving into "kys lol" over quiz results with another retard is so on-the-nose it's some form of poetry.
>>16867814kys lol
my bad memory fucks up my iq test results :(>>16828277half of the mensa test is basically "do you know what xor is?"
