[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1748102411671874.gif (992 KB, 498x280)
992 KB
992 KB GIF
>everything that exists, consist of information
>information is just series of bits, true or false
>any information is meaningless without an interpreter
What is the interpreter? There has to be _something_ that interprets something else, information by itself is static, it does not do or mean anything, it can contain an interpreter in any form but such interpreter would be static too. Therefore I conclude a duality: reality consists of an interpreter acting on raw information. What is the interpreter?
>>
File: 1737487607254909.jpg (46 KB, 474x311)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
We exist within a stable subset of an infinity, for reason that is unknown. I can only assume that this infinity of information contains the information for my continuous conscious experience itself and that somehow the fact that this information IS, is enough for me to experience it.
>>
>can only think in binary
these are clearly digital and abstract traits
>>
File: __________________.png (122 KB, 298x244)
122 KB
122 KB PNG
>>16834153
We are ontologically biased. A logical-conceptual reductionism will always lead you to PRIMITIVES with a strong dependence on faith. Therefore, I have come to the conclusion that there exists something called ANTI-LOGIC, which can 'explain' existence without origin, something we cannot access due to the aforementioned bias. [ Is this ANTI-LOGIC blind 'faith'? A kind of instinct —or interpreter, using your terms— at a meta level? ].

If you seek truth, you must escape the atomism of specialization and cultivate a holistic approach. I would suggest beginning with music, where your intuition of oscillations is most alive. And where ANTI-LOGIC [as sensation and time] can be experienced more tangibly.

CONSCIOUS_FLESH is the stable permutation arising from the oscillation between FATHER [objectivity, space, mathematics, macro, constant], and MOTHER [subjectivity, time, sensation, micro, delta].

The current scientific paradigm appeals to our FATHER, while art appeals to our MOTHER.

As long as we fail to achieve a synergy of approaches, our ontological evolution will remain stunted.
>>
>>16834153
>What is the interpreter?
We are the interpreter, man is the subject who cognizes the world around him, simple as. That's a psychological fact that the world (and the information contained in it) exists not only as it is, but also as how one sees it. This fact opens a great prospect for each subject to formulate the same thing in a fresh new way and open to others a deeper insight into how one can view reality, but it also leads to high arbitrarity and problems of communication, but that's a different topic.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.