le science changed again...........https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/archaeology/a69445731/ancient-boats-found-southeast-asia-timeline/
>>16854588Oopsies. New seltlled sciences just dropped
>>16854588As were to be expected. Now we wait for the next change.
>>16854600yes. the cycle happens from 10 to 10 years on average
Science is co-opted by fiction writers. Its not science's fault at all.
>>16854605how long is tenure?
>>16854588>theories are falsifiable in science>and so, scientists come up with new theories based on new evidenceWOW, who would have thought?
>>16854614>Science is co-opted by fiction writers. Its not science's fault at all.This. Right now, the physicists are trying to find a way to pretend there is a "multiverse" because they saw it in a Marvel movie.>>16854635>It doesn't matter that they always turn out to be wrong! They're still right!!!
>>16854588The Antikythera mechanism on its own should be enough to give people some pause on the confidence of the current archaeological timeline.>>16854614Yeah, yeah. It's never "science's" fault even though "science" endlessly goes along with this junk in order to secure funding. It's a double edge sword and "science" wants to be immune to the downsides of using fiction to promote itself. Same with political bullshit they're always wrapping themselves in and later trying "teeheehee, that wasn't us, we never said that, it was the media" to get out of responsibility for claim they didn't refute because it was advantageous to them for the public to be mislead.
>>16854588science btfo AGAINwhy do they even bother anymore?
ali, chang, igor or pajeet? and why? seems to be a waste of time and resources.
>>16854588That is nothing, there are human ruins in the Moon and Mars. Modern human anatomy is 100K years olds. The best raw resources were already depleted several thousands of years ago.
>>16854588>le science changed again...........>https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/archaeology/a69445731/ancient-boats-found-southeast-asia-timeline/>Here’s what you’ll learn when you read this story:>Stone tool analysis of sites in Southeast Asia provided evidence that the area was a technological leader in seafaring.>Archaeology supports that 40,000 years ago, the people living in Southeast Asia were well-versed in boatbuilding and open-sea fishing.>This research puts Southeast Asia ahead of Europe and Africa in technological process.uh, okay. interesting i guess
>thread about how "science" changed>article about history
>>16854588>ancient tools found>>16855434>actually it's just boats
>>16854588Yeah I came from turtle town down round’ man, nearly got shot in a shootout, also who is Eve?
>>16854646>>It doesn't matter that they always turn out to be wrong! They're still right!!!This isn't some massive paradigm shift. It's a slight adjustment in what is a largely unchanged overall narrative.Like if we discovered tomorrow that some random ass frog in spme backwater shithole has slightly different dietary patterns than previously believed, would you scream "le science btfo!!!" again?Existing models allow for and accommodate variation on what we aren't particularly certain about.
>>16855446>>It doesn't matter that they always turn out to be wrong! They're still right!!!Clownworld, but it's media BS not science. They found some plant remains on stone tools and that made a pacific wide seafarer culture out of it. Same as you find some weed remains and your conclusion is that the smoker is able to make the tows holding an container ship as evidence the potheads are able to build 2000 TEU ships. Because hemp is another product of the plant.
>>16854600>>16854605>>16854635you lost trannies
>>16855443>actually it's just boatsAny primitive population was able to build at least a crude shelter, so they could build at least a raft too.Something close to a boat isn't that far.I'd be more suprised if no one did it.
>>16855458>you lostquite the contrary, we seem to have found something new!
>>16854588This is why i went back to bible study.
>>16854588No, science did not change, our knowledge changed and we adapted it, science is still the same.
>science is supposed to never changeReligious retards projecting their delusions jesus. Science is about discovery and adjusting your theories to newly found facts.
>>16854588
>>16855705Nope. Hancock's still a retard.
>>16855712Sour grapes.
>>16855735You either don't know what that means or the connection you're making is spurious.
>>16854676>The Antikythera mechanism on its own should be enough to give people some pause on the confidence of the current archaeological timeline.No where near enough.
>>16855740>spuriousWhy did you use AI in your reply? Dumbass. Read Aesop's fables for an explanation of sour grapes.
>>16855744All kinds of engineering were vastly underdocumented in the written and archeological record sadly. We have nothing but a few written clues about training of architechts and civil engineers in Rome, yet they produced 1800s era tech in many respects. As an example.
>>16855749I know where sour grapes comes from and what it usually means, moron. It's the cope where you tell yourself that the thing you can't have isn't worth having.What does that have to do with me calling Hancock a retard?
>>16855757You're a doubter who was proven wrong and now you still act high and mighty.
>>16855760Proven wrong about what?And I still don't see the connection with sour grapes.
>>16855446>This isn't some massive paradigm shift.Tell me which "science facts" you believe won't ever change so I can laugh at you and humiliate you in front of everyone else here.You will live to see a time when scientists literally say they can no longer define what a woman is.I'm not making this up. That will literally happen. It's impossibly, retardedly stupid, but it will happen.Oh wait, it already did.
>>16854588>archaeology is scienceSciences have data.Archaeology has a sliver of flint and voluminous fan fiction.
>>16857126>Tell me which "science facts" you believe won't ever changeLaw of superposition is a good start. Let me know if you want me to throw more obvious examples at you.>scientists literally say they can no longer define what a woman is.Conflation. Psychologists being faggots and using their own pet "definitions" for things does not reflect a change in our understanding of the underlying biological reality those definitions are loosely based upon.Biologists have firm definitions for "male" and "female."
>>16855712no u
>>16855436Stop strawmanning, the science is settled now.
>>16854588Ancient Native Americans used boats to get to the Western Hemisphere 20,000+ years ago. Asians boat maxing not a surprise.
>>16855712He isn't a retard. He is intelligence asset.
