> According to the theoretical physicist and author Carlo Rovelli, there is no such thing as objective reality — only perspectiveshttps://www.quantamagazine.org/carlo-rovellis-radical-perspective-on-reality-20251029/I don't think that you can build a philosophy upon the quantum measurement problem.
if you knew anything you would know that this isn't a particularly rare opinion in philosophy
>>16831222So then everything that we're told to believe about objective reality is just forced imposition. Cool.
>>16831217>no such thing as objective realitySo I'm free to say that Mr. Rovelli is not real and never made such a statement.
>>16831217Ultimately, the STEMcuck bows to the HumanitiesChad, and his conclusions must support the post war consensus that everything is relative and subjective to avoid another Hitler. In every age it’s been so. Newton for gods ordered universe. The myopic ethnocentric math of the Greeks for Athens. STEM must always kneel.
why does it take you to 70yo to realize this?better late than neveryou can say "this is a list of things in the world and this is how they are" but it isn't perception, it's creation.anything can be true, except that which breaches metaphysical law,and even then, you can deny that e.g. materialism.False theories are a valid mechanic to enforce limitation, a "veil"
>>16831499Hegel and Bishop Berkeley came after the war? This is your brain on retardation
the view that reality is real leads to a lot more harm and suffering than subjectivity.in subjectivity, you see others as yourself and thus have more empathy.but in brutal objectivity there is strong self-other separation, judgment, hate, competition etc.so "muh evil" comes directly from objectivity.
>>16831217>REEEE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS OBJECTIVE REALITY>EXCEPT FOR ME WHEN I TELL YOU MY OPINIONS!!!! WHEN I HAVE AN OPINION THATS FACT!!!>ANYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME ISN'T CAPABLE OF BEING OBJECTIVEwhy are soiyence faggots all so gay and retarded
>>16831217This has been known since quantum mechanics for the last 100 years or so. More so, it has been known since general relativity's understanding of time. When he says "only perspective", given his natural expertise on physics as it relates to time, thats what his core understanding comes from. The "objective reality" is a god's eye view of the world "as is" but there's no god's view in physics. There's only measurements (perspective) we do from one particle to another.
