Why is this considered a "scientific scandal"?Shouldn't a completely untested medication be expected to have some undesirable, unpredicted side effects? Thats why they normally test medications before giving them to the general public
this will go nowhere because given the timing (vaxing in the midst of a pandemic) they will always be able to say all negative downstream effects were strictly the result of covid itself
>shit quality capture, probably a capture of a capture posted on pol>no link>no doi>a literal schizoI've defecated more trust-some things that him.
>>16838953>Shouldn't a completely untested medication be expected to have some undesirable, unpredicted side effects?This is a scandalous and anti-scientific position in 2025.
>get vax'd >diemaybe you were the disease they were trying to eliminate
scientists discovered the vax cures bad luck and gets you to heaven and opens your turd eye
>https://brownstone.org/Ah yes, this looks like a completely truthful and unbiased source.
>>16840112vaxcuck mad. Sad!
2 more weeks.
>>16838953Doctors were baffled
>this is might beReally?
>>16838964OP is an untrustworthy ass-bandit.
