[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Wikipedia_FREE_SPEECH.jpg (28 KB, 609x328)
28 KB
28 KB JPG
Hi all, I wondering why wikipedia doesn't let me make a correction even thought I've included reliable facts. The thing is, I know this man, who, to future true Catholics (according to the party's view), doesn't write about his marital status. And for some reason, as a passer-by, they won't let me fill his dossier with magnificient stories about his relatives about his exploits besides developments at Microsoft.

https://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonas_Skendelis
>>
>>16828733
>why wikipedia doesn't let me make a correction
Wikimedia Foundation does not recognize l*thuanians as human beings, and therefore cannot endow them with the right to have their article edits accepted.

I see no flaw in Wikimedia's approach, at least in this part. They could do better by recognizing the p*lish as equally subhuman tho.
>>
Did you ask nicely to their staff?
>>
>>16828741
Ok, so tell me, how do they create the given page?
>>
>>16828742
Give me a link
>>
>>16828746
>Ok, so tell me, how do they create the given page?
Without involving any l*thuanians?
>>
>>16828752
In general
>>
>>16828733
It's a few boomers who never had any academic achievements so they squat there and also use bots to protect their wikipedia editing achievements. A few years ago (maybe more now, I don't remember) I started to get autoreverted by bots. Not even anything controversial, just correcting for example the spelling of a TV character's name that was spelled correctly in another article. Or fixing a single digit typo from an obscure math paper. Then if I persisted in making the correction, a sociopathic boomer would eventually emerge and throw a tantrum like a baby. I no longer bother helping the wikipedia project. Maybe it'll get better when these boomers finally die or get stuffed into nursing homes.
>>
>>16828747
Did your edit fail to submit or being reverted?
>>
>>16828772
Not appeared
>>
>>
>>16828733
this sounds like self research. wikipedia is not a primary source, if you want to publish novel information do so in a newspaper or in a magazine
>>
File: history.jpg (320 KB, 1844x958)
320 KB
320 KB JPG
>>16828773
Click on the View History link to see what happened to your submission.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.