[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: download.jpg (16 KB, 300x168)
16 KB
16 KB JPG
i also feel like it's a trick. There is no way something moves faster than x2 ground wind, without proper human skill and intervention. every advantage could turn into a disadvantage very fast. timing and alignment play a huge role, just like in a sail boat. The opposing forces are also at play, just like two cars don't collide at 25 each, but at 50 combined. With a thin frame vehicle, to go 40 at a 25 of wind gush is just a skill issue. You cannot however be faster than 50, i think (unless the wind reflects on the ground, giving it an aviation rotation movement???). Also, Veritasium should have use a level in their test.
Cyclists also know that when pedaling against wind. It feels like more effort is required. They should have theoretically calculated twice the speed of wind, so it wouldn't sound like a cookoo free energy gimmick. A plastic bag or a rock could beat this thing, given the alignment of the vehicle or the force of wind.
I would like to know if i am wrong.
>>
wtf...
is there a youtube video i'm supposed to watch to understand this OP?
>>
>>16850029
No and it's not worth reading the long post of his. He's probably just butt hurt over being wrong
>>
>>16850029
well... yes. sorry for the lack of link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCsgoLc_fzI
Thanks!
>>
>>16850027
>would like to know if i am wrong.
Yes.
>>
>>16850032
elaborate
>>
>>16850030
>probably
you are Probably just shit posting
>>
>>16850030
Should have known 4chan is brainrot, not critical thinking. Thaks!
>>
>>16850027
I love pussy
>>
>>16850293
Last post best post
>>
>>16850031
np, ty for link
hope the thread goes well...
>>16850030
hmmm...



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.