If 2D creature sees a 3D object interacting with 2d space like this(ie. Bounded by his plane of existence) but it doesn't makes the object 2D. Using same logic, If a being from higher plane of existence/dimension interacts with our 3D world,we'll also see him being bounded by our dimension/plane of existence (ie. Death,birth, time and space) but it doesn't means he is a 3D being. Could this be why when higher beings/God(eg. Jesus, krishna etc) interacts with humans beings he takes birth and then dies? It could also be reason why we don't we see God as his real form because then he'll be bounded by our limits. We would a able to see him as a person, kill him, or just talk to him.
>>16849255You are so close to the truth yet so far…
>>16849284Care to explain?
>>16849255I don't think anything other than 3 special dimensions can exist. We are 3d, but we see in 2d. A flatlander sees in 1d, and a 4d being would see in 3d.Seeing in 3d would mean you see all sides of an object simultaneously. Genuinely what the fuck does that even mean, it makes no sense, it's physically impossible. Same with seeing in 1d. You can't actually visualize this, the closest is seeing in 2d with constant vertical coloring like a bar code, but that's still 2d. The concept of zero thickness makes no physical sense.And you might say just because you can't visualize it, doesn't mean it can't exist. But what would it actually mean for their to be 4d space. And I'm not talking about spacetime, where time is a dimension but clearly treated differently, I mean full blown 4d space. Like how a flatlander would see a square as a line, we see a cub as a square (straight on, or a collection of quadrilaterals from angles). A 4d being would look at a 3d cube they way we look at a square, and see the entirety of it at the same time. And to me, that is physically impossible
>>16849405" A 4d being would look at a 3d cube they way we look at a square, and see the entirety of it at the same time. And to me, that is physically impossible"Yeah it will be physically impossible... Physically impossible for you to comprehend. Because you are You are trying to understand 4D as a 3D n ¡ g g a
>>168494054d space could exist i suppose. I reckon it doesn't though, not because of its weirdness but because 2d space and 1d space don't exist so why would 4d exist
>>16849405>>Seeing in 3d would mean you see all sides of an object simultaneously. Genuinely what the fuck does that even mean, it makes no sense, it's physically impossible.A 4D being would need a 3D retina to see in 3D obviously. Just shoot light from the 4th dimension onto a 3D object and it will hit every atom in that object and get reflected back into the 4th dimension where it eventually hits every point in the retina of the 4D being
>>16849516Uh oh anon. Atoms cannot exist in 4d
