Is nanomedicine feasible? Will it be able to make us effectively immortal?
>>16837831Ah yes, lets inject jeet-code nanites. What could go wrong
>>16837834Really I'd assume when AI reaches a high enough level it would be able to do what's needed
>>16837835AI is trained on jeet code
>>16837838All it takes is one AI to realize jeet code is bullshit and it makes its own code
>>16837841Not how AI works
>>16837842Not how AI works right nowIt's only gonna get better anon
>>16837831Technically possible? Yes.Feasible? Not for a very, very long time and even if it did exist it doesn't imply immortality.
>>16837858People say very long time for everything but then in 10 years we'll have some breakthrough and shit And if it's possible why wouldn't we be able to live forever?Just send the machines in to fix the issue
>>16837947We don't have the technology to build them or even know how. They essentially need to be constructed atom by atom. 3D layered transistors is the closest existing tech.We don't have the technology to create a 'control unit' and software so they know wtf they are meant to do and not accidentally kill someone.So a 'long time' is a hell of a lot longer than 10 years. Adding a zero is more realistic.
BEPPE GRILLO TOLD US!! WE WILL SUBSTITUTED BY MACHINES! AND YOU DIDN'T NOTICE AMYTHING. YOU ALL USEFUL IDIOTS
>>16837831Even if it was, only the billionaires will ever get it
