Why do engineers always get butthurt when you call yourself an engineer if you don't have a Bachelors in engineering and always respond with "muh licensure muh PE" even though PhysicistChads can do their job and 100 times better?
>>16865444Oh, you're an engineer? Name all the engines.
>>16865444You need a license to be a real engineer faggot.Just like you need one to be a doctor or lawyer.And the hard prerequisite is a recognized BSc.
>>16865452Only makes sense for critical industries like Civil where integrity matters and regulations are strict. Otherwise for ME and EE it's all just applied science which physicists can do anyways.
>>16865457doesn't matter what you can and cannot doif it's a matter of public safety you need a licenseyes in ME and EE tooyou also can read all the legal books or medicine books and have a doctor's or lawyer's knowledge, but you can't practice itthat's just how it isand why Engineers feel butthurt for "Software Engineers" do, and they are rightthey should have called themselves something else to avoid confusion with the profession that requires licensing>t software "Engineer"
>>16865496So explain physicists who end up working in engineering roles or job postings where companies consider physics graduates for engineering positions.
>>16865444Physicist subhumans are only good when they're in the labs, like the pathetic lab monkeys that they are. When it comes to dealing with customers, defining design specifications and identifying production constraints, it's always Engineers >>> Physics/Math subhumans
>>16865444>Why do engineers alwaysWhy are posts that start this way always low quality and based on a false premise?
>>16865500Anyone can do engineering work, even without a degree or license. A lot of practicing engineers with engineering degrees don't even have a license. But their work all has to be overseen and approved by a licensed engineer, to make sure everything is done safely and in accordance with any applicable codes or standards.
>>16865444>PhysicistChads can do their job and 100 times better?never seen this IRL. engineers get put through the wringer in terms of having to put up with shit in a way that academic programs don't do. I work at a lab where we get all kinds of people (EE&CS institute, robotics lab), the mecanical and electrical engineering grads consistently outperform the others we get (mostly CS, some physicists, a random mix of others)
>>16865500physicists can not make, review or even edit engineering drawings so this is not real work in the sense of engineering, they are likely employed to do material experiments, not to design anything important, engineering is not synonymous with physics, engineers need to care about standards and regulations in their designing, they need to be familiar with cost of materials, etc so many tiny details that would bog down your typical scientist, i don't understand where this entitlement from scientists come from when they can't even look at an one engineering drawing out of hundreds in one design project and tell you what's what
>>16865444
>>16865541>he actually likes being in his little cubicle
>>16865444Fake engineers are caught up in status of degrees. Real engineers build stuff.
>>16865450steam engine
>>16865452licenses aren’t required libtard
