is 1 the most truly undefined form? for all the states of number there are?Thee snake of our boot?
>>16828043>is 1 the most truly undefined formI written pages upon pages one the definition of the number 1, directly connecting it from Pure Mathematics to Genetics, Cognition and Psychology, to Atomic Topology and SpaceTime.Huemans cant do 1+1= without being able to concretely define 1.
present them queries or fite me snake
https://youtu.be/KzD-QF62OmkExactly, now lets contemplate ways to prove 1+1 equals anything except 2.
1 has many definitions.You can have a banana or an apple per se.
Better than those tongue twisted on the matter making a stutter of speech to 'imagine' 1
>>16828546>>16828512>>16828508Cult of Passion postan ITT
>>16828553>to 'imagine' 1One is easy enough to grasp, but nature counts in different base systems and "the 1" is a probabilistic (or induced) entity with stable poles below agregated. You can call anything a [completed unit], even concepts. Monkeys even grasp basic uneven/even and numeration.Cognition directly connected to a single atom, its possible to go prior as purely Maths though.(This is why I know what snakes cant ssseee.)
>>16828562You academia dumb
>>16828562You wouldn't know the expansive nature of 1.
>arguing with Cult of Passion(troll)I know I shouldn't do it. And won't again.
>>16828043>is 1 the most truly undefined form?Zero
>>16828568>the expansive nature of 1And the compacting finitude of 0. It is not null in reality...it is policy and law.Taking a "unit measure", but from what?
>>16828584>Zero[LOUDEST HISS POSSIBLE]Im slow because Im busy doing Sith council things.>>16828567>You academia dumbFunny...I skipped/expelled/dropped out well over half of middle and high school. Polar opposite of academia.Youre so inside the matrix you see outside as inside...youre a nasty little monster, arnt ya?
>>16828590Chill man, I'm just grabbin' some nuts.(Your brain).
>>16828590>nastyYou're the one who toddled in here and left a stinker of academic infused stupidity for us all to understand
>>16828596>academic infused stupidityWhich field are you peer reviewing from? Without this ctitcal piece of information I cannot assist you further.
>>16828601It's not a review, it's solid proof. Anything academic is dumb apart from collections of natural data.
>>16828604>it's solid proofThats what the academics said! You and them are on the same side!>apart from collections of natural data.Ah, yes, false bridge science.The "demon core" makes warmth...if youre not measuring for radiation you would know it was there. What is being measured comes before the numbers. You dont even "know thy enemy", doth thee know thyself?Unfortunately you are a "little shit", and need a mild thrashing. The one you dad failed to give.
>>16828607You have 0 intelligence lol, as well as 99.99999999999% of humanity.
>>16828610>99.99999999999>number so small the "1" is a hypothetical>>16828562>"the 1" is a probabilistic (or induced) entity>You have 0 intelligenceYou should mature and culture yourself about the world.https://youtu.be/KtCb0Mah1T4
>>16828618Shut up you over chaotic nonce. I know this is a simulation and you're an NPC with no guilt for it's crimes sent here to pester me. Remember that.
>>16828628>chaotic nonceYou interpret reality fucked up...like someone yelling at a dam to free the water while downstream of it. You have no frame of reference.I just left Kabul after my meeting with the Caliphate royal court, made an adjustment geopolitically, and am now resting in Chiang Mai chiefing it up. https://youtu.be/ZzCSBFyeBcg
