>results are all astronomy relatedapologize /sci/
>>16839426I've never seen a black dwarf
>>16839428me either so i thought maybe they all just die young but i can't readily find this practical information because of countless nonsense articles pandering to /sci/ nerds about dead stars that might theoretically exist a quadrillion years from now assuming heat death of the universe is valid but won't matter anyway even if it is because nobody will never ever see one
>>16839450>searching for "African dwarf" just returns results about African dwarf frogsMaybe black dwarves just aren't real
>>16839428here's a rare binary system
have you guys tried "nigger dwarf"?
>>16839464I geg'd
>>16839588I won't type the N word or the M word even if it would help in this circumstance. That wouldn't be a problem if it weren't for you geeks.
