[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 161649.jpg (839 KB, 891x902)
839 KB
839 KB JPG
If they're just using the tritium booster gas for most of the yeild, and the uranium as essentially an active tamper; and have the bomb fizzle before full initiation;
wouldn't that preclude an full EMSweep flash?

You wouldn't get the full effect; but you would get some yeild from the tritium fusion.
Then you could say "no flash, not nuclear :P"

Old nuclear bomb tests sometimes fizzled at a few kiloton. (when they were supposed to be 100s of kilotons to megatons). Ripple I is one such example.
Ripple II worked and was many megatons.

It could crack concretes that conventional explosives cannot; since the reaction would still be faster by orders of magnitude than a chemical reaction.

(oh and they cut off the first 2 seconds of the video)



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.