[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


What if quantum fluctuations are just compression artifacts of the simulator?
What if quantization itself is just the sim’s resolution limit?
If we really lived in a simulation, why would the dev waste so much memory on an infinite universe we’ll never see, instead of just making a smaller one with enough RAM left for deterministic physics at the microscopic level?
>>
>>16835179
It could be. Would be hard to test those things without knowing about whatever the simulation is running on. Maybe the quantum effects are intentional to obscure the details.
>>
>>16835179
quantum fluctuations are not real. QFT doesnt predict any fluctuations, its just a tool to calculate particle interactions.
>>
>>16835179
they’re aether noise
>>
>>16835179

is cosmic ray hitting a spot
>>
>>16835179
there is no simulator
>>
>>16835179
quantum fluctuations are just interactions we can't measure in a high enough resolution to determine what they are, we can only go so far
>>
>>16837609
Quantum fluctuations are neither predictions of a theory nor measurable objects. They are nothing.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.