i think that IQ estimations past 125 and below 75 is unreliable and IQ estimations past 130 and below 70 are complete bullshit. any objections?
>>16831039Very low IQ results are in fact quite useful. IQs above 130 are essentially just "yeah this person is pretty smart",
I'm slightly skeptical of iq scores as a measure of intellect for a few different reasons, though I do indeed view anything past 130 as simply "smart" and anything below 70 as "dumb". People who worship them need to get a life.
>>16831039>IQ estimationBruh. Iqtards try really hard to pretend to be scientists don't they.
>>16831043Once got into an argument with a biodetermafag over the influence of socioeconomic factors and he showed me evidence that the iq score of 93 given to the Chinese during Mao's reign was invalid because the test was biased against them. Made me lol.
>>16831039IDK about complete bullshit, I feel like there will be a noticeable difference between someone who scrapes in 130-140 and someone who consistently gets 150+ on every test, but I agree the specific number isn't really accurate or worth focusing on.
>>16831039you strike me as a 105-110 guy
>>16831039No objection.