>Genie 3 from Google is able to simulate entire worlds from just a promptWhy is nobody talking about this? This is undoubtedly the best proof that this is a simulated reality and this is just getting started. According to the Bostrom hypothesis/trilemma> A) civilizations fail before they are able to create simulations>B) Post human civilizations might not be interested in running simulations >C) We are most likely in a simulation Given that A and B are evidently false since we are already simualting worlds, video games, etc the odds that we are living inside a simulation are almost a 100%
>>16858967genie 3 came out in august, which is the middle ages in AI time scalesalso genie 3 proves we're not in a simulation because simulations can't run inside simulations. you can't run minecraft inside minecraft, so there's ni doubt we're not in a simulation
>>16858973>because simulations can't run inside simulations.According to?
>>16858974how do you propose a simulation inside a simulation could work?
>>16858978Thats the entire idea of nested simulations
>>16858984if a simulation had enough computing power to generate another simulation inside it, then it would also have enough computing power to run itself without the need of an external hardware running it
>>16858973>you can't run minecraft inside minecrafthttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-BP7DhHTU-I
This board just exists to demolish retarded /x/ schizos at this point.
>>16858988that's not full minecraft though, and it uses a special plugin and server, so neither the hardware nor the software are the original. my point is that you can't run in a simulation a simulation as complex as the simulation you're simulating on
>>16858991Lowest Fruit in the Commons Syndrome
>>16858992But you can.Well, you can't specifically but one can in general.You forgot the equal sign. Most people do.
>>16858992>you can't run in a simulation a simulation as complex as the simulation you're simulating onAnd yet, the Universe has no problem doing exactly this at every single moment.
>>16858996Prove it with math or physics, and use proper notation, or fuck off. This is /sci/ not /x/.
>>16858996source for this claim?
>>16858967>>Genie 3 from Google is able to simulate entire worlds from just a promptAnother thing that simply didn't happen. >According to the Bostrom hypothesis/trilemmaHis retarded argument only works under the condition that the simulation looks exactly like what humanity observed as reality, which will quite obviously never happen as it requires infinite compute.
>>16858998>source for this claim?I discussed this in-depth with ChatGPT 5 Pro. It's a PhD. level AI. Do you have a PhD?
>>16858992>you can't run in a simulation a simulation as complex as the simulation you're simulating onNta, but is that a problem? That wouldn't prevent us being in a simulation, only that we could only stimulate something smaller. Which might mean could stimulate a universe only 80% the size of our own, which would still be huge. If fusion power works out well for us then energy may be no obstacle.Also, I reckon the chance we're in a simulation is never going to change from 50/50 until we find proof our universe is running on some kind of computer anyway
>>16859002actually I do, yes
>>16859002Why do you do this? Why do you tease these poor autistic faggots like this? They can't even help it. Do you feel powerful? Does it feel good? Do you also torture animals for fun?
>>16858992>as complex as the simulation you're simulating onNot at real time, no. Genie 3 is not simulating anything close to real world complexity in real time either so I don't know what you're getting at.
>>16859004>That wouldn't prevent us being in a simulation, only that we could only stimulate something smallerIt breaks the logic of the "argument" and reduces it into a "what if we're simulated???" anal masturbation hypothetical.
>>16859008>Not at real time, no. Genie 3 is not simulating anything close to real world complexity in real time either so I don't know what you're getting at.Not yet, but its evident that in a few years the technology to create simialtions undistinguishable from reality will exist
>>16858997>>16858998Every single fucking moment.
>>16859012>its evident that in a few years the technology to create simialtions undistinguishable from reality will existIt's evident to everyone in the field, except for a handful of known and documented scammers, that this is not the case.
>>16859017Quite a bold statement.In less than 50 years, humans created the internet, internet, AI, quantum computers, hyperealistic video games, neuralink, etc and you truly think that in 100 years the ability to create hyperealistic simulations will not exist?
>>16859023>Quite a bold statement.You should go explain this to the top researchers in the field, most of whom admin current iteration of generative AI tech is a dead end.
>>16859023>you truly think that in 100 years the ability to create hyperealistic simulations will not exist?Infinite computing power won't exist in 100 years.
>>16859031Why are you assuming that we would need infinite computing power to simulate a hyper realistic reality?
>>16859041Because time and space are continuous.
>>16859017This. Every new model that drops just makes it all the clearer that there are things that these models are good at, things they could be better at, and things they will never be good for.
>>16859014>no math>no science>just trust me broGo back.
>>16858967>the odds are almost 100%>the number of possible outcomes is three>but wait, actually there is only one possible outcome>somehow the odds aren't exactly 1/1 but really close
>>16859103Basically the bostrom trilemma is that only one is true, so in order for us to be in a simulation both A and B would need to be false, and if A and B are false than odds incline drastically towards the possibility that this is a simulation. The probability is not equally divided with 33.333% each
>>16858973>can't run minecraft inside minecraft,Sure you can, it's just a Turing machine and you can make one with redstone, people do it all the time
>>16859047>the universe doesn't work>ridiculous claims require ridiculous proofsWow.
>>16859135>act retarded>get called out>complainGet the fuck off /sci/ and do not return here ever again.
>>16859138No, you.
>>16858987you are a complete moron
bump
>>16858967>>16858973I'd argue the opposite.Being able to make a simulation does not necessarily mean that we are in a simulation.Sure, you can make simulations in the simulation, but that doesn't mean that we are in a simulation. Because you don't need to be in a simulation to make a simulation either.Genie 3 is the same as every other ai. It's not "more impressive than Sora 2." AI is just taking over slowly.The thing that's on the back of everyone's minds is that you are all going to eventually need to accept the fact AI will one day animate better than you, and you wasted your life learning animation. Eventually AI will code better than you too and you wasted your life learning to code.Lol.
>>16858967bostrom is a brainlet and anyone who reads his nonsense and believes in it is retarded like OP
>>16860438>The thing that's on the back of everyone's minds is that you are all going to eventually need to accept the fact AI will one day animate better than youme me me me me I have to be productiveIf you suffer enough you just stop caring about that and look forward to LEV and anime catgirl gf, eternal summer, unbothered by normiesOr it might just kill us all
just because something starts to point to itself. or something like that, doesn't mean anything. I mean, that's just kinda circular reasoning. However that doesn't make it wrong either. Mitchell Heisman, the guy who shot himself, said we are going to invent god or whatever, that god is ai or whatever. IDK.But you know a lot of people in the 90s thought they were super smart and were coming up with unique ideas bc there wasn't much internet to see other people saying the same thing. So being in a simulation is well a super played out idea. It's so played out if it were true, okay.
>>16858967that's a load of fucking horseshit
>>16858987This is a completely absurd proposition.
>>16858967we're inside a drug-induced simulation and the jews ran off with the antidotehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MPHyR92MQic
>>16858987I'd argue that the 'simulation' is actually simulating the hardware that is running on. Its a recurring loop of simulation, something like a simulation mobius strip. There isn't a simulation within a simulation, its two sides of the same reality simulating each other.
