https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/epidemiology/articles/10.3389/fepid.2025.1592629/full
>>16864096confirmation bias I know butI FUCKING KNEW IT
>>16864129https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7oq6UmA9EY
>>16864096>passed peer reviewCOVIDbros... I'm not feeling so good...
>>16864286I mean this was speculated from the beginning. Btw some people made BANK from those tests.
Is it true Reiner Fulmich is in prison?
>>16864442Those tests were literally made in 2019 in huge amounts.purely a coincidence that covid happened
>>16864444I think he was sentenced to 3 years in spring of 2025. >>16864446I wouldn't be surprised.
>>16864096lol scientists are such retards
>>16864096>the coof was LITERALLY just the last anti-trump hoax they pulled during his first term Just as we said back then. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
>>16864462I think this would have happened anyway but they might have deployed it earlier than planned because of him.
>>16864455Some of them are afraid.
>>16864096can someone explain to me how research is so far behind schizos? It is like 4 years. Is Scott Adams really right when he said the antivaxxers are actually just that fucking lucky?
>>16864702>can someone explain to me how research is so far behind schizos?What do you mean?
>>16864702its not even luck, anyone could just google mrna vaccines and see theyve never worked before, and along side the very obvious coverup to the virus origin, and the furin cleavage site...the writing was on the wall
>>16864702"Shizos" didn't conjure it up from nowhere, they read the available data and where skeptical with the lack of other important data.
>>16864702Remember that Clot Adams has at least above average intelligence and cynicism for corporate dictopathy.
>>16865079at least he admitted he was wrong
>>16864702Scientists need funding, schizos can and will use their free time to dig into whatever they can. Researching something you're not supposed to is a good way to get your whole lab's funding cut, but a schizo making Youtube videos as a hobby has nothing to lose.
>>16864096It was worthwhile if even one life was saved
>>16864096The paper says 6%. Not 85%. How do you get to 85%?
>>16867412https://www.uni-koblenz.de/en/mathematics-natural-sciences/math/news/new-study-pcr-tests-significantly-overestimated-actual-infections#:~:text=Co-author%20Robert%20Rockenfeller%20from,academia%20in%20future%20crisis%20management.
