[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: media_G3ldSTUXAAAAQwc.jpg (87 KB, 661x680)
87 KB
87 KB JPG
Is plutonium no good for this, or is it that plutonium is non-denyable; but you can just say the uranium was part of the penetrator :P.

I know you can't use plutonium in a guntype because it pre-initiates too quickly and disassembles itself before full initiation resulting in a fizzle.
>>
>>16838385
Every isotope is somewhat unique, but it mostly comes down to availability. U235 is the easiest due to being able to centrifuge it from natural uranium ore at a 0.7% ratio. Uranium ore is relatively safe, relatively nonreacitve, and not much of a radiation hazard.

Plutonium is refined from the transmutation products in a fission reactor. These transmutation and daughter products are highly radioactive and often chemically toxic. Very hazardous to process.
>>
Also half life too. It doesn't make sense to make a nuclear bomb with a short half life unless you intend to detonate it immediately.

Nuclear deterrence bombs need decades of storage life.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.